 |
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
I'm not against the Viking/naval idea per se, but it has something similar has already been done in one of the earliest AUs. Plus, designing a map to make good use of the Vikings is a little contrived for my taste (maybe that's just me being a spoilsport).
I would really like the AU students (all of us) to try something completely different. OCC. That's right, OCC. All AU students will have to put their biases and reservations aside and learn all about the wonders of OCC. As a learning experience that we have not done yet, I do not think we'll find a better scenario idea. For those who have never tried it, I guarantee it will increase your play skill.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
I think revisiting the "island-hopping" scenario is a fine idea, and the Vikings are definitely the civ of choice. I may not be big on playing the game myself, but that's no reason not to go through with the scenario.
Nathan, I understand your point of view, but do not see why we have to create a whole dedicated section for "elective" courses. I see all the courses as elective. Those who want to sit this one out will not be waiting for too long, because OCC games are much shorter than standard ones.
You're one of the best city managers I know of, so I can see why OCC is not very appealing to you. But I think a scenario dedicated to the management of one city could definitely be of benefit to many players here. OCC also teaches the player about how to trade smartly with the AI, since if you neglect this you'll probably lose. This skill, effective trading (including learning AI priorities and such), I consider extremely important, one that deserves to be learned here at AU.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
quote: Originally posted by BigDork
OCC??? Is that one city challenge?
|
Yes. It's very doable and fun.
quote:
Perhaps using some of the old and spicing it put a little? Just a thought.
|
That's what I'm thinking: we could re-do "island hopping" (which I also missed), but with the Vikings which were not available the first time around.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Hm, but why would it need to be an ongoing thing? I would think that if it is onging people would likely participate less. If it's made "official" for one of the next scenarios, people will be more inclined to "check it out", and then read the spoilers (which would contain more than a fair amount of strategy, since there's not much "storytelling" in OCC...).
The reason why I'm pushing this so is that I remember learning loads about Civ3 when I played my first few OCC games. It's not my favorite way to play Civ3, but's I think its definitely something everyone in AU should at least try out.
(I'll stop repeating myself now...)
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nbarclay
I wouldn't be against opening the AU 211 thread-set with a standard AU game, but AU 211 would also provide a place for people to show later games, either to ask for ideas for improvement or to suggest ideas that others might want to try. |
Fabulous idea. Of course, we should get a feel for what the other players want before we set up the game (and we should leave some time to finish AU206...).
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
If you're inclined to try OCC, you should have no qualms about doing the same for 5CC. The two types of game play out very differently, but the general theme is the same. I think we should try out OCC first, since it involves some real lateral thinking. Then, after some "normal" games, we can go for 5CC (which I have yet to do myself).
Dominae
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|