 |
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jaakko
This doesn't look like a ship easily confused with others, especially with those big-ass letters on the bow...
| As Jaakko said how can you miss the big number and letter that are located on the side of every single surface ship in the U S Navy. We do not need a flag. I was US Navy. Your little country did a number on us that day and we let it go.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GP
Siro,
Are you seriously stating that you think the attack was justified? The ship was in international waters, passively collecting ELINT. YOu are not justified in attacking US ships in this situation. (Beleive me...I saw a Russian AGI (Balzac) every time I left San Diego. It sat right at the 12 mile line...)
If you think the attack was justified, surely a cover up wouldn't bother your conscience much... | Hey my last big ops in Feb of 65 off of Silver Strands a Russian AGI came into where we were anchor and took lot of pictures. He pass so close to my Ship we could see their faces.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: Warning: If you go to a warzone, do not ***** and moan when people accidentally shoot you. |
Really? And how did international waters off of Egypt/Israel become a warzone, especially in a war where neither side had a navy worth speaking of?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Coracle
|
|
As an intelligence ship it could pick up Israeli war plans for attacking Syria on the Golan Heights.
The Israelis had already beaten Egypt and Jordan and did NOT want international and U.S. pressure to force them to stop before they grabbed off the Golan.
So, their jets repeatedly attacked a clearly marked U.S. ship, and then Israeli warships attacked it murdering many Americans.
Such is what Zionism represents.
Check out the truth:
http://home.cfl.rr.com/gidusko/liberty/
http://www.ussliberty.org/
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Felch
|
 |
Germantown, Maryland
Sep 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Floyd
Really? And how did international waters off of Egypt/Israel become a warzone, especially in a war where neither side had a navy worth speaking of? |
From Siro's early post:
quote:
On June 8, 1967, the fourth day of the Six-Day War, the Israeli high command received reports that Israeli troops in El Arish were being fired upon from the sea, presumably by an Egyptian vessel, as they had a day before.
|
If Egypt and Israel are at war, then the international waters off of Egypt and Israel becomes a de facto warzone. 
Both nations have ships, maybe not huge nuclear powered carriers, but certainly vessels capable of operating near to their home countries. If Israel thought they were being fired upon, and the Americans denied having any warships there, why not assume that the ships they find belong to the country they're at war with?
Last edited by Felch on 08-05-2002 at 07:23
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Felch
|
 |
Germantown, Maryland
Sep 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
a) IIRC, the US was making noises at that point about not supporting Israel
b) The ship was gathering ELINT data. Somebody in Israel might well have been frightened that the US would (or was) feed(ing) bits of it to the Arabs
|
If the US was going to switch sides anyways, why would we bend over backwards to let the Israelis atack our own ships? Nothing in the scenario fits. America simply would not have tolerated an attack if the relationship was as rocky as you say it was.
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
c) As has already been pointed out, the ship was clearly part of the USN, not the Egyptian fleet. Saying that it must have been an accident because it doesn't make sense for Israel to attack the US is like saying that a murderer whose actions are caught on tape should get the benefit of the doubt because you can't fathom his motives. |
You seem to be right about this. But nations rarely act like random murderers. If they do commit crimes, it's usually because they feel they would stand to benefit. In this situation, nobody has yet demonstrated how Israel would stand to benefit, without stooping to outlandish conspiracy theories.
I don't mean to make that personal, I just find the idea that the US would interfere in a Israeli war to be a remote possibility, and the simple fact that we didn't make much fuss about the USS Liberty attack demonstrates how tightly bound the governments are.
You can't have it both ways people. The idea that the US would be a threat to Israeli ambitions in 1967, but would tolerate a direct attack on its own Navy is ridiculously inconsistent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:19
|
|
Could someone point me to the post in this thread where the reason/motive for the attack, if deliberate, are explained? Thank you.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|