 |
Do you accept the new way of counting active citizens
This poll is closed. |
| Yes, signups every month |
   |
8 |
20.51% |
| Yes, signups every other month |
   |
6 |
15.38% |
| Yes, but signups every [insert your idea here] |
   |
1 |
2.56% |
| No, keep the current system |
   |
13 |
33.33% |
| No, I propose a different system not described here |
   |
2 |
5.13% |
| Abstain/Banana/Other/BoogaWoogaWooga |
   |
9 |
23.08% |
| Total: |
39 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
disorganizer
|
|
Bavaria (Fanatika)
Jun 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
I abstained just to view the result ;-)
my 2c:
you should combine election restrictions with the re-signup. only persons who re-signed up until 1 week before the elections will be able to vote in them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
wervdon
|
|
I voted against it. I dislike any system which will present us with persistant manditory "domestic nag" to stay involved. One sign up is plenty to vote. Being reasonably active is enough to run for an office. Besides, as it was pointed out this would violate the bill of rights, and even if it didn't, it'd need to be an ammendment to alter the voting requirements in my opinion at least.
To sum up, Id rather not have to remember repetitive redundant sign up processes, and my guess is at least a few people would end up getting excluded by it because of their sporadic real life schedules or their own forgettfulness.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by jdd2007
a month may be too short, but surely you have three seconds every sixty days ... |
jdd - a lot of us are very lazy; that is the very reason I am on the 'Net instead of doing work.
You can fight apathy, but why bother?
EDIT: Having read this and related threads thoroughly, I agree with civman's thoughts that the amendment attached to this could disallow people from voting, even though they actually COULD vote. In this way not only is it not fair on some who want to participate but don't have the presenc of mind to seek help on how to do so, but it is essentially pointless. If we have no means of enforcing such an idea, what is it there for? At least the census we have at the moment is non-binding, and more for information purposes.
Last edited by MrWhereItsAt on 26-07-2002 at 18:54
|
|
|  |
 |
|
disorganizer
|
|
Bavaria (Fanatika)
Jun 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
at the moment its 14-11 against the censuses like they are held now. i wonder why the other poll seems to come out in favor of the censuses.
now what should i do?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
disorganizer
|
|
Bavaria (Fanatika)
Jun 2002 time: 05:21
|
|
i would like to see a statement of the president in here on this matter!
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|