 |
| |
|
|
Lincoln
|
|
L O N D O N, June 16 — Left-leaning governments across Europe are being kicked out by voters worried about ailing economies, crime, illegal migrants and a fear that traditional policies of state control don't work.
Europeans are turning to conservative, and even far-right parties, for tough economic reforms and law-and-order policies. Many see the left as out of step with ordinary people.
Left-of-center governments have fallen in Italy, Norway, Denmark and the Netherlands. France's Socialists lost power in Sunday's parliamentary elections, according to exit polls, while Germany's once popular Social Democratic government is the underdog in September's elections.
In the greatest shock, Prime Minister Lionel Jospin of the Socialist Party was knocked out of France's presidential elections this spring and resigned. Left-wing voters found themselves having to vote for conservative incumbent Jacques Chirac to ensure the defeat of far-right candidate Jean Marie Le Pen in the second round.
It is a far cry from the 1990s, when the left swept to office across Europe and ecstatic supporters talked of decades in power. The left believed it had the answers for post-Cold War Europe in a globalized economy - a blend of capitalism and traditional left-wing social policies to protect workers and fund generous welfare programs.
There was also a strong belief that the left would speed up integration of the European Union, turning it into a 15-nation power to rival, even eclipse, the United States.
Reality proved to be very different.
Most of the governments were coalitions of left and centrist parties, constantly weakened by internal disagreements that often hampered efforts to cut chronic unemployment and make their economies more competitive in the global market. Some governments had to curb welfare programs or, when faced with powerful lobbies such as trade unions, to drop needed reforms to fix ailing economies.
"Today, the main issue in Europe is implementing reforms. Center-left leaders know, but sometimes they have a coalition behind them that doesn't leave them room to do it," said Sergio Romano, an Italian analyst.
The left has been hit by a pervasive sense among voters that governments are more a problem than a solution. Some politicians say voters blame whatever government is in power and that whoever replaces the left will be booted out after a term or two in what is a revolving-door system.
But perhaps more than any other factor, the left has failed to tackle key law-and-order issues worrying many voters, especially illegal immigration and crime. Rightly or wrong, many voters link the two and feel threatened in their own homes.
A growing number of Europeans are worried or feel threatened by the influx of hundreds of thousands of newcomers, legal and illegal, from the Middle East, Asia and Africa. Even in traditionally tolerant nations like the Netherlands and Denmark, populist outsider parties have made strong gains by capitalizing on fear of large ethnic minorities that show little sign of integrating.
Peter Mandelson, a former British minister, said the left lost touch with middle-of-the-road voters that having long preached racial tolerance and welcomed immigrants, it has trouble even discussing such issues meaningfully, let alone coming up with policies.
"What recent electoral experiences show is that center-left parties lose where they are out of touch and refuse to face up to tough issues that are 'cultural' rather than ideological," he wrote in The Times newspaper.
Voters think right-wing parties are better at coming up with tough policies to tackle illegal immigration and other problems, said Romano. "The right does a better job at giving public opinion the feeling that the problem is under control," he said.
Some analysts say conservative parties also don't have solutions and that is why more and more voters are turning to anti-immigrant firebrands such as Le Pen in France, Joerg Haider in Austria, and Pym Fortuyn in Holland, whose party did well in parliamentary elections a month ago even though he was assassinated days earlier.
The far right will grow stronger if voters continue to believe the mainstream parties don't care about them, analysts say.
"Parties arise that can't be ideologically pinned down," said Dietmar Herz, an analyst at Erfurt University in Germany.
"They take up issues loaded with resentment - immigration, asylum seekers, integration of foreigners and disgust with politics."
------------------------------------
Well this might be something to argue about...
Last edited by Lincoln on 17-06-2002 at 00:58
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lincoln
|
|
I edited it out now so I wouldn't be put in a concentration camp.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Monk
|
|
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970
time: 06:20
|
|
Even in traditionally tolerant nations like the Netherlands and Denmark, populist outsider parties have made strong gains by capitalizing on fear of large ethnic minorities that show little sign of integrating.
I wrote a school project on the reasons for the Danish shift to the right at the parlamentary elections last November. The article made points on the populist scoring points on the issues of crime and immigration, but there are other noteworthy factors at play here. Of course, my focus was on Denmark but I'd think the same would apply for other countries. To summarize:
1) Voters don't vote according to class or ideological/economical beliefs, but care more for human issues, so to speak - what happens to people and their behaviour towards each other. Obviously, this greatly increases focus on crime and immigration, and then, the failure of the social democrats to demonstrate the personal values behind governmental decisions eventually becomes obvious and fatal. For this reason, although Danish social democrats reaped many compliments for their handling of our country's economy, they couldn't use it for much on election day.
2) The lack of a big, serious EU-sceptical center party. And in addition to that, a social democratic party cut in half where the leaders are strongly in favour, but the voters are much more sceptical, leading to a situation where they lose faith in their political elite, which are said to be out of touch with the people they represent. The right-wing leaders don't have this problem because they're not in the government, meaning that all of the focus is usually on one person, the leader, whose position in a more centralised party is virtually unthreatened due to the achieved results and because there hasn't been any other leaders.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lazarus and the Gimp
|
 |
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000
time: 05:20
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Lincoln
But perhaps more than any other factor, the left has failed to tackle key law-and-order issues worrying many voters, especially illegal immigration and crime. Rightly or wrong, many voters link the two and feel threatened in their own homes.
A growing number of Europeans are worried or feel threatened by the influx of hundreds of thousands of newcomers, legal and illegal, from the Middle East, Asia and Africa. Even in traditionally tolerant nations like the Netherlands and Denmark, populist outsider parties have made strong gains by capitalizing on fear of large ethnic minorities that show little sign of integrating.
Peter Mandelson, a former British minister, said the left lost touch with middle-of-the-road voters that having long preached racial tolerance and welcomed immigrants, it has trouble even discussing such issues meaningfully, let alone coming up with policies.
|
Riiiiight. So is preaching racial tolerance and welcoming immigration good or bad?
Moral of the story? We too have witless buffoons, and allow them to vote and have opinions. That's democracy.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Stefu
|
 |
CLOWNS WIT DA DOWNS 4 LIFE YO!
Jan 1970
time: 07:20
|
|
There is a righty sweep going on, indeed. Ever since Dubya, really. Putin in Russia, Fox in Mexico, Sharon in Israel, Rasmussen (not Rasmussen!) in Denmark, whoever (I'm pretty sure it isn't Varg Vikernes!) in Norway, Berlusconi in Italy, Balkenende in Netherlands, now Gaullists in France... and we can't forget Blair in Britain. 
It's partly good and partly bad. I wouldn't vote for Berlusconi or British Conservatives, and definitely not for Dubya or Sharon, but having some change in power to less social-democratic in Scandinavia and other European countries isn't that bad.
As long as the change doesn't include Centre Party getting to government in Finland. Then again, they aren't righty party or anything. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Monk
|
|
I don't think we're in Brønshøj anymore
Jan 1970
time: 06:20
|
|
What made Fortyun famous even before his death was his liberal approach on various social issues. This serves as an indication of the crucial difference between the Republican Party and at least some of the European populists - the moral, restrictive part isn't present, or at least severely toned-down, making them easier to swallow. I've yet to see a Danish People's Party frontperson speak out against abortions or condemning homosexuality. And they're the only Danish party in favour of lifting the ban on selling alcohol to people younger than 15.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20.
Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-06-2002 00:48
|