 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:19
|
|
I'd really love to know where you get your figures, Marcus, because nothing is even close to agreeing with you.
http://specials.ft.com/ft500/may2001/FT31FEOVHMC.html
Top global companies at April 30 2001 in terms of Market Capital:
code: 1 1 General Electric US 482,051.80 240
2 5 Microsoft US 362,980.10 977
3 3 Exxon Mobil US 306,222.80 78
4 4 Pfizer US 273,384.30 480
5 7 Citigroup US 250,730.70 810
6 6 Wal Mart Stores US 231,301.60 524
7 - AOL Time Warner US 214,528.90 535
8 10 Royal Dutch/Shell UK/Neth 210,622.20 78
9 9 Intel US 207,653.20 936
10 16 NTT DoCoMo Japan 206,349.60 678
11 18 Intl Business Machines US 202,738.90 932
12 15 BP UK 201,708.40 78
13 8 Vodafone UK 197,556.10 678
14 11 American Intl Group US 189,412.30 839
15 13 Merck US 174,948.20 480
16 19 GlaxoSmithKline UK 166,265.10 480
17 12 Nokia Finland 155,355.00 938
18 21 Verizon Communications US 148,884.90 673
19 17 SBC Communications US 140,320.80 673
20 24 Johnson & Johnson US 134,883.10 480
21 2 Cisco Systems US 123,553.10 938
22 25 Toyota Motor Japan 122,599.30 311
23 23 HSBC UK 122,141.90 810
24 22 Coca-Cola US 114,876.10 418
25 26 Novartis Switzerland 112,084.90 480
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Saint Marcus
here on the business news we usually get profit, turnover and the increase/decrease in them. Market capital is usually mentioned among other things, but it doesn't has the focus. Also not surprising that Fortune bases it's lists on revenue, and not on market cap, when listing the biggest companies.
and yes I know that says nothing about it's performance, but it is the measure for it's size. |
It's a measure of size of volume of sales, not size of the company or the company's clout in the marketplace.
And what do you mean turnover? Here in North America turnover tends to mean employee turnover, which means higher turnover rates are bad since people are fleeing the company on a regular basis. 
And profits, you say?
Since Sony nearly posted a loss last year, and MS posted record profits....I wonder....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Saint Marcus
posters usually have Sony stuff at home, as well as MS stuff. For some reason, the Sony stuff is usually working rather well, and the MS stuff, well, isn't. Add to that the monopoly MS has, and is abusing, and you got yourself a winner. Sure Sony does some ugly crap too, but the word most closely asociated with "anti-trust" is Microsoft. |
Yeah, and it's a shame since the anti-trust trial in the US has been laughable. It's all based upon hearsay and people whining, and when it came to produce facts and proof to the judge they were all empty handed.
And I quite enjoy the Xbox, Windows XP, and Office XP. No complaints from me.
Although I also quite like my Sony WEGA XBR TV.
But my PS2 pissed me off. They overcharged for it and created artificial supply shortages to increase publicity on launch, and it's got some of the worst design ideas ever conceived. 4MB video RAM?! No easy way to anti-alias?! No easy way to reduce flicker?! Power button on the BACK?! 16 graphics pipes with the memory bandwidth to feed four of them?! No multi-texturing support?!
Not to mention the high CD prices Sony helps maintain, as well as high DVD prices and boxoffice prices.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|