Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > An Unborn Child is in Fact, Human
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (17): [ <<   13   14   15   16   17   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 09:35 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#451 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I seem to recall that the Old Testament includes passages which allude to the termination of pregnancy as if it was normal and no big moral issue - but I can't remember the passages.

Certainly most societies have practiced some form of birth control including abortion - usually through the use of purgative herbs in pre modern times.

CyberGnu is offline CyberGnu
King
of the Virtual Serengeti
Apr 1999
time: 05:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 09:35 Visit CyberGnu's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#452 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:
Well, you're the one that asked, so, you get what you ask for. A wishful interpretation? I think I've made my point very clear.


Umm, what the hell are you talking about?

quote:
How much dumber can you get?


Well, I got my Chemistry PhD recently, so I guess I have quite a fall ahead of me...

quote:
Or are you still just trying to give me a hard time?


In a previous post you claimed that the bible said that a zygote is a human being.

I've now shown you repeatedly that your interpretation of the quoted passages is erronous, and the bible does not take a stance on the issue. If you consider that a waste of time, it could only be because you are not prepared to keep an open mind...

CyberGnu is offline CyberGnu
King
of the Virtual Serengeti
Apr 1999
time: 05:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 09:37 Visit CyberGnu's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#453 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

BTW, a d/l is a 'double login'. He is impying that you are in reailyt another poster who has created a new persona with some kind of extreme view, just for amusement purposes. It is not a compliment...

Mr. Nice Guy is offline Mr. Nice Guy
Warlord
"I'm gonna speak softly, but carry a BIG STICK!!!"
Mar 2002
time: 23:20
Question  Old Post 08-07-2002 09:41
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#454 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:
Originally posted by CyberGnu
BTW, a d/l is a 'double login'. He is impying that you are in reailyt another poster who has created a new persona with some kind of extreme view, just for amusement purposes. It is not a compliment...


Where does he get that from?

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:20
Exclamation  Old Post 08-07-2002 09:50 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#455 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Has anyone suggested that every sperm is sacred yet?

I believe the ancient Israelites believed this

Mr. Nice Guy is offline Mr. Nice Guy
Warlord
"I'm gonna speak softly, but carry a BIG STICK!!!"
Mar 2002
time: 23:20
Wink  Old Post 08-07-2002 10:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#456 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

quote:
Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Has anyone suggested that every sperm is sacred yet?

I believe the ancient Israelites believed this


quote:
Originally posted by Cloud9
And about the "killing" of sperm cells, when you gotta go, you gotta go (to the bathroom, that is). You just can't keep all those wastes in your body; it would kill you if you did. Another suicide mission I say.


Mr. Nice Guy is offline Mr. Nice Guy
Warlord
"I'm gonna speak softly, but carry a BIG STICK!!!"
Mar 2002
time: 23:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 10:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#457 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:
Originally posted by CyberGnu
In a previous post you claimed that the bible said that a zygote is a human being.


Did I say that? Excuse me. My mistake. What I meant to say was that the unborn are human beings; this is not to say that unborn animals are human beings.

Mr. Nice Guy is offline Mr. Nice Guy
Warlord
"I'm gonna speak softly, but carry a BIG STICK!!!"
Mar 2002
time: 23:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 10:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#458 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by CyberGnu
Umm, what the hell are you talking about?


Sorry, I got you mixed up with Jaakko.

CyberGnu is offline CyberGnu
King
of the Virtual Serengeti
Apr 1999
time: 05:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 10:42 Visit CyberGnu's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#459 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

Ahh, Jaako is finnish, I'm a swede. I drink less vodka and I don't stab people in the sauna.

quote:
Did I say that? Excuse me. My mistake. What I meant to say was that the unborn are human beings; this is not to say that unborn animals are human beings.


Actually, I was summarizing. You did say unborn. But since the argument here is whether a zygote is a human or not, and you answered that the bible says that the unborn is a human being, that must be taken as you saying that the zygote is human being, right?

The problem is that no where in the bible does it say that the unborn = a zygote. It might very well only mean a sentient fetus. We don't know, since it doesn't elaborate on the subject.

So the Bible doesn't support either pro-life or pro-choice.

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 10:47 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#460 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

I'm sure there's passages in the bible which show a relaxed attitude to birth control including terminations.

