 |
|  |
 |
|
dmm1285
|
|
Well, I was going to join a party, but they all seem to have been dispandes except for the CCCP, and I dont agree with some of their ideas, so I present to you:
The Chriron Security Fore (CSF)
Q: Why join any party at all?
A: Some say parties serve no purpose, but I strongly disagree. By joining a party that shares your ideals, your votes will become stronger in the elections as a faction who votes for (mostly) the same people has a larger chancew of getting its choices elected. Parties also encourage participation from lukers and newbies(like myself) as they add more of a roplelaying elemtn to the demo game, particualrly to people with no government position. Fianlly, when electing people to office from a party, you know what their ideals are, making for easy voting.
Q: What is your expericne with Aplaha Centauri and Alien Crossfire
A: I've owned and played both games since they have came out (I even bought virtual pc, a PC emulator for the Mac, to play this game orignally). I have beat the game with almost every faction on transcend and have a very good grasp of the game's tech tree and concepts; anything I dont know I'll be more than happy to learn about.
Q: Will the CSF ever get disbanded?
A: Probablly not. If it turns out that no one elase wishes to join and I'm the only member, I dont mind as people will at least know my in-game poltics. So in short, no.
Q: Enough of the background! What's the CSF all about?!?
We are a pro-millatirsitc, anti-wealth party in the Apolyton government.
We support democracy for governemtn at all points in the game.
The CSF prefers planned economy over FM or green, especially in the beginning of the game to build up our bases. Any base that has a child's chreche will grow by one person every turn if the bas produces >=2 nutrients, we consider this a huge adavantage, and could end up leading to more research over FM in the end. If it is possible to build the Cloning Vats, we definently supoprt a green economey. So, we are anti-FM, but not strongly so.
The CSF is strongly against the wealth social choice. Wealth only creates a weak and complacent army and poplulation without and tangible benefits. We are pro both power and knowlege, depending on the situation. For example, if we are not at war, a relationship with Zakarov would be benfiecial, and the +2 rearch signifiganly lowers the turns of tech research, we are pro-knowlege. However, if we are at war, or build the Cloning Vats(removes negatives of power), the CSF is pro-power.
The CSF is pro thought control, particullary if we are in contol of the Cloning Vats (removes negative support costs). We are not againt using the Eudadomic society choice to improve research, cash flow, and mineral production, but we do not avoacte using it during war time. We are not against using cyernetic in a war againt the gains, ro a faction that has massed a large amount of mind worms.
Q: What is the CSF's stance towards atrocities?
A: We are against atrocities as they do not effectively hurt the enemy's millitary strength, or make it impossible to tkae bases (planet busters). However, we are not agaist nerve stapling, and not agaisnt building punishment speheres if the need arises.
Please post any other questions here. Like I said before, I think it was mistkae to disband all of the parites as they make the game interesting, and I'm soing the best to rectify it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Method
|
 |
/me goes to France
Feb 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by dmm1285
Q: Why join any party at all?
A:By joining a party that shares your ideals, your votes will become stronger in the elections as a faction who votes for (mostly) the same people has a larger chancew of getting its choices elected. |
the old P4 was critisized in election I for voting only for its own members
quote: Originally posted by dmm1285
Please post any other questions here. Like I said before, I think it was mistkae to disband all of the parites as they make the game interesting, and I'm soing the best to rectify it. |
parties were the worst thing to happen to this game. they made it like the C3DG, and promoted bickering. not only that, but they caused many hard feelings towards other people. i'm not sad to see parties go at all.
i don't think you'll get much response here. there were already 2 warmongering parties, both of which disbanded. 1, because it only ever got 2 members, and the other, because they were inactive. everyone here is already either in a party, hates parties, or just chooses not to be in a party.
parties suck
this party sucks
war distracts us from research
the end

Last edited by Method on 16-10-2002 at 01:04
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dmm1285
|
|
Sorry for not aknowleging any parties. As for parties sucking, I'm not saying for you to join or anything. Hell, I dont care if I reamin the only member of the party, Ill try my best for the CDF to have a positive influence on the Apolyton governemt. Aslo, I think the work you are lookin for is debating, not bickering. I'm interested in debating the various social issues with other parties in a calm peaceful way (actually, I dont usually play thought control myself, I aply Eudomia. However, it is usually maligned for no reason, so I decdied to give it a chance). Therefore, good luck to all other parties, and parties rule!
      
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GeneralTacticus
|
 |
of Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2001 time: 15:23
|
|
quote: We are not "robbing" our citizens the freedom of thought, but rather expanding their thought processes through neurochemical 'encouragement'. |
By it's very nature, TC denies people the freedom to think for themselves, even if they do not notice it themselves.
quote: The implementation of Thought Control will allow everyone to see how strong one single idea backed up by hundreds of minds and bodies can be. An untold amount of resources, effort, and energy is wasted by constant bickering and arguing. But with Thought Control in place, everything will be unified into one single drive. |
Now where have we heard this before? This takes us right back to the good old days of Stalin, Hitler and Mao.
quote: This unification of thoughts with the implementation of Thought Control will give the citizens more freedom to see past personal stereotypes and beliefs and transcend to 'group awareness'! |
A group is an artificial and arbitary entity; it cannot think for itself or be aware.
quote: T.C. and Democracy go hand in hand. |
T.C. reverses democracy; the government does not hold power because people support it, but rather, people support the government because it is in power.
quote: Freedom is arbitrary and ethereal. |
Ethereal, yes. Arbitary, no. And simply because it is not something tangible does not mean it is not real, nor that it is not precious.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GeneralTacticus
|
 |
of Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2001 time: 15:23
|
|
quote: The 'Group' is the single most powerful entity on Planet right now. The mass of unsatisfied Peacekeepers band together to collect their scattered and miniscule power and coalesce it into one single universal strength. The group is not "artificial", it merely transcends that which we cannot see or hear or feel.
|
A group cannot think for itself, nor does it have any seperate existance. It exists solely as a collection of individuals, nothing more.
quote: True, those were evil and misdirected individuals....but would you rather have 10,000 bickering and dischordand voices all trying to be right, or 1 single harmonious voice that calms and pacifies untold millions? |
That would depend on whether the 1 voice actually was right. And there would be no way to ensure that.
quote: The government is formed "by the people". Elected officials are appointed by the people and these elected officials steer the populace with Thought Control. |
*SIGH* A democracy becomes entirely nonfunctional when TC is implemented, because it means the government controls the people, not the other way around.
quote: Think of TC as a tool that one would use to tweak society so that it (society) may reach its true potential. |
But who decides what the 'true potential' of society really is? Hitler thought it would be reached by racial purification and extermination. Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot though they could reach it by 'weeding out the class enemy'. In the case of TC, it is highly likely that whoever wields it will make similar errors... and there will be no way imaginable to halt and repair the damage, short of an outside invasion.
EDIT: that was supposed to be 'likely'.
quote: Democracy uses TC whether people like it or not. In the 2000's, a crude form of Thought Control was in place.....it was called "Mass Media". |
Do we have to like it? We're here to escape the mistakes of Earth, not to repeat them on a larger scale.
Last edited by GeneralTacticus on 20-10-2002 at 04:37
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|