 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
We sure as hell didn't lose the war of 1812. Didn't capture canada (sorry, frogger, you have to be a canuck.) but we beat the hell out of the Brittish forces which attacked us. Old Hickory wouldn't have said we lost that one.
Wars we've won decisively:
American Revolutionary
Texas Rev
Mexican War
WWI
WWII
Wars we'd have won decisively if not for pusywimp politicians:
Korea
Gulf War
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
in WWI and WWII I think your contibution was only a fraction of the total contribution of Europe and the Allies in general.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
in WWI and WWII I think your contibution was only a fraction of the total contribution of Europe and the Allies in general. |
Now, I mean no disrespect whatsoever to the hundreds of thousands of Britons, Poles, canadians, australians, or other nationalities who sacrificed their lives for freedom in the second world war, but if it weren't for US intervention, the war would have been lost.
That's it. Period. The Brittish put up a fierce defense, and should be applauded for their victory in the battle of britain, but they could not hold out alone. The russians put up a poor showing at first, but, thanks in large part to US training and technology (Such as their high-quality steel) they slowly turned the tide and stopped the german onslaught at the eleventh hour.
Wihout the US strategic bombers, supplies, men, and munitions, the war would have been lost. Also, don't forget, we more or less had to fight the japanese by ourselves after 1941.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:21
|
|
Great post, Che; a neighbor leant me that issue when it first appeared in print. My favorite passage is from Ramachandra Guha's essay on questioning his own anti-American feelings:
quote: I became a member of the local British Council, but would not enter the library of the United States Information Service. Then my wife got a scholarship to Yale, and I reluctantly followed. I reached New Haven on a Friday, and was introduced to the Dean of the School where I was to teach. On Sunday I was taking a walk through the campus when I saw the Dean park his car, take a large carton out of the boot, and carry it across the road to the School and up three flights to his office.
That sight of the boss as his own coolie was a body blow to my anti-Americanism. My father and grandfather had both been heads of Indian research laboratories; any material they took to work or back—even a slim file with a single piece of paper in it—would be placed in the car by one flunkey and carried inside by another. (Doubtless the Warden of an Oxford College can likewise call upon a willing porter.) Over the years, I have often been struck by the dignity of labour in America, by the ease with which high-ranking Americans carry their own loads, fix their own fences, and mow their own lawns. This, it seems to me, is part of a wider absence of caste or class distinctions. Indian intellectuals have tended to downplay these American achievements: the respect for the individual, the remarkable social mobility, the searching scrutiny to which public officials and state agencies are subjected. |
Every time I deal with my students, who have never done a day's work in their lives, I think about Turkey's minimum wage (approx. $100/month), then think about that passage and smile wryly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dan Severn
Now, I mean no disrespect whatsoever to the hundreds of thousands of Britons, Poles, canadians, australians, or other nationalities who sacrificed their lives for freedom in the second world war, but if it weren't for US intervention, the war would have been lost.
That's it. Period. The Brittish put up a fierce defense, and should be applauded for their victory in the battle of britain, but they could not hold out alone. The russians put up a poor showing at first, but, thanks in large part to US training and technology (Such as their high-quality steel) they slowly turned the tide and stopped the german onslaught at the eleventh hour.
Wihout the US strategic bombers, supplies, men, and munitions, the war would have been lost. Also, don't forget, we more or less had to fight the japanese by ourselves after 1941. |
I think that Stalin and Churchill could have taken Hitler
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
The whole point of my post was that they could not have.
The Russians were on their last legs when we entered they war fully, and the Brits certainly weren't going to invade Hitler's europe. And if one cannot take the offense, the war is lost. The Russians were helped quite a bit by the fact that the german regenerative capabilities were so hampered by Strategic bombing, which was effective due to the thousands of American bombers- the Britons simply did not have the resources to cause major damage to the German Empire.
Also, remember that hitler and stalin had signed a non-aggression pact. The Russians were in no way friends of the Brittish, they simply had a common enemy. Even the US entrance did not ensure victory. Had the Normandy landings failed, had we lost at midway, we could very well have lost the big one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dan Severn
Now, I mean no disrespect whatsoever to the hundreds of thousands of Britons, Poles, canadians, australians, or other nationalities who sacrificed their lives for freedom in the second world war, but if it weren't for US intervention, the war would have been lost. |
quote: That's it. Period. The Brittish put up a fierce defense, and should be applauded for their victory in the battle of britain, but they could not hold out alone. The russians put up a poor showing at first, but, thanks in large part to US training and technology (Such as their high-quality steel) they slowly turned the tide and stopped the german onslaught at the eleventh hour. |
quote: Wihout the US strategic bombers, supplies, men, and munitions, the war would have been lost. |
You are quite a dreamer. It was very funy, thank you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
Yes, serbia made such a difference in the war.
Ignorance of history does not become you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dan Severn
The whole point of my post was that they could not have.
The Russians were on their last legs when we entered they war fully, and the Brits certainly weren't going to invade Hitler's europe. And if one cannot take the offense, the war is lost. The Russians were helped quite a bit by the fact that the german regenerative capabilities were so hampered by Strategic bombing, which was effective due to the thousands of American bombers- the Britons simply did not have the resources to cause major damage to the German Empire. |
When you entered the war Germans were on their legs, not Russians. Germany was already doomed. The end of nazism was just a question of time, several months actully. The biggest and most imortant battles of WW2 was already over.
quote: Also, remember that hitler and stalin had signed a non-aggression pact. The Russians were in no way friends of the Brittish, they simply had a common enemy. Even the US entrance did not ensure victory. Had the Normandy landings failed, had we lost at midway, we could very well have lost the big one. |
If Normandy landings failed it changes nothing. Actully Germans made a successfull counter attack once and your president asked Stalin to begin Russian major offence operation a weak earlier to help your forces. Stalin gave that order and it cost additional lives of Russian soldiers.
Germany was doomed after 1943, so Normandy didn't changed much. It's just bring an end of nazism a bit sooner.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dan Severn
Yes, serbia made such a difference in the war.
Ignorance of history does not become you. |
Yes, Serbia made a contribution in the war. And very important. They hold several German divisions which should be used in Barborossa operation. If those devisions were used in Russia in 1941... No one could tell now what could happen then.
But I'm not from Serbia. I'm from Siberia. Do you know the difference?
Last edited by Serb on 24-07-2002 at 10:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
Notyoueither, I was not tryiong to claim "a piece of the pie." I was merely saying that the United states was hardly of Minor importance to the war, as paiktis had implied. The war could not have been won without the USSR or the Brittish, either. But it was too important to be dismissed.
Last edited by Dan Severn on 24-07-2002 at 10:57
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|