 |
|
reds4ever
|
 |
of the Spion Kop
Mar 2001 time: 05:20
|
|
all i was say was that the USA has fundamentally changed as a result of 9/11, you denied it had. I think the fact that laws are being passed that affect it citizens that would have got passed previously is a good indication of that change.
BTW that percentage of the American population is 000000028 of a person, edit some noughts out;O)
Last edited by reds4ever on 18-07-2002 at 19:16
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:20
|
|
see, i think this is all very funny. we have people on one side who are terrified that america's time as the greatest country in the world will end because of this (wrong-- it'll end for some other stupid/silly reason in the future), and those who seem to have no problem with this, because they have faith that such things won't be abused, and that security is important (too much faith in their fellow man, if you ask me).
let's step back from this now, just for a moment. i want to know some things about this TIPS program; and i want us to lay out a groundwork for debate.
1. what will we define as "suspcious behaviour"? some of us are arguing that this isn't an infringement on rights because all the program is planning to do is have people keep their eyes and ears open for "suspicious behaviour".
what qualifies as suspicious behavior? is it being a bad american and having a japanese car in your garage? is it a letter from your father who lives and works in saudi arabia? maybe receiving a package/mail-order bride from russia? or, loading up a lot of boxes into your truck that at a university lab? or maybe just not flying the flag on four july?
what's "suspicious behaviour"? if we know what exactly it is that's suspcious, and what the government is sees as "suspicious", we'd be more able form a debate around that, and decide whether or not the government is as evil as it might seem.
2. what manner will this TIPS system be implemented? according to ashcroft (pity he went to uchicago... give all the rest of us good uchicago grads a bad name~), TIPS will not grant its informants access to private homes and what not. but if citizens are to be involved in scoping out "suspicious behaviour", how will they go about doing so? without entering homes, it'd probably be rather difficult to know what the private individual is doing-- no terrorist, no matter how brazen his plan, is going to make his preparations on his front lawn. is it going to involve phone taps? video surveillance? mail filtering? how is TIPS planning on circumventing court decisions on such matters? and how are they going to find trustworthy people to actually put this stuff into this vast database they want to set up? there are already problems with things like "married credit reports", in which two people with similar names/social security numbers have their credit ruined because the two different people have the same credit file-- would this be a potential issue in this new electronic database (is there any other kind these days?)?
see, honestly, this debate right now sounds like two different groups of people arguing over something they both don't know much about...
let's try to hammer out those things before we go onto whether TIPS is evil or not.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|