 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ckweb
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
We give them real issues, but the spin would be there even if we didn't. And any policy "concessions" or changes we made would allow the fundamentalists to expand their power. So they don't give us much choice in the matter. |
I disagree. Take Iran, for instance. Iran is increasingly moving towards a more open and free society. Overall, the citizens of the Iran do not support the radical Islam espoused by the Ayatollahs. But, as long as the US continues to interfere in the region, the citizens of Iran will support the Ayatollahs and their stance against the US. If the US left the region alone, or supported Palestinian statehood more rigourously, you take the issues right from under the Ayatollahs. Their rhetoric ceases to be effective and Iranians could move forward into a free and democratic, moderate state, which would serve as a model to other states in the region. In general, people tend towards moderation . . . I am confident that the vast majority of people in the Arab states, once suitably enfranchised, employed, and empowered would overthrow and purge radical elements in their societies. They would exist in those states only as radicalism exists in the US: on the fringe and ineffective.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Frogger
Or maybe bin Laden wouldn't even be bin Laden...he'd be heading up the family biz.
Picture it this way, MtG.
You've got Xian fundies in the States who are convinced that the UN is the tool of Satan, etc. etc., and that the UN somehow controls the US gov't.
But the level of anti-UN terrorism is pretty low. Maybe it would be higher if more reasonable people believed the propaganda...because it was closer to being true. |
You have a definite point, but despite the abysmal level of public education in the US, the problem with our fundy carpet chewers is that they're so far out of the mainstream (in a mostly secular, material, who-gives-a-**** society) that they don't have any appeal. If the ZOG and the NWO is real, and our media is run by Jews, who cares as long as we can play civ, get laid, afford beer and pizza, or whatever floats your particular boat? The US is by and large an apathetic society, at least in political and religious terms. The levels of discontent here aren't critical.
It's no coincidence, though, that the two biggest risings of the KKK followed major economic upheavals, where mass frustration and rage looked for convenient targets.
So I still don't think it's a matter (using the US/UN example) of how real the ZOG is, but whether there's enough wrong in our lives for us to believe that there's a convenient source of those problems we can strike back at.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ckweb
I disagree. Take Iran, for instance. Iran is increasingly moving towards a more open and free society. Overall, the citizens of the Iran do not support the radical Islam espoused by the Ayatollahs. But, as long as the US continues to interfere in the region, the citizens of Iran will support the Ayatollahs and their stance against the US. If the US left the region alone, or supported Palestinian statehood more rigourously, you take the issues right from under the Ayatollahs. Their rhetoric ceases to be effective and Iranians could move forward into a free and democratic, moderate state, which would serve as a model to other states in the region. In general, people tend towards moderation . . . I am confident that the vast majority of people in the Arab states, once suitably enfranchised, employed, and empowered would overthrow and purge radical elements in their societies. They would exist in those states only as radicalism exists in the US: on the fringe and ineffective. |
Actually, this is another interesting subject, because the Shiite fundamentalism of Khomeini and Khamanei is quite different, and the Iranian people have a much different cultural legacy and modern history than do the arabs. It's also 12:30 am, and I have to get up early to try to get my ass across the US border and to work in the morning.
Tomorrow, or during the week, perhaps, I can try to dig this up and make a non-9/11 thread out of it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alexander's Horse
|
 |
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970 time: 15:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
According to the chart I have, 4 Austrailians were killed, although I have only two of the Aussie's names, Yvonne Kennedy, 62, of Sydney, and Andrew Knox, 30, of Adelaide. |
Ya, Mrs Kennedy was on the plane that crashed into the Pentagon. The poor woman had just retired and was on her first holiday post retirement visiting friends in the States.
Andrew Knox was the young guy who managed to get a phone call out to family in Australia before the Tower he was trapped in collapsed. He was one of the people caught above the impact. He worked for one of the big stock market managed fund companies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ckweb
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Actually, this is another interesting subject, because the Shiite fundamentalism of Khomeini and Khamanei is quite different, and the Iranian people have a much different cultural legacy and modern history than do the arabs. |
That is no doubt true . . . you obviously have a certain expertise on the region. However, both types of fundamentalism are able to utilize US foreign policy to generate public support and enflame it to the point of radicalism.
Look at the US, as an example . . . After 9/11, the interference of foreign individuals on its soil, the Gov't was suddenly able to pounce on widespread fear and misinformation to deny certain public freedoms and commit acts, however justifiably, that in any other time it would not have been able to do. Likewise, in the Arab world, if you take away from the fundamentalists the fuel (invasive US policy), then you will ultimately taking away their power. Just as people are increasingly disposed to criticize Bush and his use of power the farther removed 9/11 is from the public consciousness.
Extremism breeds in extreme situations. Take away the extreme situation and there is nothing to be extremist about.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Bin Laden and his followers derive much of their Islamic views from the writings of al Qutb, who took Sayyid Maududi's writings on modern Islamic fundamentalism and expanded on them after his visits to the west in the late 1940's and early 1950's. This was long before the US was a major player in the middle east, and at the very beginning of US prominence in foreign policy, long before there was much to particularly hate us over.
|
Depends on your definition of early 50s. In 53, the US backs a coup that overthrows a populist government in Iran that was planning to nationalize oil production. Even before the coup, there are anti-US protests (this indicates that anti-US sentiment exists before 53, but also that the coup is not the starting point of anti-US attitudes).
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
The US was picked for two simple reasons - as the most powerful nation on earth, hitting us proved they could hit anyone. The other (and this gives China a big advantage) is that we are extremely easy to infiltrate. I doubt they would have been able to get 19 guys long term visas and into Chinese flight schools. |
There's more to it then that. There is tremendous resentment around the world about the way the US throws its weight around. From the perspective of many people, What the US wants, it usually gets. If a government takes a path that is not accepted by the US then that government risks being overthrown or isolated diplomatically or economically.
The anti-American sentiment may well be fueled by emotions, such as envy or disgust at Ameican culture, but it is also fueled by specific actions taken by the US government.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|