 |
Pax Apolytonia?
This poll is closed. |
| To War With France! |
   |
26 |
45.61% |
| To War With Britain! |
   |
2 |
3.51% |
| To War with Both! |
   |
8 |
14.04% |
| Give Peace A Chance! |
   |
21 |
36.84% |
| Total: |
57 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
E_T
|
 |
Orlando, Florida
Mar 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
I support a war only for four reasons:
1) Generate a GA
2) Have a Possible GL
3) Liberate Rheims so that they can join our Jungle Ball league.
4) Liberate the Saltpeter Deposits from France.
I don't want the war for the French Western costal lowlands
Explansion of above:
1) A GA would allow me to get the rest of the needed core city Items into place or with them being close to completion by the end of the GA. THe GA will also Allow us to be doing some actual research for a change, on our own. We have a few Librarues currently (I'll have the list in my Construction Shack City status report for 700AD) and a few more in about 15-20 turns. Because we're getting closer to completeing Printing Press (8 turns left) and we would have to move the slider to 50% of more to have faster results now. So thereby, we are on that course for atleast 8 more turns. If we "pull the strings" in 10 turns, try to limit the war to 5 turns and use the rest of the GA to to get ourselves out of the dark ages.
At this point in time, we should be building Universities & Banks, instead of starting to build Libraries (if not having to Build Cathedrals to take care of happieness issues in our cities) and just finishing Marketplaces. Our Growth is now Pyramid driven and (in some cities) outpaces the construction of the Improvements that promote happiness. We have aquired technologies only though very tough negotiations that were very delecate (and the timeing just right, Thank the Banana!) and costly and our economy wasn't cripples by then, though they could have been.
With GA driven building and economy, I can get us more towards were we should really be at this point in time. The outer Provences are still suffering from near Catastrophic Corrution and run away growth, HOW are wo going to pay for this pipe dream of increasing our presence in the Western seas, when were still getting the Persian Provences out of Catastrophic Corruption.
We have the size, we just don't have the depth to become great. A GA will let us acheive that depth especially in combination with a short war.
2) Rome has nearly completed building JSB and when they do, the others will switch to Smith's Trading and have that completed shortly. Magellins will be taken by who ever's third in that race, unless they haven't gotten Navigation by that time. The one in fourth will get Newtons if they've gotten Theory of Gravity. If not, they'll switch Along with the reat of the lossers) to either Small Wonders or Big ticket Items (Uni or Bank). A timely GL would allow us to get one of these (I prefer Smiths for the money saved). And who knows, the Banana will smile on us and grant us two to three, one for JSB & last for an Army (for two small wonders). But we need to start the war soon, timing is key here and Rome is setting the clock ticks. I was actually expecting to be in the war now (and hoping to cut them off at their wonder seeking knees).
3) We need more 'Cultural Glue' in that area because of Greece, but Rheims puts a spot in it. Having Rheims will help knit that area up just nicely. And they will also be that last City that is elegable for a Jungle Ball Expansion Team.
4) We have only resently learned of the Saltpeter deposits that are in the French territories. If we aquire them, we can sell them and still have a surplus, for just in case one of the deposits runs out. THis also allows us to control those areas of mountains & hills for when Coal is discovered. The western Coastal lowlands doesn't have much of a chance for that at all. And Rubber's much later.
Having the War for just the Objectives of Rheims, Lyons, Besancon, Dijon & Amiens for the cities; the resourses, GA and a possible GL are all that I think that this nation needs ans should do. Anything beyond that is just plain bloodthirsty.
E_T
|
|
|  |
 |
|
E_T
|
 |
Orlando, Florida
Mar 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
How did that happen. Lessen to all, never try to post a long essay after wakeing from a sound sleep and suffer from the effect od stomack acid, you somehow douple post
E_T
Last edited by E_T on 19-10-2002 at 21:03
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
I agree fundamentally with E_T:
We are the biggest civ, and while our army may not be number 1, being human ves us a huge force multiplier: the AI needs a very large numerical superiority to beat a human player:
The lands we have are backwards-we need no more and can handle no more either. We have to build our infrastructure, and a state with a representative form of gov. will work best towards internal development.
I also agree that any future wars must be driven by specific, limited aims, like gaining control of certain cities, wornders, or resource tiles. Wars simply for territorial aggrandizement are not worth it. May I add that we have as of yet discussed the vitory condition we seek to fulfill. The only reason I can see for further gains of cities that contribute nothing is if we aim for dominion or conquest vicotries: if that is what certain individuals want, then say it out loud, don't cloak intentions in mindless sloganeering.
I suport a stroing military for defense and for gaining limited objectives. but creating a realm worthy of this project, not only in size, but in advancement and wealth, should be our top priority: not endless landgrabs.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|