 |
|
markusf
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by GP
54-40 or fight!! |
There is no one in alaska.
The one problem i could see is boarder checks etc. You can make it impossible to move goods from one enclave to another, or at least very expensive and time consuming.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000
time: 07:20
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ned
It is really obvious that the West Bank has to be reunited with the East Bank. They are one people on both sides of the Jordan. The only reason there is a line between the two is Britain, who, after WWI, wanted to give their ally Hussein "something" in exchange for his support in the war and in fulfillment of their agreement with Hussein. So they carved off half of Palestine and made Hussein's son king. |
hi ,
hey ,  , the allready have special roads , that connects them , what else they want a, more land on the side of that road , .... NO , ...NEVER
as for the role of the brits , grrrrrrrrr , what is jordan today is what the pals where going to get , ...
and they wanted more , so they should fight it out with the jordan's , ....
also , lets not forget that the jordans showed yasser the door , .... with good reason , ...
have a nice day
|
|
| |
|
|
|
panag
|
|
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000
time: 07:20
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dalgetti
Ned is generally correct, except the fact that it wasn't Hussein ,it was his grandfather , Abdullah. |
hi ,
next you are going to agree with a 5 mile wide road , ....
, nope that goes to far , and its a step in the direction of more "pigua" , ....NO - thank you , they have a nice status as it is to travel between the both pieces , ....
have a nice day
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:20
|
|
What Arafat agrees to or not is useless at this point. While I can see peace going forward more if arafat stays as opposed to Sharon staying, Arafat's days are numbered, if simply because of internal Palestinian stuggles. But whomever rules either side, this area is moving towards an inevitable point:
The Palestinians will get a state,borders generally around the Green Line and some sort of resolution, thought not right of return, will be worked out for the refugees. This will still take many years and I expect to see a continuation of Israeli-Palestinian violence, as well as serious bouts of internal violence for both sides, with more than a few politicians of boths sides getting killed by their own side for "treason". The world, whether conservatives want it or not, is moving ever towards a greater emphasis on individual rights over states rights, even with the current 9/11 paranoid phobia in the west. Over the next 50 years it can't be helped but that immigration laws will have to be made to allow more poor to move to rich areas(if these areas xpect both economic growth in poor regions and to maitain internal leves due to deline in available workers) and international human righs regiments will gain force. 9/11 is proof that tech is making the diffusion of power into the hands of NGO's an actual threat to states powers and this is a trend that states can't stop, so either they coopt the system or will be swept away with it. Israel can't afford to keep the occupied territories, just look at the current budget mess the cuts and the high taxes. That if anything will bring Sharon down, and the only way future PM's will be able to solve this econmic morass is by getting out of the territories. Continual occupation is too expensive, it may stop the suicide bombers but not the violence and that will continue to isolate israel and scare off investors. If israelis wish to return to the growth of the 90"s, they must leave the territories. Otherwise the current economic situation may become the norm.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000
time: 07:20
|
|
quote:
that it gives no time table for the withdrawl of Israel from a good chunk of Palestine. On top of that, it leaves most of the settlements intact. Basically, this is like Versailles. |
1) The time table for the Israeli withdrawal was 2 years.
2) The bit about the settlements is pure word play. The real matter is that large settlements are absorbed into Israel, and the rest are either disbanded or absorbed into Palestine. As of that phase, they will no longer be settlements.
quote:
It's more that Palestine will be broken up into many cantons |
And where is the evidence for that? The Israeli roads? What's the problem with those? If there won't be any security incidents they would have been incorporated in Palestine.
quote:
that the water will still be under Israel's control, that all Jerusalem will still be part of Isreal (even with Palestinian authority over the holy places and the Arab quarter), that it ignores the status of the refugees, |
1) The water is now still under Israel's control, and Israel does suply Palestine with water and even supplies water to South Lebanon, absolutely for free.
2) Jerusalem could have been split. The Palestinians would have had authority over the Arab and Armenian quarters and religious authority over the holy sites.
I remind you again, Israel allows anyone to pray at the holy sites. When it was under Arab rule, no such thing occured and Jews were barred from visiting the holy sites.
3) The refugee status isn't at all ignored. An international fund is set up to take care of them and their relocation to other countries. Several tens of thousands will be brought to Israel, in a family unification program.
Your whole claims are nothing but mindless propoganda.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20.
Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
22-06-2002 22:30
Apparently they dissapeared after Sept. 11.
|