Urban Ranger is offline Urban Ranger
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic

Donate to the Red Cross
The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
May 1999
time: 13:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 10:51
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#461 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Cloud9
You do need someone to explain things to you in dummy language, don't you?


It's not me who is not comprehending.

quote:
Originally posted by Cloud9
Irresponsible sex is defined as the failure to use contraceptives and to have your partner tested for STD's before having sex.


Proof by definition. Another fallacy.

quote:
Originally posted by Cloud9
I don't see where you're coming from on the other "holes."


You still have yet to substantiate any one of your assertions.

quote:
Originally posted by Cloud9
Perhaps you should speak to me in dummy language.


Maybe you'll understand it better that way?

Urban Ranger is offline Urban Ranger
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic

Donate to the Red Cross
The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
May 1999
time: 13:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 10:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#462 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by Cloud9
Did I say that? Excuse me. My mistake. What I meant to say was that the unborn are human beings; this is not to say that unborn animals are human beings.


Same thing. Unborn animals are a subset of "the unborn."

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 10:58 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#463 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:


What Does The Bible Say
About Abortion?

Absolutely nothing! The word "abortion" does not appear in any translation of the bible!

Out of more than 600 laws of Moses, none comments on abortion. One Mosaic law about miscarriage specifically contradicts the claim that the bible is antiabortion, clearly stating that miscarriage does not involve the death of a human being. If a woman has a miscarriage as the result of a fight, the man who caused it should be fined. If the woman dies, however, the culprit must be killed:

"If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.

"And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth . . ."--Ex. 21:22-25

The bible orders the death penalty for murder of a human being, but not for the expulsion of a fetus.

When Does Life Begin?
According to the bible, life begins at birth--when a baby draws its first breath. The bible defines life as "breath" in several significant passages, including the story of Adam's creation in Genesis 2:7, when God "breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." Jewish law traditionally considers that personhood begins at birth.

Desperate for a biblical basis for their beliefs, some antiabortionists cite obscure passages, usually metaphors or poetic phrasing, such as: "Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me." Psalm 51:5 This is sexist, but does nothing other than to invoke original sin. It says nothing about abortion.

The Commandments, Moses, Jesus and Paul ignored every chance to condemn abortion. If abortion was an important concern, why didn't the bible say so?

Thou Shalt Not Kill?
Many antiabortionists quote the sixth commandment, "Thou shalt not kill" (Ex. 20:13) as evidence that the bible is antiabortion. They fail to investigate the bible's definition of life (breath) or its deafening silence on abortion. Moreover, the Mosaic law in Exodus 21:22-25, directly following the Ten Commandments, makes it clear that an embryo or fetus is not a human being.

An honest reader must admit that the bible contradicts itself. "Thou shalt not kill" did not apply to many living, breathing human beings, including children, who are routinely massacred in the bible. The Mosaic law orders "Thou shalt kill" people for committing such "crimes" as cursing one's father or mother (Ex. 21:17), for being a "stubborn son" (Deut. 21:18-21), for being a homosexual (Lev. 20:13), or even for picking up sticks on the Sabbath (Numbers 15:32-35)! Far from protecting the sanctity of life, the bible promotes capital punishment for conduct which no civilized person or nation would regard as criminal.

Mass killings were routinely ordered, committed or approved by the God of the bible. One typical example is Numbers 25:4-9, when the Lord casually orders Moses to massacre 24,000 Israelites: "Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before the Lord against the sun." Clearly, the bible is not pro-life!

Most scholars and translators agree that the injunction against killing forbade only the murder of (already born) Hebrews. It was open season on everyone else, including children, pregnant women and newborn babies.

Does God Kill Babies?
"Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones."--Psalm 137:9
The bible is not pro-child. Why did God set a bear upon 42 children just for teasing a prophet (2 Kings 2:23-24)? Far from demonstrating a "pro-life" attitude, the bible decimates innocent babies and pregnant women in passage after gory passage, starting with the flood and the wanton destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, progressing to the murder of the firstborn child of every household in Egypt (Ex. 12:29), and the New Testament threats of annihilation.

