Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Europeans Voters Turn Against Left
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (3): [ 1   2   3   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Park Avenue is offline Park Avenue
Emperor
Liberal and defender of freedoms for the people
Oct 1999
time: 05:20
  Old Post 17-06-2002 20:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#61 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

RJ,

The thankful swing to the right in Britain is evidenced by that Labour can now only get to power with a centrist stance, one that some would even describe as centre-right.

red_jon is offline red_jon
King
Uni of Wales Swansea
Oct 2000
time: 05:20
  Old Post 17-06-2002 21:45 Visit red_jon's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#62 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by Zealot
Excuse me but when you say "Well it has to be remembered that the American Democrats would be the equivalent of a right-wing party in Europe.", even if you were being sarcastic, in where would you position the Republicans? Far right?

We can't possibly consider your sentence as logically true!



Republicans? Yes, they would be considered far right (though hardly on the same wavelength as Fascists). The Democrats would be considered moderate right or centre-right.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 17-06-2002 21:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#63 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote:
Plus their checks and balances are so effective that their government has had 226 years of stalemate...


Which has lead to this country becoming a superpower very rapidly . Which also happens to be a good thing. We Americans don't like our government to try to do too much. Stalemate is good, that was the government can't get more things done that make it intrude into our lives.

Lazarus and the Gimp is offline Lazarus and the Gimp
King
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000
time: 05:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 00:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#64 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
Originally posted by Boddington's
RJ,

The thankful swing to the right in Britain is evidenced by that Labour can now only get to power with a centrist stance, one that some would even describe as centre-right.


Look up "Thatcher" then try convincing me that British politics have shifted to the right.

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 01:09 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#65 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

One of the things that you need to remember is that the "Left" has virtually abandoned its base and its politics during this same period, so that when voters voted for a "Left" alternative, they got merely the same right-wing politics the other side had been preaching. When a party abandons its base, its base will abandon it at the polls. Or more simply, you cannot defeat the Republicans by becoming the Republicans.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 02:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#66 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Or more simply, you cannot defeat the Republicans by becoming the Republicans.


Bill Clinton did .

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 02:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#67 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Ron Jeremy
Nice overlooking of the preceding 100 years of social and liberal tradition there, Ned....


Perhaps, Ron, the rise to power of the facists was a reaction to the victory of the left, particularly the communists in Russia.

In other words, the left - right swing of the political pendulum in Europe became extremely dramatic in first half of the twentieth century. That pendulum still swings, but to less extremes than 50 years ago. However the degree of the pendulum's swing was far greater in Europe than in the United States during the same period. I attribute that to the success of the communists and facists in actually gaining power in Europe.

Socialists have had the upper hand in most of Europe since WWII. This seems to be a direct result of discrediting the right as a result of that war. Rightist thinking has been largely "unthinkable" in Europe.

But as time goes on, the right seems to be making a real comeback. The fact that Thatcher actually gained power in the UK has moved the center of UK politics to the right, so that today, the UK, even lead by Labour, is more conservative that the rest of Europe.

Bereta_Eder is offline Bereta_Eder
Prince

Oct 2000
time: 07:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 02:08 Visit Bereta_Eder's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#68 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

hmmm dunno if europe is shuning the left..


actually i find this turn to the rightwing very encouraging.

it will only take 4 years and then...

the left will be better equipped and reformed to take again the reigns for another decade or so
the europeans will have become nausiated by the right and the left wing's victory will be even more easier


one problem though: what's the difference (economically speaking)

Bereta_Eder is offline Bereta_Eder
Prince

Oct 2000
time: 07:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 02:10 Visit Bereta_Eder's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#69 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

besides europe's long social welfare tradition (how ever modest it is it is huge compared to the US) will simply not go away.

nor will the ideology of the left which is again unique compared to the US politics.

Lazarus and the Gimp is offline Lazarus and the Gimp
King
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000
time: 05:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 02:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#70 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by Ned


Socialists have had the upper hand in most of Europe since WWII. This seems to be a direct result of discrediting the right as a result of that war. Rightist thinking has been largely "unthinkable" in Europe.

But as time goes on, the right seems to be making a real comeback. The fact that Thatcher actually gained power in the UK has moved the center of UK politics to the right, so that today, the UK, even lead by Labour, is more conservative that the rest of Europe.


I can't claim to be an expert on cross-European political history, but saying that socialism has had the upper hand in Europe since WW2 isn't true of Britain, and unless my memory deceives me it isn't true of France either.

And- as my earlier post pointed out, Thatcherism did not shift the British political spectrum to the right. It was rejected in favour of politics remarkably similar the the pre-Thatcher era. Labour has headed right, but the two other major political parties (the Liberals and Tories) have both headed left.

