 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
The Germans can't just do a U-turn and say they will support the US against Iraq, because it would be illegal. They are not allowed to attack another country or allow their any country to use bases in their territory to attack another country unless there is a (successful) UN vote on the matter. This was a consition of reunification I think.
So I don't see how Schroeder can do anything else...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
In the United States there has been a trend in politics towards a more moderate possition on both sides, conseritives and liberls. Also to many polls here in the US indicate that many people hold conseritive stance on some issues and a liberl stance on others. Also during the 2000 election, both Bush and Gore try to appeal to moderate views, since candiates have a better chance of winning if they can get in the other party to vote for them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I think we do need this alliance untill we get a coherent european army. (and not just a rapid reaction force).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
I categorically disagree. If Schroeder does an about-face on this, the anti-war German people will be infuriated with the SDP. The Greens can then use the memory of the incident to gain ground with left-leaning voters who oppose the war. They would be able to pick up seats (most at the expense of the SDP, I'm sure), and put them in a more powerful position. And guess what? The SDP would still have to work with them, especially then, to form a majority government. |
In the longrun the SDP has an option that the Greens don't, namely selecting a coalition partner from the center rather than the left. The Greens might well end up in a weaker position even if they picked up seats, as they are too far to the left to have much of a choice in coalition partners, and thus would remain out of the government if they won't work with the SDP.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:22
|
|
quote: What's a vacuum bomb? |
Something SF to add yet more irony in an already ironically meant statement? I could have chosen planet blasters instead, but these would have destroyed the US as well.
quote: In the longrun the SDP has an option that the Greens don't, namely selecting a coalition partner from the center rather than the left. The Greens might well end up in a weaker position even if they picked up seats, as they are too far to the left to have much of a choice in coalition partners, and thus would remain out of the government if they won't work with the SDP. |
The option you are talking about is the FDP (liberals).
A party, that's dreaming to get 18%, but keeps getting 5-8%. A party, megalomanic enough to call their chieftain "cancellor candidate", although he hasn't the slightest chance ever to get the 35-40% he would need. A party which called itself formerly "party for the higher salaries", till they realized, how incredibly dumb that is. A party which yells to lower taxes, without the slightest idea, how to refinance this. A party, which needs to seek shelter in anti-semitic statements to gain attention, just to vehemently disclaim them later. A party, which has the nerve to state before the election, that they'll go with anyone willing to take them into government. So very reliable.
An alternative?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|