 |
|
|
I'm inclined to agree with some of the naysayers on this one. Turnthreads are fine for those of us who live in varied parts of the world (and can't make the regular chats), and it wouldn't hurt to have them replace intermediary chats, but I think that the full turnchats should remain. Even if less people are there, they can be a lot more involved.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kloreep

|
 |
of the pillow
Jun 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sn00py
This could scare people away, the whole idea of this democracy game is for fun and if you remove that factor, then what is the point?
If it's not happening in real time (chat) then I find it difficult to understand what's going on, I am practically playing blind.
I don't support this idea, sorry.
But I do understand that our turns are taking far too long just to do simple things and I think we need to sort out some rules during chat, because otherwise it is just going to get worse and worse. |
As Trip (and now you) pointed out, it's going to get worse as we get more cities and units. And, as Trip has pointed out, it may get to the point where we have to cancel turnchats - or, at the very least, cancel playing along, which is half the point and most of the fun of turnchats anyway.
If the demogame can't be fun without turnchats (I personally have a lot of fun just on the forum, but that's maybe that's just me) I think we should start reworking the rules now so that it stays fun till our victory (or, dare I say it... defeat).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|