 |
Is this Amendment ready to be added to the CoL?
This poll is closed. |
| Yes |
   |
33 |
89.19% |
| No |
   |
2 |
5.41% |
| Abstain |
   |
2 |
5.41% |
| Total: |
37 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
UnOrthOdOx
|
 |
Hello....
Jun 2002 time: 22:22
|
|
Is this amendment reay to be added to the CoL?
Amendment VII:
The purpose of this amendment is to provide instructions on what to do in case a Great Leader(GL) should emerge during battle. This amendment shall be an exception to any part of the current Code of Laws, especially with regards to timing of turnchats/turnthreads.
1. The GL should immediately(once the game continues) be dispatched to a safe place for protection, preferrably to the city where he will complete his work.
2. It is recommended that as soon as the GL emerges(or as soon as feasible) that the game be stopped to decide the fate of the GL, as well as the destination city where he will meet that fate.
3. The President, Vice-President, SMC and City Planner, should discuss options for the GL. They should then poll the people, and the most popular option shall win. A pre-poll discussion thread can be started at their discretion, and should last no longer than three days.
4. The game will then restart as soon as practicable after the poll is complete.
5.The poll should last no longer than three days and follow the polling standards already listed in the Code of Laws.
6. In the event of a prolonged war, a Pre-poll may be used in place of stopping the game. Pre-poll results will remain current until the winning choice is completed and no longer available or there is a new choice to decide upon.
Options:
Yes
No
Abstain
For the purposes of this poll, abstain votes will be counted as 'no' towards the final %
Poll will close in 5 days
Edit: Discussion per NYE request:Amendment discussion: Use of Great Leaders
[*]
Last edited by UnOrthOdOx on 04-10-2002 at 17:49
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dejon
|
|
In my games, I always know what I'd do with a GL, should one appear. I don't see why this community cannot do the same. Make a minister in charge of holding a perpetual discussion and polls, and then he includes the standing popular choice in his orders. Not sure which minister this should be though. I see the prescribed delays in this amendment as unnecessary.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
UnOrthOdOx
|
 |
Hello....
Jun 2002 time: 22:22
|
|
Yes. I shouldn't have numbered them. Will not in the future.
Edit: The MoE amendment will be discussed further, fixed, and polled again later
Last edited by UnOrthOdOx on 04-10-2002 at 23:05
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|