Bereta_Eder is offline Bereta_Eder
Prince

Oct 2000
time: 07:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 02:56 Visit Bereta_Eder's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#71 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

for many many years after WW2 in most european countries the right wing was in power constantly, heavily sponsored by the US by both legal and illegal means.

Greece's first left wing government was in the '80s for example (and has been in power ever since with a small exception of 3 years)

DaShi is offline DaShi
Prince
The Taste of Japan
Sep 2000
time: 05:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 04:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#72 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

No one answered my corntree question.

Roland is offline Roland
Emperor
Auf'm Jahrmarkt :(
May 1999
time: 06:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 12:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#73 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

Imran:

"We Americans don't like our government to try to do too much. Stalemate is good, that was the government can't get more things done that make it intrude into our lives."

Only that it doesn't work that way any longer. Instead of proposal X simply going to the dustbin, you get half of proposal X plus a load of pork. And the vast majority of dems and reps have yet to find a police state measure they didn't like.

Ned:

"Socialists have had the upper hand in most of Europe since WWII."

Please, before you try ro make some conclusions, get some reasing on the facts. Apart from distinctions between socialists and social democrats, the facts don't support this "upper hand" theory - let's just look at the 5 biggest countries:

Britain had permamnent changes (dont know the years by heart), but the longest party rule was conservative: 1979-1997.

Germany:
Cons 1949-1966
Cons/Soc 1966-1969
Soc/Lib 1969-1982
Cons/Lib 1982-1998
Soc/Green 1998-

France had some murky coalitions in the IVth republic; then from 1958-1981 they had a cons president, 1981-1995 a socialist, and 1995-2007 at least a cons again.

In Italy, the communists were in opposition until the early 90s, and the "socialists" especially under Craxi were a junior partner in the various DC governments.

Spain was Franco's fascist toyland into the 1970s. Then you had a cons governemnt, and the soc from 1982-1997 IIRC, now cons again.

Tolls is offline Tolls
King
Hereford, UK
Jan 1970
time: 05:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 13:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#74 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

Roland:
For the UK since '45 -

45 - 51 : Labour
51 - 64 : Conservative
64 - 70 : Labour
70 - 74 : Conservative
74 - 79 : Labour
79 - 97 : Conservative
97 - ?? : Labour

All Conservative governments had a reasonable majority in this period...8 of Labour's years had either a small majority (5 or so) or a minority government.

So we have ~22 years for Labour and ~35 years for the Tories.

Park Avenue is offline Park Avenue
Emperor
Liberal and defender of freedoms for the people
Oct 1999
time: 05:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 14:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#75 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:
Look up "Thatcher" then try convincing me that British politics have shifted to the right.


If British politics have shifted to the left or not at all, why did Labour need to move right in order to be elected, even despite several years of inept Tory rule?

Lazarus and the Gimp is offline Lazarus and the Gimp
King
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000
time: 05:20
  Old Post 18-06-2002 21:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#76 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Try reading subsequent posts before making them yourself. Would you like me to post my last response to Ned again in the hope that you might read it this time?

Over the last 10 years, the Liberals have headed slightly left. Over the same period the Tories have made a more substantial move in a rejection of Thatcherism. In other words, the parties that over 60% of the electorate voted for are moving left.

Labour have moved right, but that was a reaction against the polarisation of the early 80's where they held their most extreme left-wing stance. They rejected this and made for the middle ground of the existing spectrum- in other words (for the 3rd time of explanation) it's a return to post-war consensus politics.

Now try explaining how you think the political spectrum is shifting to the right.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 02:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#77 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Ron, It seems to me that the US and GB are virtually on the same page politically. I assume this is becuase both Blair and Bush have moved to the center of their respective nations politics.

But, Ron, my thesis was that the European center since WWII has generally been to the left of the US center. The reason for this, I believe, is that the extreme right was all but eliminated from European politics, while the extreme left was not.

I also beleive that the election of Thatcher and Reagan moved the centers of UK and US politics to the right.

Again, showing that there were both conservative and liberal governments in Europe does not mean that what I am saying here is incorrect. There are oscillations in politics, but the oscillation is about a center. It is my perception that the center of European politics has largely been to the left of the US center since WWII.

Also, you might want to comment on my point about the extreme politics of Europe in the first half of the last century. Nothing like that has every occured in the US.

red_jon is offline red_jon
King
Uni of Wales Swansea
Oct 2000
time: 05:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 02:42 Visit red_jon's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#78 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Ned
Ron, It seems to me that the US and GB are virtually on the same page politically. I assume this is becuase both Blair and Bush have moved to the center of their respective nations politics.


Actually Blair seems more like Clinton, who's reforming of the Democrat party in order to win the '92 election was later adopted by Blair and New Labour to win '97.

