 |
|
Kalgacus
|
|
After PTW's released, there may be the ability to add another 7 civs. The question in the poll is, which civs should they be?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sheik
|
|
Israel should have been in PTW. I would say first make sure Israel is added then add Portugal, Incas (or Mayas), and Tibetans.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
andy_of_denial
|
|
Austria-Hungary and Holland.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
King of Rasslin
|
|
Tibet!!!
I can't believe we don't have a kung fu unit, so we NEED to have Tibet! 
Actually, I find it surprising that we have Persia, the Arabs, Ottomans, and the Carthaginians and not Israel! I find this unfair to Israel, since it is a very good strategic location in its position. Go Israel!
Incas should be in. We need a South American civ, so let's put them in for geographic purposes. Not that they really did anything. 
Besides wooden shoes, windmills, dikes, and tulips, what exactly have the Dutch done? Why, I would rather choose POLAND over the Dutch! 
Actually, Poland would be a very good civ to have, since they are a very underrated civ in Europe. Their cavalry took out a few tanks in WWII, so they should have a cheap ghetto version of the cavalry that costs very little but has few hps.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
King of Rasslin
|
|
Brazil included? Only if Portugal is put in first!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Axis Kast
|
|
I, for one, propose the addition of new civilizations as part of a larger package – “The Lost Civilizations.” This title covers ground that would allow us to explore several civilizations no longer a part of our world (or narrowly not) within the Civ III experience. Seven pertinent choices come to mind: the Confederate States of America (UU: CS cavalry, early submarine), the Kingdom of Austria-Hungary (UU: hussar, grenadier), the Kingdom of Siam (UU: elephant archer), the Kingdom of Greater Serbia (UU: grenadier, citizen’s militia), the Boer Republics (UU: Boer), the Inca Empire (UU: eagle warrior), and the Kingdom of Aragon-Castille (UU: man-at-arms, late crusaders?).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000
time: 07:22
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Hagbart
Technologies around the corner?? What technologies do they need to make a TBS like civ4?
panag are you just posting this to raise your postcount? |
hi ,
if they really wanted something "new" they should wait , there are new graphics programs , new types of ram , newf working tools , .... etc , ...
say , about increasing postcount , are you maybe not doing that , ......
example > "woohoo 400 posts" , ....
before you trow a rock at someone , look in the mirror , ....
have a nice day 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Beren
|
 |
Holland
Mar 2002
time: 06:22
|
|
If you want to include any Sub-Sahara civilization I think you must go for Mali (certainly not Zululand.)
I was convinced to choose for Ethiopia for a while (or whatever spelling you choose to use), but there is a crucial breakthrough that made me change my mind. I heard about Mali. It has been proved that even before Columbus reached America, Mali did and traded with the Aztecs. Gold analysis shows that the gold used in the Aztec temples is from Mali origin. The king of Mali himself decided to set sail to America and left his kingdom to his brother (he never returned).
Arab historians even report that when the Mali king went on his journey to Mecca, he took with him so much gold, that the Arab gold market collapsed. In short: the king (I think we are supposed to name him sultan) of Mali was a very rich man.
I think what is part of the explanation that people want Ethiopia is that Ethiopia is christian. On the other hand, Ethiopia too is a good choiche, but in my opinion it is just second best.
I choose Inca, because I think it was truly a civilized country and has as much (if not more) right to be included.
I choose for Thai/Khmer, because that civilisation has been neglected.
All those civs in the middle east will make it very crowded in the area. The hittites were impressive, but short-lived. Armenia is not a bad idea, but never impressive. Lydia only invented coins, nothing else was done there. Assyria could be used, Israel couldn't (There too damn small and didn't achieve a thing, except when they were already conquered: at that time they had some religious inovations.)
I didn't vote for Poland, maybe I should have. Maybe it should have been Lithuana.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22.
Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-08-2002 01:53
, not all the way correct , that would mean they would use "old" industry tools , so its better they wait a bit , there are new technologies around the corner , ....
|