 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
History Guy
|
 |
Reads too many books...
Oct 2001 time: 23:22
|
|
Well, this is my personal opinion.
We are somewhat foolish in allowing these beaten civilizations to survive, once they are down to two or three, or in the case of Persia, one city. We should rid ourselves of bad business in future, so as to save ourselves from future (pitiful) nuisance, and to take as much potentially valuable land as possible. In my opinion, we should have destroyed the Americans and the French when we had the chance. In the case of the former, belligerents are now doing that themselves, when we ourselves should be in there taking what is left of Lincoln's land, instead of simply sitting back and watching it all fall. I believe that we should have destroyed Lincoln while we had the chance, instead of letting the Aztecs do it instead. I also think that we should have taken out the pitiful remains of the French "Empire", but now it may be simply foolhardy to try it again, especially if Bismarck is on good terms with Miss d'Arc. Finally, I believe that there is really no reason in the world that we should leave the Persians around, with only one city. It is good business to do away with such problems, even as only an example. The idea of leaving the Persians with a single city strikes me as remotely pitiful, and it is my opinion that we should have occupied Hamadan and executed that war criminal Xerxes, and then settled down to build up our culture. I think that if we start a war to take down an enemy, we shouldn't leave the job half finished, and Persia is an excellent example. If we hadn't just now sent our terms, I'd say we should go in and mop them up for good, it only makes sense.
As for the future, I do think that we must have an up to date defensive/offensive standing army on our hands at all time, especially now that our German friends are building up their own forces, and have a special hatred for our own "unclean race". I don't think, though, that we should in future look for war, but if we are faced with war to save our people, we must not shy away from it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
E_T
|
 |
Orlando, Florida
Mar 2001 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Meshelic
The Persian's have been utterly defeated by us in battle and have given in to our demands; they now hold only one city (Hamadan) which is north and borders the Greeks, Germans, and Aztecs.
|
Persia has four (4) Cities left: Hamadan, Sardis, Sidon & Sameria
quote:
As I speak the Aztec's and American's are fighting a fierce battle for domination of the American highlands, and soon we shall see Lincoln capitulating. Although progress is being made to "liberate" the American cities from potential Aztec rule, intel predicts that America shall fall to the Aztecs shortly.
|
We should be agle to beat them to Boston and Maybe New York.
quote:
While this is going on, we must discuss our options for the future: Some speak of warring with our weak neighbor France. Others look north to the land of the infidel Germans as territory ripe for conquest. And still others propose we draft plans for an invasion of England...
|
Germany had Gunpowder, but it is not known if they have Saltpeter.
quote:
What is our Manifest Destiny and what direction will that destiny carry us? |
France can wait. we need to consolidate our new holdings and build up our Infrastructure & Military Capabilities. If we don't, we run the great risk of over extending ourselves and having some come and take our well gotten gains away from us and with relative ease. I'm not advocating beating our swords back into plowshares, but making more plowshares, so at some future date, we can beat them into swords.
Otto will get his and he'll be the one who makes the wrong move. Then Berlin wil become ours. It will be before the end of the Middle Ages, but it will come. He's afraid of us now, buthe won't be for too much longer.
E_T
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:22
|
|
Great to see the war academy so keen as to be planning the next skirmish, but..... isn't anyone else sick of it?
I'd love to see us stop and consolidate for a bit. Imagine, with the land we have, Marketplaces and Libraries in most of our cities would give us a great boost, and workers would greatly increase our production.
I too share the dream of taking the deserts and mountains near France, but they are worthless to us right now (unless we find Saltpeter there). i would rather we built up, and unleasehed with Cavalry down the line, once we have developed into a true superpower. Right now we are but Mongols, laying waste to vast areas without much to show for it at all. Let us stop living in shanties in the disease-ridden jungle and transform our nation.
War is good. War gets us lots of things, but we can only go on with the pitiful tech we have for so long. We are learning Education, soon Music Theory and others. Let us put these cultural developments to use to strengthen our cities' claim to fame. With better civilisation comes better ideas, and better weaponry.
