 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:19
|
|
We've had dozens of people saying the same thing hundreds of times and the response is: how would you remove the prejudicial barriers within the workforce.
And no one has been able to provide a decent alternative.
So to paraphrase Churchill, AA has flaws, but it is better than the alternative.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
You just oppose creating equal opportunities. |
I am in favor of giving everyone an equal opportunity to educate themselves. Giving someone a job because of their race is creating an outcome. A new job may be an opportunity, but getting it should be the outcome of education.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:19
|
|
So what Spence and Cali are saying is that them Black folks can't get ahead cause they ain't smart.
**cough** Racists **cough**
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:19
|
|
I have to agree with Garth and David James. Focus on the educational aspects. That is the only way for poor urban minorities to succeed. Their schools, frankly, suck. Tinkai, you are being an idiot, and very PC. Anyone that disagrees with you is a racist. You, sir, are a moron of the highest degree. You fail to read their arguments and simply counter with racist claims. YES, urban blacks (hispanics, asians, whites, etc) don't get the education they need. So, yes, they aren't as educated. Get your head out of your ass, and propose something better than, 'well whites discriminated for years, so now it is their turn to be discriminated for years'.
And no, I'm not white .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Allocate an equal amount of money to every student in every school.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Felch
|
 |
Germantown, Maryland
Sep 2001 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David James
You know, this is silly. The Irish were only "persecuted" (and I use the term with a lot of reservation) after the Reformation when they continued to support Catholic Pretenders to the English (and later British) throne. Had they succeeded, we'd not be sitting here yabbering on about alleged persecution of this, that, and the other thing. We'd still all be under the boot of unaltered of state-supported Roman Catholicism. If anything, the rest of the world owes Protestant Northern Europeans a load of thanks for showing the world that human liberty is possible, for the fight against Catholic persecution later turned into a fight for civil liberties. So there.  |
A multinational Catholic Church diminishes state power more than a state church, such as the Church of England or the Orthodox Churches. When the monarch is both King and in essence, Pope, than they have incredibly more power to diminish civil liberties than if they were only the secular ruler.
The history of the Magna Carta is an example of this. Much of the pressure placed on King John came from the Papacy which I believe imposed an Interdiction on England. Other more recent examples include the creation of the East Timorese state, the overthrow of Ferdinand Marcos, and Liberation Theology in Latin America. In all of these, the power of the Catholic Church was used to diminish the authority of secular rulers.
One other interesting matter to look at in terms of this, is the early history of Protestantism. Martin Luther strongly supported secular authorities, and gave the German princes moral support in their ruthless elimination of a peasant uprising. This led to a Lutheran belief in the primacy of the state, and the rejection of rebellion as a legitimate tool for political change. Centuries later, this played in Adolf Hitler's hands, and Lutherans were some of his most loyal underlings.
The Washington Post had an article yesterday about how the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian government are strongly tied. This sort of thing tends to happen much less in Catholicism also.
Note that I never went over the basic fact that the so-called Pretenders actually had a better claim to the British throne (being Scotish Stuarts) than some Dutch migrant monarchs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
Did you get any free college credits like those under affirmative action? |
Well that's a new one. I've never heard that claim before. I hope you're prepared to back it up.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:19
|
|
Last time I checked this thread, there were only 31, and now it has more than doubled in posts!!
Ok -- trying to find the more significant posts to reply to.
quote: Originally posted by SpencerH
MF
I dont remember if you're a student or not. If you are, or will be again, what will your opinion be if you dont get into the school you want even if you're more qualified because you're white (I assume). Reverse discrimination does exist. |
I am an undergraduate, white college student. One time, one of the black students invited me to join their Black Student League, and I was interested, but I just did not have time.
If I am rejected when I apply to a graduate school because they are seeking EQUALLY QUALIFIED minority students, then I will be upset, but will realize that no system is perfect, and I will have to look elsewhere.
Quote from DAVID FLOYD----
"I would argue that straight white males are persecuted today, through various affirmitive action and "pro-diversity" programs in universities and businesses, and also by the very existence of groups such as the NAACP. Minorities already have equal rights (well, perhaps not homosexuals), now all they want are entitlements at the expense of white males.
Homosexuals are probably a slightly different story - they certainly don't have equal rights in most US states, and as such I can see a function for BENIGN homosexual advocacy groups, so long as said groups do not aggressively cram their beliefs down the throats of others, particularly children in schools.
On the issue of rights to form groups, though, even assuming white advocacy groups are necessarily racist - which isn't true - they have just as much right to organize and promote their views in a benign fashion, just as everyone else does."
END OF QUOTE
So you're saying that heterosexual marriages and relationships are not legitimately recognized in society?
You're saying that people get beat up by hetero phobics because they are viled and hated?
Come on, David -- thought you were better than this.
What you see as cramming ideologies down people's throats, I call legitimate advocacy and protest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|