 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberGnu
We didn't join the nazis. If we would have, we would have sent troops to fight with the nazis like the hungarians and italians did.
To avoid being invaded we sold steel instead. Do you really think greece would have done anything else? |
It did.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I dont agree with Dr. Strangelove.
I dont think the Swedes of today have any guilt.
acually this whole allegded guilt trip of europe towards jews is a hoax in order to justify to the "world" why europe will not tolerate acts of terrorism from either side.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
After refusing to join the Axis.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
We had the choice to say "Yes" instead of "No" and let the italians and the germans use greek soil for their operations as was the demand of the italians.
About not being able to win anyway, Greece was thought by all that it would certaintly fall under a 6 times larger Italy.
It did not. and yes Italians are said to suck at war but they were still 6 times larger.
So sometimes things that are hopeless are not always so.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CyberGnu
Well, the problem here Strangelove is that Sweden didn't do ANYTHING to the jews, so we don't have any guilt.
We elected not to have our own citizens killed in a war we couldn't have won in the best of cases, and would have been catastropic in the worst of cases.
And I still don't know what this argument does in this thread. Open a new thread for it if you think it is worth the effort. |
(1) You stood by and let it happen, even though you were in a unique position to have knowledge about the holocaust.
(2) You supplied the Nazis with the means to make weapons to oppose the would be rescuers of Hitler's victims. In fact, without you Germany would have been unable to make the high grade weapons that enabled them to hold off superior forces for so long.
If you're in downtown Washington and you give a gun to a known gangsta who goes out and shoots a kid you share the guilt in my eyes.
(3) My message is relevant to this thread in so far as you have blamed the Jews for the conflict in Israel because they are occupying land that once belonged to the Palestinians. I'm pointing out that you Europeans actually bear the blame because you drove them out of their European homes. Making guns for the anti-semites gives you a share of the blame.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
blackice
|
 |
Canada where else...
Sep 2000 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: No, because only Tweedledum can understand Tweedledee. |
Hummmm
The Bible is far more complicated than we remember. We know that Cain murdered his brother Abel. It’s simple, right? Cain is bad; Abel is good. And yet, when we examine the Book of Genesis, we may lose our confidence in Cain’s utter wickedness. The brothers’ story begins when God accepts Abel’s sacrifice but rejects Cain’s offering. Interpreting the story in later generations, some of our ancient rabbis attempt to brand Cain as malevolent from the get-go; they charge that he presents God with inferior produce, keeping the best for himself. And yet, the Bible itself levels no such indictment. Cain does not seem to be wicked until he murders Abel, an act that is certainly evil. God punishes Cain severely. Later, though, Cain appears to live his life appropriately, in keeping with God’s expectations. The evidence is that this biblical figure, guilty of the most heinous of all crimes, is not without merit. God appears to give him another chance, and not to treat him as thoroughly evil. If God can see Cain as something other than completely wicked, are we to judge him more harshly? We begin to realize that what seemed black and white may be better characterized as charcoal gray.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|