Space permits only a small sampling of biblical commandments or threats to kill children:

Numbers 31:17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones.
Deuteronomy 2:34 utterly destroyed the men and the women and the little ones.
Deuteronomy 28:53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters.
I Samuel 15:3 slay both man and woman, infant and suckling.
2 Kings 8:12 dash their children, and rip up their women with child.
2 Kings 15:16 all the women therein that were with child he ripped up.
Isaiah 13:16 Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled and their wives ravished.
Isaiah 13:18 They shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eyes shall not spare children.
Lamentations 2:20 Shall the women eat their fruit, and children.
Ezekiel 9:6 Slay utterly old and young, both maids and little children.
Hosea 9:14 give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts.
Hosea 13:16 their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.
Then there are the dire warnings of Jesus in the New Testament:

"For, behold, the days are coming, in which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the womb that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck."--Luke 23:29
The teachings and contradictions of the bible show that antiabortionists do not have a "scriptural base" for their claim that their deity is "pro-life." Spontaneous abortions occur far more often than medical abortions. Gynecology textbooks conservatively cite a 15% miscarriage rate, with one medical study finding a spontaneous abortion rate of almost 90% in very early pregnancy. That would make a deity in charge of nature the greatest abortionist in history!

Are Bible Teachings Kind to Women?
The bible is neither antiabortion nor pro-life, but does provide a biblical basis for the real motivation behind the antiabortion religious crusade: hatred of women. The bible is anti-woman, blaming women for sin, demanding subservience, mandating a slave/master relationship to men, and demonstrating contempt and lack of compassion:

"I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."--Genesis 3:16
What self-respecting woman today would submit willingly to such tyranny?

The antiabortion position does not demonstrate love for humanity, or compassion for real human beings. Worldwatch Institute statistics show that 50% of abortions worldwide are illegal, and that at least 200,000 women die every year--and thousands more are hurt and maimed--from illegal or self-induced abortions. Unwanted pregnancies and complications from multiple pregnancies are a leading killer of women. Why do antiabortionists want North American women to join these ghastly mortality statistics? Every day around the world more than 40,000 people, mostly children, die from starvation or malnutrition. We must protect and cherish the right to life of the already-born.

Do Churches Support Abortion Rights?
Numerous Christian denominations and religious groups agree that the bible does not condemn abortion and that abortion should continue to be legal. These include:

American Baptist Churches-USA
American Ethical Union
American Friends (Quaker) Service Committee
American Jewish Congress
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
Episcopal Church
Lutheran Women's Caucus
Moravian Church in America-Northern Province
Presbyterian Church (USA)
Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Union of American Hebrew Congregations
Unitarian Universalist Association
United Church of Christ
United Methodist Church
United Synagogue of America
Women's Caucus Church of the Brethren
YWCA
Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice
Catholics for Free Choice
Evangelicals for Choice

Belief that "a human being exists at conception" is a matter of faith, not fact. Legislating antiabortion faith would be as immoral and unAmerican as passing a law that all citizens must attend Catholic mass!

The bible does not condemn abortion; but even if it did, we live under a secular constitution, not in a theocracy. The separation of church and state, the right to privacy, and women's rights all demand freedom of choice.



My bad - I must have been thinking of the Old Testament's general condoning of the mass killing of children

I found the above here:

http://www.ffrf.org/nontracts/abortion.html

Urban Ranger is offline Urban Ranger
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic

Donate to the Red Cross
The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
May 1999
time: 13:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 11:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#464 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Not the Freedom from Religion Foundation, Horse

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 11:16 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#465 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Here is an even better article - well worth a read. I'll post just an extract.

quote:


Myth: The Bible forbids abortion.

Fact: All Biblical arguments on abortion are indirect and open to debate.

Summary

The Bible does not comment directly on abortion, even though abortion was practiced even then. All Biblical arguments on abortion are indirect and open to interpretation, and debate continues even among the world's most respected theologians. Even so, the Bible seems to suggest in several places that the unborn are not endowed with the qualities or rights of personhood. In fact, the Jews, who are famous for their preservation of tradition, have never considered abortion to be a sin.



Argument

Many Christians believe that their opposition to abortion is firmly supported by the Bible. This is untrue. The Bible is remarkably silent about abortion, and all arguments about the subject are indirect and highly questionable. Not even the world's most respected theologians have been able to draw a firm conclusion one way or the other, despite continuing debate.

Most Christians know only one Biblical reason to oppose abortion, and that is the obvious one, "Thou shalt not kill." This is one of the most critical laws a society can obey, and every pro-choice advocate agrees with it. However, it is impossible to break this commandment if there is no person on the receiving end of this action. The challenge to Christians is to find a text that declares at what point a fetus becomes ensouled, and hence a person.