I would hardly say Bush is centrist.

Vlad Antlerkov is offline Vlad Antlerkov
King
Do you have Matt Stairs in your house?
Mar 1999
time: 23:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 02:47 Visit Vlad Antlerkov's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#79 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
That's explained by the fundamental voter apathy in the US. Even with two choices it's hard enough for them to make up their minds...


I know. Maybe we can't choose between two candidates because we don't have two brain cells to rub together. Most of us are lucky if we get one. (Pretty much everyone down in the US Capitol and the statehouses seems to be lacking in any brain cells.)

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 02:48 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#80 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Don't be too hard on yourselves. I know you mean well...

Roland is offline Roland
Emperor
Auf'm Jahrmarkt :(
May 1999
time: 06:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 11:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#81 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Oh holy quadrupility, Ned.

"It seems to me that the US and GB are virtually on the same page politically."

Where do you get this bizarre idea ?

"I assume this is becuase both Blair and Bush have moved to the center of their respective nations politics."

Bush would be a member of the BNP or the Monster raving loony party in Britain. I'm not sure he's centrist enough for the nutty right wing fringe of the tories. Especially the religious crap would make him an outsider.

"But, Ron, my thesis was that the European center since WWII has generally been to the left of the US center."

No, your center is to the right of ours.

Sikander is offline Sikander
King
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000
time: 22:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 17:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#82 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Originally posted by Roland
Apart from the different political spectrums, there's another difference between US and euro politics.

Every ten years or so, we kick out the ruling party as a matter of political hygiene. If both big parties try to glue themselves to power, we punish both of them until they quit (Austria's big coalition, France's cohabitation). While the US is permanently living in a big coalition ripe with corruption - it is absolutely puzzling that no opposition arises. The only recent exception was Perot, and he used shitloads of money....


You are making an error if you think the "divided government" that has been predominant in the U.S. for the past several decades is anything like a coalition in a parliementary style government. The largest immediate difference is that there is absolutely no need to agree on anything in order for the government to function, much less to agree to share power in a cooperative fashion. It also makes corruption a strange proposition. Only political elements with enough money / power to bribe both of the main parties with large sums of money have a hope of getting away with something. Everyone else is picked on by the party that is not receiving it's "share" of the juice. This system of government reduces the power of the legislative branch in favor of the executive, as the executive gets to do what it wants regardless, while the legislative branch is unable to do much of anything unless it is wildly popular, or there is a mother of a backroom deal made.

Roland is offline Roland
Emperor
Auf'm Jahrmarkt :(
May 1999
time: 06:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 17:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#83 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

"The largest immediate difference is that there is absolutely no need to agree on anything in order for the government to function"

How is this different from a big coalition government ?

"Everyone else is picked on by the party that is not receiving it's "share" of the juice."

Accordingly both parties are being bribed with minor differences. And both recieve their share of the overall pie. One crow, and another crow....

"This system of government reduces the power of the legislative branch in favor of the executive"

Compared to a parliamentary system, it increases the power of the legislature.

Sikander is offline Sikander
King
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000
time: 22:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 17:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#84 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Roland
"The largest immediate difference is that there is absolutely no need to agree on anything in order for the government to function"

How is this different from a big coalition government ?


They have to agree to a lot, starting with forming the coalition and running right on down the line on ministries and issues.

quote:
Originally posted by Roland
"Everyone else is picked on by the party that is not receiving it's "share" of the juice."

Accordingly both parties are being bribed with minor differences. And both recieve their share of the overall pie. One crow, and another crow....


True enough. The amazing thing to me is that the amount of money being used is nothing in comparison to the amount of money that can be made through bribery / campaign contributions. For many businesses there is no better investment than buying a congressman for $10,000.

quote:
Originally posted by Roland
"This system of government reduces the power of the legislative branch in favor of the executive"

Compared to a parliamentary system, it increases the power of the legislature.


I'm not sure I follow you here.

Roland is offline Roland
Emperor
Auf'm Jahrmarkt :(
May 1999
time: 06:20
  Old Post 19-06-2002 17:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#85 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

"They have to agree to a lot, starting with forming the coalition and running right on down the line on ministries and issues."

And that's it. I wouldn't say that's a lot. Our last big coalition managed to get virtually nothing useful done, which was why it got trashed in every election.

"The amazing thing to me is that the amount of money being used is nothing in comparison to the amount of money that can be made through bribery / campaign contributions."

Yes, the multiplier is enormous.... It's a quite expensive way to run a political system.

"I'm not sure I follow you here."

Polotically, the parliamentary majority is tied into the government - they're one block, effectively.

 
Pages (3): [ 1   2   3   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20.
Apolyton Time is 00:20.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0573 seconds (90.64% PHP - 9.36% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net