 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Paul Hanson
Why, thank you everyone.
And Paiktis, can you remember what it was you said about England that pissed everyone off? Frankly, it must have been something pretty bad, because we English don't get pissed off too easily when it comes to jibes about our country. |
I just said that Greece is better than England. That was enough apparently.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Apparently not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
It would be a comforting thought.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Refering to the trolling or to the offended?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
It is called excessive use of innouendos coupled with a slight cover of irony. Pretty widely used in my parts of the woods. I apologize for the confusion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lars-E
|
|
Oh, is that what it is? I guess Europeans don't feel good about themselves.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cgannon64
|
|
I didn't even read this thread. I am just awed at the fact that a thread titled, "Why are Non-Americans such Gay *****?" could NOT be shut down, even after 77 posts. And the people at CivFanatics call you sheep who mod everything????
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cgannon64
|
|
Really Immortal? I never knew that, it seems to be almost nonexistent. The worst is at GameFAQs.com. If you go there and make a thread titled "I am C Jay C's Son" (NOTE: C Jay C created the site) you will be booted. IF you mention pirated games, you get suspended. Mention drugs, suspended. That place is a police state.
Still, I think the integrity of this thread is nonexistent. IT has a good point, but calling them all gay ***** makes you sound like an idiot
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
el freako
|
 |
Bristol, European Union
Oct 1999 time: 05:22
|
|
That article is a very good summary of the current situation in Europe and America.
It is also easy to see that Europeans and Americans are partially blinded to the merits of the other's way of thinking by the success of their own methods in their primary goals in the last half-century - military might and an umcompromising attitude were a sucess for the US in defeating communism and the USSR whilst negociation and the pooling of sovereignty have been successful in building europe's amazing peace.
However the article only focuses on the medium term (the next 50 years or so) and America will not stay powerful forever.
Military power comes from economics power - although you can be an economic power but not a military one it is almost impossible to be a military power without an economy to back it up.
The US's share of global output has been falling for half a century - that means that eventually power will shift (I do not mean that the US will lose power itself, just it's current monopoly on it) and then the US will need either a militarily strong europe as it's ally or a strong system of international law in order to protect itself from erosion of it's global influence.
Ultimately this could mean a form of 'Transatlantic Union' of the entire west to counter the global power of China & India in the 22nd century.
Last edited by el freako on 16-09-2002 at 01:29
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|