Before we look at these texts, we should consider a quick attempt by Christians to sidestep this entire question. Personhood is irrelevant, they argue; even if the zygote were not yet a person, it is nonetheless human life, and killing it is wrong. But this argument falls easily. The Hebrew word for "kill" in the 6th Commandment is rasach, which more accurately means "murder," or illegal killing judged harmful by the community. It is itself a relative term! Many forms of killing were considered legal; indeed, God often gave Israel permission to kill. (In I Samuel 15:3, God ordered Saul to massacre the Amalekites: "Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants…") Generally, levitical law permits killing in times of war, the commission of justice and in self-defense. But recall that the levitical law we have in the Bible is incomplete, and comes to us in large gaps. If a law did exist on abortion, then we simply do not know what it was. Fortunately, we have an excellent idea on what the law on abortion might have been. As Rabbi Balfour Brickner, National Director of the Commission on Interfaith Activities, says:
"Jewish law is quite clear in its statement that an embryo is not reckoned a viable living thing (in Hebrew, bar kayama) until thirty days after its birth. One is not allowed to observe the Laws of Mourning for an expelled fetus. As a matter of fact, these Laws are not applicable for a child who does not survive until his thirtieth day."
Since the fetus is not considered a person under Jewish law, it would be impossible to consider its abortion a murder. Indeed, most Jewish scholars have agreed that abortion was legal under Jewish law. This fact alone should give serious pause to the pro-life movement.

The legality of abortion in Jewish law fits into a larger and perfectly coherent philosophy on personhood according to the Bible. The philosophy I am about to demonstrate is this: that physical creation of the body comes first, and ensoulment only comes much later.

Pro-choice Christians note that the creation of Adam was a two-step process: God first formed Adam from the dust of the ground, and only then did he give him the breath of life, turning man into a living soul. This closely resembles the scientific description of pregnancy, which notes that the first seven months are devoted to constructing the organs and body, and only by the 8th month does the fetus display a waking consciousness.

There is also a long Christian tradition of the body/soul dichotomy. The flesh has long been condemned as temporary, imperfect, sinful and weak, whereas the soul has long been revered as eternal, pure, holy and God-like. It would be perfectly consistent for Christians to believe that personhood resides in the soul, and that there is no sin in disposing of a physical entity before it is given the soul of a new person.

From here we turn to specific Biblical evidence for ensoulment and personhood. Pro-choice activists have a near-argument stopper in Exodus 21:22-23:
"If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury [i.e., to the mother], the offender must be fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. But if there is serious injury [i.e., to the mother], you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot…"
The traditional interpretation of this text, which even rabbinical scholars accepted for thousands of years, is this: if a man hurts a woman enough to cause a miscarriage, he reciprocates according to how much injury he caused her, i.e., an eye for an eye, etc. However, if the miscarriage resulted in no injury to the woman, then all the assailant had to pay was a monetary fine. The fact that the Bible does not equate the assailant's life with the stillborn's life is proof that the Bible does not count the fetus as a person.



I found this here:

http://www.korpios.org/resurgent/L-bibleforbids.htm

CyberGnu is offline CyberGnu
King
of the Virtual Serengeti
Apr 1999
time: 05:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 12:40 Visit CyberGnu's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#466 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Excellent research, Horsie!

One question though: In the last two paragraphs, I don't understand why we can be so sure the interpretation of injury only pertains to the woman. Couldn't it be read as 'if she gives birth prematurely, but the child survives, the assailant pays a fine. If she gives birth prematurely and the child dies, the assailant dies'?

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 17:01 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#467 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
Originally posted by CyberGnu
Excellent research, Horsie!



Thanks but sadly I find a 30 second search on Google puts paid to most fanatics. This never ceases to amaze me. In this case I got a lot of food for thought from it too.

quote:


One question though: In the last two paragraphs, I don't understand why we can be so sure the interpretation of injury only pertains to the woman. Couldn't it be read as 'if she gives birth prematurely, but the child survives, the assailant pays a fine. If she gives birth prematurely and the child dies, the assailant dies'?


Follow the second link and read the next part of the article. It goes into that in some detail. It also shows how fundies have tried to get around that text and rebutts their interpretation quite effectively.

Mr. Nice Guy is offline Mr. Nice Guy
Warlord
"I'm gonna speak softly, but carry a BIG STICK!!!"
Mar 2002
time: 23:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 17:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#468 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Proof by definition. Another fallacy.


