 |
|
CygnusZ
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Cloud9
How can you say that? I changed my mind about things many times in this thread. Just look for yourself. |
I was referring to your entire belief system. After all, there are certain things you do believe without any proof or good reason.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CygnusZ
|
|
How can you claim to hold things to a high standard of investigation on one hand, and on the other hand just dismiss me by saying "I have faith"? Sounds like a double-standard to me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lung
|
 |
of my princess Anastasia!
Mar 1999 time: 15:20
|
|
*Lung jumps on the bandwagon*
Another delusional religious nut, i see
What is it with these guys? Because the answer must be strictly in accordance with the bible, then all "research" must result in a particular answer, irrespective of how much it defies all logic and known fact! It is the most absurdly illogical endeavour ever undertaken by mankind. Scarily, it is also the most common
What gets me is that the people who insist on others "opening their eyes" invariably are the ones who are the most closed-minded Seriously, if everything in the universe must fit inside a strict dogma, can one possibly be any more closed-minded?
Face facts, Cloud9, you were indoctrinated into your faith, and brainwashed in the extreme. Scientists are open-minded by virtue of the fact that they will believe to be true whatever proves to be true. You believe in the bible alone, irrespective of truth. That makes YOU the closed-minded one. And a delusional one at that 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CygnusZ
I was referring to your entire belief system. After all, there are certain things you do believe without any proof or good reason. |
as somes everyone
some assumptions must be made for reality to make sense
some peoples inital assumptions include the existence of a God, as such it is not a ludicrous action to have as an inital set of assumptions a set of beleifs which are internally consistent
now those beliefs which are derived (in this case Cloud9's belief that this is Noah's Ark) can be investigated and even changed without bringing into question the core beliefs
you do this also, you just do not realise it
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CygnusZ
|
|
No, I pretty much agree that things are fundamentally based on faith. Aren't you assuming that what you see is true? Isn't it possible that you're dreaming or that an evil demon is controlling you? Isn't science based upon the assumption our senses are true, even though they may well be not? So yes, I do believe there is much faith in this world.
I can live with the possibility that nothing I know is true. Surely it isn't asking very much that Cloud9 not abandon his faith, but examine the exact composition of it.
edit: Just for the record, I do not confirm or deny the existance of a God.
Last edited by CygnusZ on 03-07-2002 at 08:49
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mr. Nice Guy
|
 |
"I'm gonna speak softly, but carry a BIG STICK!!!"
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lung
Face facts, Cloud9, you were indoctrinated into your faith, and brainwashed in the extreme. Scientists are open-minded by virtue of the fact that they will believe to be true whatever proves to be true. You believe in the bible alone, irrespective of truth. That makes YOU the closed-minded one. And a delusional one at that |
Not so. I have now come up with a new theory, since all others have led to dead ends, that the boat like shape discovered upon the mountains of Ararat is not the Ark itself, but a fossilized imprint of the Ark. I am still doing my research, though, and will have more information on this later.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:20
|
|
I have now come up with a new theory, since all others have led to dead ends, that the boat like shape discovered upon the mountains of Ararat is not the Ark itself, but the imprint left by a spaceship crewed by little green men from Mars. I am still doing my research, though, and will have more information on this later.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
I have this theory about coffee. Every job I have ever had, they have a coffee machine and almost everyone drinks it in the morning and throughout the day. When you show up for work on your first day, they offer you a cup of coffee. So you drink it. The next day you have another. This goes on for awhile, and before you know it, you are only going to work for the coffee. You are now addicted and you can't quit your job even if you want to and ten years of your life have slipped by. Can someone investigate this for me?
Am I in the wrong thread?
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame63.html
Last edited by MosesPresley on 03-07-2002 at 11:06
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack the Bodiless
|
 |
Converted underground reservoir tank.
Jan 1970 time: 05:20
|
|
Ah, yes, Ron Wyatt.
I've seen his site before. I remember being amused by the lab results which "proved" that there were "metal oxides" in the rock. Wyatt even posted pictures of the assay slips, revealing large concentrations of silicon and aluminum oxides: apparently unaware that this is what rocks are normally made of!
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
As we mentioned earlier, Ron is a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist, one of 23,000 in the U.S. Since 1984, however, he has had little time to practice his profession. |
I suspect he tests his anaesthetics on himself. That could explain a lot.
The "second site" claim is a standard creationist ploy to attempt to hang on to another exploded claim. The same thing happened with "Moab Man". Creationists claimed that human bones had been found in an impossibly advanced stage of fossilization, completely transformed into green malachite and buried fifty feet down in solid sandstone. They were actually normal bones (carbon-dated to a few centuries old) stained green by copper salts and buried fifteen feet deep in sand. After these facts became common knowledge, creationists started talking about a second find nearby. These bones allegedly ARE composed of solid malachite, but were recovered and stored by faithful creationists who won't let those nasty heathen scientists examine the holy relics this time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mr. Nice Guy
|
 |
"I'm gonna speak softly, but carry a BIG STICK!!!"
Mar 2002 time: 23:20
|
|
Well, as far as I'm concerned about the discovery of Noah's Ark found by Ron Wyatt is that it probably is Noah's Ark. I take back when I said that it might be an imprint of Noah's Ark, though this is still a possibility. Here is why:
Like I've heard you all say before, and I feel it is true, anyone can put whatever the heck they want on their website, as well as in a book, magazine, video, etc.
Between the opinions of people that say Ron Wyatt's discovery is Noah's Ark and those that deny it contradict each other. The information that I found in both opinions doesn't add up; in that it is entirely different and unique from each other. Therefore, this would come to an inconclusive result. I have found evidence of opinions concerning the other discoveries of Ron Wyatt that also contradict each other.
Now the Bible does say that most people will be decieved by Satan and refuse to acknowledge the truth in the Bible. So in effect most will refuse to acknowledge the discovery of Biblical artifacts or evidence of truth in the Bible. Even those who are Christian may refuse to acknowledge such discoveries so as to protect the element of faith in religion, which is so important.
So my final judgement is that it is inconclusive wether or not Ron Wyatt has discovered Noah's Ark. Only someone who goes to the Noah's Ark site themselves to see what is there and is honest about it can really know the truth about it. But I strongly lean toward the belief that it is Noah's Ark because most people seem to say that it isn't and Satan will decieve most people.
Case closed. 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|