 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:19
|
|
yep, I agree... the kids in Lord of the Flies seemed very ... I don't know a word for it, maybe some of you can help me... all that "being the best" and "being the center of everything" was so apparent, and I've never seen it to such an extent in German kids, though it always appears in American movies... I think it's all the movies themselves, combined with a culture of career and success.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Let's not forget the "Friday the Thirteenth " series. I can't believe they're coming out with another one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Snapcase
Actually, I thought Lord of the Flies was more credible with a bunch of american ****-faced cretins than with real children. See, real children don't actually behave according to the pseudo-christian myths propagated by the book- every time something aikin to the scenario in the book has happened the children managed to coexist peacefully and rationally. Golding, being a christian, has trouble accepting this. |
I didn't see the remake, but there are a couple of things to consider about "The Lord of the Flies":
(1) They're supposed to be British "Upper Class Twits" kids, you wouldn't expect them to behave like normal kids.
(2) It's allegorical.
(3) I can't recall any similar real life incident, a group of 20 to 30 peri-adolescent boys being stranded without adult supervision for an extended period of time, ever happening. Could you provide specifics?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SnowFire
|
 |
New York City, NY
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
Stupid pessimistic self-limiting christians.
Assume for a moment that sin exists (maybe you already do). Do you think it is possible to live an entire life without committing a sin? Bear in mind that according to the Christian view of sin, this includes things like wishing somebody dead or thinking adulterous thoughts, not just actually killing the person or committing the adultery.
I think it's reasonably safe to say that it's pretty much impossible to live without comitting a single sin (never mind any alleged inborn preferences for sin). So, if that's your definition of self-limiting, fine.
However, it is eminently possible- and there are ten zillion examples- that people can live good and moral lives despite the existence of sin. And anybody who uses "original sin" as his excuse to behave like the kids in Lord of the Flies is not going to get very far, at least in my eyes- you're still responsible for yourself, and the limits placed on yourself are your own.
I realize you probably aren't up for a debate on this, but I just wanted to have this out for any onlookers mostly.
Getting back to the topic, in terms of modern movies, Deep Blue Sea is probably the most hillariously bad one I've seen somewhat recently that wasn't an MST3K.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JamesJKirk
|
 |
Dixon, CA USA
Jan 1970 time: 21:19
|
|
I think the people who've criticized Starship Troopers and Tremors missed the point of both of them, as they're both hilarious sci-fi parodies.
The Mummy I & II were great in that it was fun to see what was blatently ripped off from Indiana Jones movies, and what was more subtly stolen. Besides, the little English kid called his mother "Mommy" so as to avoid confusion or something. GREAT! Which reminds me, I saw a horrible similar ripoff a few days ago from the late 80s "Allan Quartermain and the Lost City of Gold" with Richard Chamberlain, Sharon Stone and James Earl Jones. Delightfully Crappy! I love bad movies, but can't stand anything that actually tries to take itself seriously.
What Lies Beneath was there ( I too can't stand the building up music, and then the relief when it's nothing, that gimmick was overdone before it was invented)
Scary Movie (never saw the 2nd one) "Oooh, let's take the same scene but have something stupid happen, and change the characters' names to synonyms! Hilarity!"
I have more, but I'm being merciful now
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CyberGnu
|
 |
of the Virtual Serengeti
Apr 1999 time: 05:19
|
|
well, there is also the 'Dorsai' series, but I can't remember who wrote it. It's pretty good up until the last book (which is thicker than the first six or so books combined...).
If you like more 'naval' military sci-fi (i.e. starships slogging it out instead of groud troops), there is David Weber. He is most known for his 'Honor' series, but I think his short semi-independent serie about an alien invasion is even better.
More light entertainment: the 'Flight Commander' series, by various authors.
Heavy and depressing naval scif-fi (think Hornblower 3000AD), the Hope series by David Feintuch. Stop when the first series does, though, and don't be tempted to keep reading about his sons adventures. Horrible stuff.
But most of all, if you liked Armor and SS, you will most likely love everything Jerry Pournelle has written.
He also has a whole bunch of books with David Niven that aren't military at all (except maybe for Footfall), and they are all ranging from pretty good to amazing (the amazing ones being 'Lucifers Hammer' and 'Legacy of Heorot', IMO).
Have fun!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:19
|
|
Plenty of bad taste to go around at Apolyton. For instance I liked, loved or gladly tolerated the following movies which people mentioned here as their picks for worst movie of all time:
Fight Club
2001
Good Will Hunting
Austin Powers
L.A. Story
Legally Blonde
Gosford Park
Tremors
Something About Mary
Meet the Parents
Popeye
English Patient
What about Bob?
Some of these films I loved, like Fight Club, Austin Powers, There's Something About Mary, Meet the Parents. None of them however deserves a mention on a thread for worst films of all time. As Dr. Strangelove says, there were more horrible "science fiction" (actually grade c monster movies) made in the 1950s that could easily crush any competition that can be mustered today. Believe it or not most of them do not have any camp value unless perhaps you are completely stoned. Another excellent vein to probe for absolute sh!t are movies made in the 1970s which were designed to showcase or explain the new ethics of being a really cool adult circa 1973 or so. I hated this crap when it came out, and it's amazing how poorly it has aged. There are probably a hundred of these films that effortlessly trump anything on the list above.
My best guess as to why the films selected have been so poorly chosen is that most of the people who post here are young. Young people have more time to watch crappy movies, and tend to see them on cable or at the theatre, where your selection is very limited to what's in vogue. Older people do a lot less of that "It's Friday night and I don't have a date (again), what's showing at the Googleplex?" routine. They tend to do a little more research by reading reviews etc. They also tend to watch a lot of crap that their wife / husband wants to see, so it's a two-edged sword. But on the whole I think older people know what's going to suck more than younger people, and don't go see it. It's a function of experience and lack of time to waste.
For instance the vast majority of the films mentioned here were big budget major studio films. I saw the trailers and ads for these films, and perhaps interviews or reviews on TV or the newspapers. I knew those films would suck, so I didn't bother to waste my time with them. I am positive that the vast majority of the time I am right. One film I was sure was going to suck was selected for me by my host one evening. Independence Day was even worse than I thought it would be. I messed me up for a couple of days, until I broke down and rented its parody Mars Attacks. Though that film sucked too, it restored my faith that there are some people in Hollywood who can appreciate exactly how horrific Independence Day was.
I try to see as many independent, foreign and small films as I can. Generally they don't suck as much when they suck, because they have to compete for screen time / video space with thousands of others. There is a lot less competition amongst movies that can lay down 100 million $ for advertising.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|