Pervert.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 19:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#469 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

The Hippocratic Oath explicitly forbids abortion. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 20:08
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#470 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
An unborn child is in fact an unborn child. It has the potential to become human but until there is a live birth this is nothing more than a potential.

I used to buy all this hardline anti-abortion crap until I had children of my own and went though the whole process. Now I don't know - so many pregnancies never make it to term - its a very iffy process. In my opinion, the welfare of the mother is much more important than the welfare of the unborn child.

I'm pro-choice as a result and I don't think a bunch of celibate priests and Christian fundamentalists know the first thing about it. Having said that I think abortion is a poor choice in most cases but I respect people's right to choose.

I've been in the delivery ward when a dead baby was born. The nurses were doing the birth cerificate for my son whilst they were doing the death certificate for the other child. It could very easily have been the other way round. That's life.

We've had 4 live births and lost one, our first, so don't tell me what to think about it until you've been there yourself.

Both my sisters have had miscarriages, one of them multiple miscarriages - but she's currently pregnant again - we're not going to send any congrats till she gets to 6 months with it. My sister in law had a couple of miscarriages. Friends of ours had a downes syndrome child, which they love dearly - they also had the courage to try again and had a child with no disability against all the odds.

I'm afraid this is an area where noone has the answers.


Well Horsey, I've been in practice for nearly twenty years now, and I've encountered these situations among my patients, far more often than you can comprehend, so i will speak my mind if it so pleases you! In the US it's standard practice for a woman's physician to try to help her through the grieving process when she looses a pregnancy. We generally encourage the parents to deal with the child's death in the same manner that we would had the child survived birth. This procedure has in fact ben proven to improve the parents' mental health. It's the compassionate thing to do. If it's not standard practice in Australia then that's yet another good argument against socialized medicine.

You don't seem to be saying: "abortion? Big deal! Babies die in utero everyday!" It would appear that you're not making a distinction between abortion and natural death. Even you should be able to understand the fallacy in your reasoning.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 20:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#471 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Here is an even better article - well worth a read. I'll post just an extract.



I found this here:

http://www.korpios.org/resurgent/L-bibleforbids.htm


I saw little proof of his thesis within the article. One would have to accept his word that the bible says what he says it says. Why couldn't he supply actual quotes form the bible? The testimony from the rabbi is also worhtless. One would only have to tune in to "Dr. Laura" for a few minutes to realize that not all jews accept his interpretation of jewish law. I wonder what the law is in Israel?

The article you used above this is even worse. You took phrases ripped from the bible out of context to constuct a phony thesis. That's pretty disgusting. Is this the best you have?

DanS is offline DanS
Emperor
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 20:37 Visit DanS's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#472 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

"I WILL FOLLOW that method of treatment which according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patient and abstain from whatever is harmful or mischievous. I will neither prescribe nor administer a lethal dose of medicine to any patient even if asked nor counsel any such thing nor perform the utmost respect for every human life from fertilization to natural death and reject abortion that deliberately takes a unique human life."

It appears that from the perspective of the oath, whether or not the embryo is a human being is secondary. Rather, a plain reading suggests that it hinges on the fact that the life is both unique and human.

It is very interesting that similar language is in the original version...

"I WILL FOLLOW that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give a woman a pessary to produce abortion. "

And amazingly, he was swearing by Apollo the physician.

Last edited by DanS on 08-07-2002 at 20:46

November Adam is offline November Adam
Prince
Calgary, AB, Canada
Jul 2001
time: 22:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 21:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#473 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

yet doctors still perform abortions.

do doctors have to swear by the hypocratic oath when they get there degrees?

November Adam is offline November Adam
Prince
Calgary, AB, Canada
Jul 2001
time: 22:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 22:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#474 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

AH, with all due respect I am going to have a little baby born within days, and it is a real person now, even though it isn't born. I say "it" cause I don't know the gender, otherwise it would be little Matthew, or little Sarah.

From a purely emotional stand point the little zygote became a person once I found out my wife was pregers. Because for a non-person it sure had an impact on our lives. Sure you could argue that finding out you have cancer would have an impact, but it would definetly be a different impact, as you don't buy a crib, or clothes for cancer!

