 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:20
|
|
I'm wondering if we should have local Governors in the Democracy game.
A local governor has the control of a province, i.e 9-10 cities. This control is of course limited, as the ministers have most of the power.
Direct powers of governors :
- they are aware of the exact situation of their cities (either they recieve exact reports, or they access the file)
- they manage happiness in the way they see fit.
- they directly control up to one worker per city, when the minister of workers give them.
- they can make polls within their powers if need arises. They have to follow the vox populi then.
Indirect powers of the governors :
- they lobby the ministers and the prez for the interest of their cities.
- they warn ministers when the city has structural problems (risk of culture flipping, permanent corruption or unhappiness)
- they may give reports to the popualtion on the situation of their cities.
Elections of the governors
Governors are elected the same way as other political personnel. All citizens may elect governors, even if they don't live in their province.
A new governor must be created when a new province is created. The minister for Imperial Expansion decides what the provinces are, and can change this whenever he wants. Each time a new province is created, a governor election must be held immediately, but an interim governor is choosed by the minister of Imperial Expansion in the meantime.
Conclusion : I think governors will make our empire more efficient, as they will micromanage well enough to completely avoid unhappiness, and will explain to ministers what their cities need, in detail. A game with 50-60 cities will demand huge amounts of city micromanagement, that's why the efficiency provided by governors will be yet another step for the greatness of our glorious empire !
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gramphos
|
|
ACS Civ III Files Manager, Prince of Development
|
 |
Chalmers, Sweden
Apr 2001 time: 06:20
|
|
I want to wait until we are at a size where these posts might be useful, and here the cityplanner and imperial expansion minister of that term speak on this.
Also the cityplanner should still have a job, as an instance above any governors. He could be the governor of the main province, but shouldn't have to.
He also should be able to give orders to the governors about how their provinces should be run, but shouldn't do this unless central governing is needed for the empire. Sush situations could be during wars, or preparations for wars, whenthe cityplanner has to work close to the minitarry advisor, and then should ba bale to take control of the priovinces, at least in terms of how many units, and what units, that should be produced in the provinces. Then the Governors should be able to select which cities they put on building units, as long as they fullfill the requirments.
Sorry if you think my brainstorming is bad for your idea, but as I see these as a future occurence I think we might as well discuss what they should be able to do and not to do.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|