 |
|
hahntsak
|
|
oakland, ca
Aug 2002 time: 21:22
|
|
btw if they had canadians they'd have to allow breakoff in form of civil war /succession [quebec] ..
of course modders are welcome to make uu:
RCMP, boomerrangers, Swissguards, etc... oohhh hey lichtensten accountants...[evilgrin]
what would portugese have for uu?
mayans have possible uu...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ducki
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sheik
Israel should have been in PTW. I would say first make sure Israel is added then add Portugal, Incas (or Mayas), and Tibetans. |
I'm curious - is there some online source you can point me to that would support this claim of Israel(a nation created in 1948) being a "world power" or a "great empire" as compared to England, Spain, America, etc?
I keep seeing support for this, but I don't see any historical support for it.
Anyone got any links about the Hebrew/Israeli empires of old?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
hahntsak
|
|
oakland, ca
Aug 2002 time: 21:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
Inca
Leader: Emperor Manco Cupac (Ataphulpa's ceremonial successor, who valiently, though unsucessfully, fought Spanish for many years from stronghold in the mountains.)
UU: Sun Warrior 3.1.1 (archer)
Religious, Expansionist.
Maya
Leader: ???
UU: Plumed Archer (as in AoE2) 2.1.2
Comercial, Scientific (They were the only Native Americans with a sophisticated written language.)
Mali
Leader: the guy who went to Mexico
UU: ???
Comercial, Expansionist?
Polynesians
Leader: King Kamehameha
UU: Double Canoe 1.2.3 (Can hold 3 units instead of 2) (galley)
Expansionist, Comercial?
Poland
Leader:Prime Minister Leech Walesha (sp?)
UU: Hussar Cavalry 6.2.4
Industrious?, Comercial?
Hebrews
Leader: King David
UU: Slinger 3.1.1 (archer)
Religious, Millitaristic |
hebrews, okay , same for incan, and i believe mali-songhai is okay, but the guy went to Mecca, not Mexico on his pilgrimage... Llech Walesa, led solidarity but not midieval period that uu [which i've seen around] comes from perhaps Ladislas Jagiello instead? maya is okay but i believe having incas and aztec might bump them... besides lack of leader... but i thiunk they're okay [demand for netherlands might further that bump] i like polynesian is good choice, but on polys and hebrews, the uu - i haven't seen either one. but i'd like either one!
good choices anyway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
HolyWarrior
|
|
My 8 for the next expansion:
Incas, Scots, Dutch, Portugese, Huns, Byzantines, Mali/Ghana, Khmers. Perhaps the Maya in place of one, but their leaders are largely unknown.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HolyWarrior
My 8 for the next expansion:
Incas, Scots, Dutch, Portugese, Huns, Byzantines, Mali/Ghana, Khmers. Perhaps the Maya in place of one, but their leaders are largely unknown. |
hi ,
only seven please , you have to keep room for the barbarians
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Yahweh Sabaoth
|
 |
The Heavens
Dec 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HolyWarrior
My 8 for the next expansion:
Incas, Scots, Dutch, Portugese, Huns, Byzantines, Mali/Ghana, Khmers. Perhaps the Maya in place of one, but their leaders are largely unknown. |
Forget those Huns. What'd they ever do besides pillage and burn? How about the Songhai, or Sigilmasa, to add a little to Africa? Or maybe the Sioux, for old times' sake? Nez Pearce perhaps? Uh...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
High_Lord
|
 |
Potsburg, Upper Bongolia
Sep 2002 time: 23:22
|
|
they should put in Scottish, Portugese,Hebrew,Canadien,Dutch,Mayan,Incan,and BONGOLIAN!!!
Last edited by High_Lord on 31-12-2002 at 14:08
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Yahweh Sabaoth
|
 |
The Heavens
Dec 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Centauri18
Portugal. Definitely. Without Portugal, there would be no Brazil. And Israel ought to be added. They are a very important part of history. And the Incas ought to be there too. I mean, without them the Aztecs could expand right into South America with nothing to stop them (I played a world-map game with correct starting locations once), and even though the Spanish conquered the Incas (easier than the Atecs, certainly) they still stirke me as an important civilization.
Cadana or Australia separate civs? Why not? Well, the Iriquois took up Canada in one game I played, but Australia as a civ? Hmm. Have you guys even considered that Australia was originally an English prison colony? |
Yeah, those Canucks and those Aussies don't deserve their own Civ!
Seriously, prejudice slurs aside, I'd say that neither of those countries truly warrant their own Civ, due to their consistent subservience too, even after independence, Britain. We could argue this point of course, but they're part of the same market bloc and (generally) endorse the same foreign policy (although Canada is notably more pacifist than either Britain or Australia).
The Aborigonies, though, that's an idea...
How about the Iniuts or Eskimos?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|