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 22:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#475 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by DanS
"I WILL FOLLOW that method of treatment which according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patient and abstain from whatever is harmful or mischievous. I will neither prescribe nor administer a lethal dose of medicine to any patient even if asked nor counsel any such thing nor perform the utmost respect for every human life from fertilization to natural death and reject abortion that deliberately takes a unique human life."

It appears that from the perspective of the oath, whether or not the embryo is a human being is secondary. Rather, a plain reading suggests that it hinges on the fact that the life is both unique and human.

It is very interesting that similar language is in the original version...

"I WILL FOLLOW that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel; and in like manner I will not give a woman a pessary to produce abortion. "

And amazingly, he was swearing by Apollo the physician.


Was there a point to this post? It is generally understood that the subject of the practice of medicine are humans. I suppose in ages past some physicians also substituted for veternarians at times, but I don't think that is an issue with regard's to Hippocrates' oath.
The concept of uniqueness is also moot since every life is genetically unique from the moment that the sperm's genome merges with that of the ovum's. It is obvious that the inclusion of the word "unique" in the oath at this point is an affirmation of the reason compelling Hippocrates to write his oath rather than a condition for its application.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 23:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#476 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by Alexander's Horse


My bad - I must have been thinking of the Old Testament's general condoning of the mass killing of children

I found the above here:

http://www.ffrf.org/nontracts/abortion.html


I'm an Episcopal. The Protestant Episcopal Church has assiduously avoided publishing an official position on abortion. You may find statements from individual clergy or bishops somewhere. You might even find some mention of a propsed statement somewhere, but you won't find a statement of position fully ratified by the clergy and layity and approved by the Presiding Bishop. I'd deeply appreciate it if you would restrain yourself from posting out right lies about other people's religions.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:20
  Old Post 08-07-2002 23:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#477 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by November Adam
yet doctors still perform abortions.

do doctors have to swear by the hypocratic oath when they get there degrees?


The oath administered has been changed to exclude mentioning abortion at many American medical schools.

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:20
  Old Post 09-07-2002 04:13 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#478 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove


Well Horsey, I've been in practice for nearly twenty years now, and I've encountered these situations among my patients, far more often than you can comprehend, so i will speak my mind if it so pleases you! In the US it's standard practice for a woman's physician to try to help her through the grieving process when she looses a pregnancy. We generally encourage the parents to deal with the child's death in the same manner that we would had the child survived birth. This procedure has in fact ben proven to improve the parents' mental health. It's the compassionate thing to do.



Of course we are talking here about people who wanted the child.

quote:


If it's not standard practice in Australia then that's yet another good argument against socialized medicine.



It is practiced here. Free health care is great!

quote:


You don't seem to be saying: "abortion? Big deal! Babies die in utero everyday!" It would appear that you're not making a distinction between abortion and natural death. Even you should be able to understand the fallacy in your reasoning.


I'm merely pointing out that both abortion and natural death have been a normal part of pregnancy, or pregnancy management for want of a better term, for millenia. In fact you could argue there wasn't much distinction. When infant mortality was higher people had a much different attitude - and we haven't even talked about infanticide, which was not unusual for sickly babies in Western societies right up to the 20th century.

CyberGnu is offline CyberGnu
King
of the Virtual Serengeti
Apr 1999
time: 05:20
  Old Post 09-07-2002 04:59 Visit CyberGnu's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#479 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:

quote:
Proof by definition. Another fallacy.



Pervert.



Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe

An endless source of amusement!

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:20
  Old Post 09-07-2002 06:03 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#480 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
The Hippocratic Oath explicitly forbids abortion. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!


Sorry Doc, no cigar.

All Hippocrates said was physicians should not perform abortions. He did not say it was wrong.

This is not meant to talk down to you but as you probably know in the ancient world the demarkation lines between priest, apothecary, midwife and physician were not clear. What Hippocrates tried to do was define the role of physician's in that division of labour i.e as one of exclusively saving life.

Hippocrates did not see terminating pregnancies as a role for physicians - its that simple. That role, in fact the whole pregnancy area, was probably seen as women's business and left to midwifes.

I would go so far as to say that that all this trouble about abortion probably started when pregnancy and birth got medicalised and male doctors moved onto the midwife's turf.

Women are so much wiser about these things

Last edited by Alexander's Horse on 09-07-2002 at 06:12

 
Pages (17): [ <<   13   14   15   16   17   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20.
Apolyton Time is 00:20.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0671 seconds (90.80% PHP - 9.20% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net