 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:21
|
|
--"I take it you've had a lot of problems with some of the other types then?"
Not personally, but I do know some people who have had a fair bit. I've never had any problems with the Fuji ones. The only time I've ever coastered a disc was trying to overburn.
Besides, they look nice
--"If there are cheaper brands than Crucial... any special reason why you like them better?"
Quality, reputation, and warranty. Same reason I tend to buy Asus boards even though there are cheaper. When you build the computer out of quality components you'll have a lot less issues with them.
--"Have you heard any new info on the G5, Asher?"
I'm not Asher, but don't hold your breath. The G5s are going to be primarily designed and used in the embedded market. This is particularly new or anything, but it's more extreme this time than before. I don't think Apple is going to be getting a decent supply of these for some time, and I do have to wonder what the performance will be like.
Wraith
"Change is the essential process of all existence."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
FlameFlash
|
 |
Minnesota, USA
Dec 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
Fez, once you actually offer some counter-points to my posts I'll actually dignify some kind of command like that with a response. I've asked you questions, you ignore them, I explain definitions, you ignore them, I respond to your questions and posts, you ignore them and say I'm suffering from idiocy.
You are simply a little anti-Mac troll if you continue to refuse to offer counter-points to my points and counter-points. This argument is over as far as I'm concerned, I'm tired of you wasting my time with your "demands" while not respecting my own questions and posts.
And BTW... just read that Motorola and Apple are working on a motherboard that will support an affordable (okay, so it'll be just as expensive as current upper Mac models) quad processor motherboard and a 1.6GHz chip.
And Fez... rather than just assuming that the $6B is running out fast, why don't you give us some numbers that actually prove that they are.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
http://news.com.com/2100-1001-948239.html?tag=fd_top
quote: Analyst: Apple to lie down with Intel
By Michael Kanellos
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
August 2, 2002, 2:34 PM PT
Apple Computer will likely shift to using Intel chips, while circumstances exist that could well push Dell Computer and Sun Microsystems into a friendly embrace, predicted Bear Stearns analyst Andrew Neff.
Intense competition, softening demand, excess capacity and the fact that virtually every technology company shows some sort of exposed vulnerability will likely prompt a rash of changes in the market, according to Neff in the latest version of his "PC manifesto," a detailed report on the state of the market.
"The key for investors to is to realize that this isn't a game where companies die and simply go away," Neff wrote. "In reality, this is a rare occurrence. We believe it is a time for company managements to take steps toward concrete changes, as those that recognize the need for action first will get the best deals...The point being, there is no easy way out."
Neff's predictions in the 50-page report vary depending on the circumstances in which the companies find themselves.
Neff, for instance, predicted Apple, which uses chips from Motorola and IBM that currently top out at 1GHz, will switch to Intel, whose chips run at 2.5GHz, to get a performance boost and gain more customers. There's a better than 80 percent chance Apple will make the jump in two to four years, he said. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:21
|
|
Note that it is only an analyst's prediction.
But it also doesn't mean that, if it's true, Apple is going x86.
Intel has the capability to design multiple processors, and does so (Pentium 4, Xeon, StrongARM, XScale, Pentium III-T, etc), so they can design new chips as well. The most likely scenerio if Intel makes Apple chips is to use a modified version of x86, IMO. They wouldn't be compatible with PC chips, or PC software, which would allow Apple to continue to have a stranglehold on their hardware.
The downside is that means existing PowerPC applications would not be compatible. I don't see that as a real possibility anyway, Apple just forced applications to be redone to run under OS X, they're not going to force them to recompile them all for a new instruction set a couple years later.
So either Intel would use a modified x86, and force everyone to recompile for a new instruction set, or they'll somehow license PowerPC and develop a new chip on that. This is highly unlikely, IMO.
So, to counter the analyst, I think that if anyone other than Motorola is going to win the chip contract, it'll be IBM. IBM makes PowerPC chips already.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|