 |
|  |
 |
|
Goingonit
|
 |
Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Apr 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
I'm against changing history usually, but for this case I'd make an exception - the 20m Russian casualties directly from the war, plus the 6m from the Holocaust, plus the ~30m casualties in other parts of the world, are too big a sacrifice not to stop if you had the chance.
I think if the Mensheviks were propped up in Russia and the October Revolution was a failure, that would take away a large part of the impetus for Fascism. As well, drastically altering the Treaty of Versailles would help the Weimar significantly and reduce anger in Germany. Finally, if the Dutch ceded Indonesia to Japan, they would have had no need to fight for their industrialization, saving millions of Chinese and Japanese civilians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
Why should the dutch have given Indonesia to japan? One foreign power to another? Appeasement didn't work against Hitler, and iot would not have against hirohito.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dan Severn
|
|
Wellborn, Texas The Warrior Dennis Miller
May 2001 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
Dan Severn, even the highest ever mentioned number of 20mln of Soviet citizens that died during the war is silly, as Stalin counted into that ones that died during the Great Hunger period. 27 milions is absurd.
Anyway, lets say that 15 mlns died. Imagine how many Soviets would be left after the war if they fought on their own... Anyway, this number also contains collaborants of Hitler., and the number of those killed by Soviets themselves. |
I'm not sure what you mean. Do you really think that the Russians could have defeated the nazis without any help? If that is so, why did stalin keep begging for another front? He would have profitted more from conquering all of europe, had he been able to. To win against the soviets, it would not have been necessary to kill every last one of them, if that's what you're saying. Like you said, many fought on the side of hitler. Doesn't sound like undying loyalty to the SU to me. The Russians came within a hair's breadth of collapse in 1941. Had Hitler taken Stalingrad, Moscow, or Leningrad, the war would have been all but over. It was not until 1943 that the soviets began to turn the tide on the eastern front. The coincides with the allied invasion of italy, BTW.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Goingonit
|
 |
Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Apr 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
Hitler and Hirohito were fighting for essentially different reasons. Japan was fighting WWII because it was rapidly running out of materiel to supply its economy for industrialization. Japan, a country with a very small landmass, had 80 million people and precious few resources, especially oil and rubber. Meanwhile, the Americans were neing protectionist and selling to them less and less. If they had not thought it necessary to fight for these things, they would not have entered the war.
And what I meant by changing the treaty of Versailles is eliminating war reparations, which, though they were not paid in full, still contributed in large part to the hyperinflation that plagued Germany, and also by not allowing the French to occupy the Ruhr (which they did until 1923.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sandman
|
 |
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001 time: 05:21
|
|
I find it ridiculous that some posters are justifying the Second World War for the 'science'.
There are at least as many inventions created during peacetime as during wartime. The only difference is that war inventions are given a special significance, whereas peacetime inventions are just 'inventions'. That's why people tend to assume that wars speed up technological development.
Telephones, television, electricity, cars, railways are all peactime inventions.
Looking at all these examples above, it's hard to imagine a situation where these technologies would NOT evolve into items similar to which we have today.
For every war technology with peactime applications, there is at least one which is completely worthless.
Examples include the bouncing bomb, nerve gas, advanced propeller aircraft (got superseded by jet), and V1 flying bombs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Goingonit
|
 |
Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Apr 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: giving territory to japan? BAD IDEA. what most of you westerners fail to realize is that the japanese during that time were... harsh... to put it mildly, to people they colonized.
their treatment of korea was nothing short of brutal, and their destructive rule of both korea and china are probably very close to stalin's abuse of the soviet people.
and you propose to give japan territory to avert a pacific war? to hell with that. they deserved every single bit of the destruction they received in the pacific war-- including the atomic bombs.
and the atomic bombs, well, the civilians didn't deserve it. it's just that the bombers missed choice military targets because of politics. |
I really don't have any answer for you, unfortunately - I just proposed that as something I believed would avert WWII. Maybe a war between America and Japan would not have dragged in the rest of the world, in which case, of course, that would have been preferable.
Furthermore, North Korea has been rather brutal itself in its treatment of its people.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: I really don't have any answer for you, unfortunately - I just proposed that as something I believed would avert WWII. Maybe a war between America and Japan would not have dragged in the rest of the world, in which case, of course, that would have been preferable.
Furthermore, North Korea has been rather brutal itself in its treatment of its people. |
but at least in north korea, the government is by koreans. i won't make excuses for that hellhole. but in north korea, they don't ship off their women to be sex slaves on their front lines, which is what the japanese did to the unlucky korean women. they don't force unwilling young men to be their troops on the front line and use them as connon fodder, which is what japan did to the koreans. they don't try try stamp out every last vestige of korean culture, which is what japan tried to do. they don't drag random koreans to be servants for soldiers on the battlefield where they were often treated with no respect, often humiliated by being forced to drink body fluids or just doing dangerously stupid, like the japanese did to the koreans.
north korea's brutality is no different from that of a failing communist state with no alernative.
japan's brutality was like that of the nazis.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
Would this include stopping the rise of Hitler, and the holocaust?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:21
|
|
Serb,
you arguements, for the most part (though some do have some merit), are complet and utter horse sh*t that depend on butchering my arguements to even stand up. I stand by everything that I said, and your poor arguements just hilighted your desperetness to try and counter the harsh truth that I said.
I would just like to reiterate that if there was no western front, Nazi Germany could of concentrated all its resources on the Soviet Union and crush it. Perhaps later tonigt, if i get time, i will espose the numorous flaws in your arguements. It would be nice if some people knowlegable on the subject would do some of this in the mean time, a few people already have, I noticed.
Kman
EDIT: I can see why you spent so much time writing. A hollywood writer would need at least that much time to concoct such fiction...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Let's set the record straight by pointing out that most of the onerous and humiliating conditions of the Versailles treaty were vehemently opposed by Wilson. He literally almost fought to the death against punishing Germany severely, since the crusade to win support for his fourteen points nearly cost him his life.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|