Let us stop the wars. for the sake of future wars!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Donegeal
|
 |
Apolyton's Resident Law Enforcement Officer. Founder of the Glory of War, Champions of Apolyton!
Jul 2002 time: 05:22
|
|
I would like to repute the thought that the only reason we have had such military success is because we have been picking on "weak" civs. We have truly only fought three civs: the Americans, the French and the Persians (I don't count the Germans as it was so pathetic).
Of these three civs we only had an advantage over one of them, the Persians. They had no Iron and could not stand up to even our Swordmen at the time.
The other two (America and France), we fought on even ground.
America was fought with Archer stacks ( @ Unortho) and spearmen. We both had some of each. We won do to stragety and the fact that we had more.
France was fought with Archer stacks, Spearmen and Swordmen. Again, we both had some of each (hell, Rheims was taken back by a warrior). Again, we won do to stragety.
Both the French and American wars are examples of what I call "whacking a civ". We whacked them and they turned pathetic. We whack Greece, Germany, Aztec, English, Rome and Russia in the same mannor, and they all become pathetic. All of Abananaba becomes a mop up job.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Robber Baron
|
 |
Commonwealth of Commonsense
Jun 2002 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Meshelic
Speaking of other civs, what is the likelihood of the Germans taking a stance against us in the case of this hypothetical invasion? |
Great question, Meshelic. If we do decide to proceed against the French, it seems to me we have to weigh the possibility of third party aggression, from either the Aztecs or the Germans. That scenario would make it impossible to do any substantial building (courthouses, marketplaces, cathedrals). We now have a vast and potentially rich hinterland, but we're not yet using it fully.
I'm a bit hesitant to plunge into the next phase of imperialist expansion. France looks tempting, and vulnerable. Can we take it while at the same time buttressing ourselves culturally and economically?
If the French campaign can be an isolated one, we should be able to put it together and execute pretty cheaply.
If we're not sure of this, however, then it becomes a serious proposition. Because we need to have a major building phase, including (IMO) palace/FP placement, a cathedral campaign, and a series of courthouse/marketplace rushes.
What do people think? Are we pretty confident we can hold Otto and Monty in check (via trade agreements and so on), while we take out another layer or two of pink territory?
Nothing should impede or further delay a substantial building campaign. :doitnow:
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:22
|
|
We definetely need the time to er-organize, we can't allow ourselves to be drawn to another war in the near future, we'll do better if we muster our city production towards marketplaces and courthouses, make lots of money with Republic, and attack in the window of Cavalry before Riflemen. We can get the Cav before france gets Nationality, and we'll have plenty of knights and money to upgrade them, then launch an invasion. For now, we must grab NY, and if we can boston too, by using the 4 WC we have south of boston to form a 'blockade' on the SE and south of Boston, if the Aztecs won't attack from the north, we might be able to get Boston before them, and if they get Boston, our blockade will slow their approach to New york (they'll have to go through hills and mountains) and we can have our 2 knights attack it in 3 turns. After that we should definitely stop the wars and consolidate for a while.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aggie
|
 |
Of GOW's half of BOB
Jun 2002 time: 23:22
|
|
We have a peace treaty signed with france from last turn chat, so the earliest the war can take place is 17 or so turns. If it is delayed long enough we could do the same thing with calvary. This attack would even give us slighlty better odds.
knight vs fortified pike is 4:3.75(1,.07:1)
Calvary vs forified musket is 6:5(1.2:1)
and I can just about guarentee we can have calvary before they have upgraded all pike to musket
Of course this depends on us and them having saltpeter
Obviously it is IMPERITVE that we get gunpower fast. so we can see it.
One thing to notice we will have to upgrade about 10 chariots to knights this will cost 1000 total but over 20 turns+ what we have that is less than 1/3 our budget and maybe we'll make some knights.
One thought I've had is this, we could make alliance with russia, why you ask well very simple. If we make alliance with russia 2 things can happen. The french might take that russian city and if the frence did get somebody else to help them it might be against the russians and with luck we could set off a southern war with rome and russia.
Aggie
Last edited by Aggie on 07-10-2002 at 23:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|