 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
they burned up whole kurdish villages. how is this "shielding"?
anyway you're discredited by your apathy for the slaughetered by turkey little children and women.
have to go now.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Frogger
If I knew the activity of U235 I'd be able to do some order-of-magnitude calcs for this... |
There is also the problem that 30 pounds of that stuff may be a critical mass. The exact amount apeers to be classified but its around there, maybe as much as 50 poounds.
The stuff isn't just a beta emiter. Its an alpha emitter PLUS it fissions spontaneously. Now it could be that the total package weighed 30 pounds including the lead. Fraud is possible as well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
That picture was on the Reuters site.
http://www.reuters.com/news_article...StoryID=1508712
If you click on the small image you go to the large one.
Here is the caption for the jpg
quote: Captured weapons-grade uranium weighing more than 33 pounds is on display at the paramilitary police headquarters of southeast province of Sanliurfa, Turkey, September 28, 2002. Turkish gendarmes seized the uranium and detained two men accused of smuggling the material, Anatolian Agency said. Authorities believe the uranium came from an eastern European country and has a value about $5 million. Photo by Anatolian/Reuters |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
I wouldn't be so quick to wave this off. I would suspect that for every shipment of this stuff captured en route that at least 6 or 7 gets through.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:22
|
|
Gatekeeper:
The inspectors bit is only wrong in a semantic sense. Saddam kicked the Americans out, said the rest could stay since an "international" group didn't need to have Americans in it. The Iraqis then continued to obstruct and interfere, to the point the inspectors were getting nothing done. Lawyers in the US would call it a constructive kicking out, just like a constructive contract or constructive termination of employment, so I don't have a problem with that aspect of Rumsfeld's statement.
I do think it "interesting" to say the least, that people like Zinni and Schwarzkopf say to work all the diplomatic angles first and coalition build, while the Bush Chickenhawks say "we're going to kick ass, whether you come along or not"
I'm beginning to think that this is all strategy, and a way to keep the pre-election focus on the possibility (which won't likely materialize) of war, instead of on the economy and issues the Dems would like to raise.
I think the hawk bunch are too vocal for them not to be sending a message - it's just too scripted, compared to the much more serious, generally quiter and more measured tone the first time around.
I'm just waiting for all the "it'll be another Vietnam" crowd to show up, like they did last time, and then the drama will be complete. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|