 |
|
Don K Hotay
|
|
Boston
Aug 2001
time: 00:23
|
|
Finally a response. I'm surprised not too many people are really (I mean really) complaining about PTW's lacklusterness. But, I'm sure this will all get better. I mean, we're not dealing with a fourth rate game maker like Activision. This is Firaxis, and they are just as dedicated to their fans as we are to their games.
It better come out soon though, or I might still consider Fedexing PTW up Sid Meier's behind!
Las Vegas Quixote
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Pyrkaige
|
|
quote:
Judging by the way MP performed for me, it will take about 6 months and 50 patches to get the game up to speed. |
Given that people have been able to run MP fairly reliably over LAN connections and that there will be a direct TCP/IP option in the next patch, it seems likely that most people will be able to run it much sooner than that. It would have been nicer to not have to deal with Gamespy at all from the get-go, but hopefully the next patch will resolve that. 
Last edited by Pyrkaige on 03-11-2002 at 04:42
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pyrkaige
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by kring
Mark, can someone please post a transcript or a link to the chat transcript. |
Here's an edited copy of the chat log posted earlier. Some of the questions and responses were moved around to keep them together by topic. The chat was for an hour, and addressed the current problems with MP in PTW as well as other issues.
 Attachment: ptwchat-110102.zip
This has been downloaded 162 time(s).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
canadianbacon
|
 |
British Columbia
Nov 2002
time: 21:23
|
|
No, I'm not blaming Firaxis, there previous products function well and patches were always forthcoming. They are only the developers, more likely its the marketing machine at Infogrames pushing for the End of Oct release.
I know it was 'field' tested, but it still way to buggy even for a 1st release (non beta). For 3 days I've tried, and everybody else I talked to had crash after crash. Someone says 'I actually played a game, one on one, high ping and small world worked'. Next game, same parmameters, it crashes. If there is a 'rule book' on how to get even the simplest game working, lots of people would be interested in knowing it.
I dont know what makes people more upset, the Inability to use the features promised, or if they had to wait till January for it. To me it seems a no brainer, you can't ***** about a product you dont have.
Infogrames is not the only cuslprit in this type of marketing, it seems to be the SOP for game companies, how they get away with it while other industries dont, is beyond me.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001
time: 22:23
|
|
Good points. 2 threads for you:
http://www.apolyton.net/forums/show...&threadid=66350
http://www.apolyton.net/forums/show...&threadid=65999
Some of the other testers helped me get going in about 10 minutes. Once I knew what to shut off, and how to configure I have enjoyed great success. If I were to boil down what to do to have the highest chance of success it would be...
1. Ensure that the people you are trying with are not using any warez version. Some of the warez versions will do nothing but crash. All of the warez versions can be patched, but the patch will not fix the problems for all of them. Unfortunately, this means trying with people you know, since a lot of the warez users will swear on a stack they are legit.
2. Plug your computer directly into the broadband connection. Not broad band? 56K? Sorry, I can't help (I have no experience with them and PTW). Disconnect any router or hub and connect directly to the cable/dsl modem.
3. Turn off any AV or Firewall software. If you are using Win2K or XP you will have to be logged on as admin to do this and stay logged on to play for that session.
4. DO NOT use GameSpy Arcade to start or join games, and ensure the other person is not as well. Start PTW. Select the MP option and start/join games from there.
5. Be patient while moving from the initial game setup screen to the MP setup screen, and again when you launch the game itself. there can be delays as players join before they are actually all there and responsive. Using a second chat program, such as MSM halps a lot so you can tell where people are and whether you should continue waiting. If they crash (to desktop) stop waiting.
If you do this and still cannot get going, then you may be one of the unfortunate few. There was 1 tester who could never host. His ISP blocks port 80(?). He also has problems joining I think.
I have run into 1 person since release who can get into games, but any game he touches is mired in goo, no matter how close and how good the ping. He is on a large institution's network. the developers have been made aware of his situation and will hopefully be able to resolve it.
Once you know that it does work for you, and how to make it work in a worst case, then start playing around with your router and firewall and get the game going though them. It has been done by many of the testers, but some patience is required while you go through the trial and error routine.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
McCasper
|
|
With all this talk about disabling routers, firewalls and any other protections you may have on your computer aren't we missing the point. Just about every other developer of multiplayer internet games get their games working with these barriers in place. These barriers are there for a reason, so that unwanted individuals do not hack into our systems! I don't know about anyone else but I have been "port scanned" extensively since connecting to broadband. I personally would not connect a computer to the internet without a router & personal firewall.
Running a game on port 80 (http) or any known, documented and dedicated port is absurd. I also agree with the comments above about gamespy only forwarding the ip information to the game. There are some very big issues with the multiplayer portion of the game, period! Until they are fixed, it looks like most us us are playing single player but there are also issues with that as well.
While playing one of the largest scenarios in single player, the game would repeatedly either give a general memory error and crash to desktop or reboot the system. Other single player games have worked fine though.
System specs: Athlon 1.4, 512 MB PC2100 Ram, ATI 32 MB radeon & Adelphia Powerlink (~3 megabit download bandwidth).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Edgar Newt
|
|
What are your damages? Return the darn thing if you don't want it.
I am very upset with Firaxis et al., and my postings here will reflect that, but seriously -- what are your damages? Return the darn thing if you don't want to wait for the patches. Or better yet, return it...wait to see if they patch it successfully, then buy it.
Where is your buddy going to law school? Does he mail in his exams to an address in Belize (nothing against Belize by the way)?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002
time: 00:23
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by KizSmurf
Has anyone thought about class aciton lawsuits? Any lawyers out there? My buddy is in his 3rd year in law school and he thinks there may be a case, but is reluctant to give out advice since he is not a lawyer yet. This is B.S. and should not become a legit way to market software, or anything else. Firaxis, I love you, don't be dumb and work with infrogames ever again.
Love Civ 3, Hate PTW, untill its fixed I'm playing Age of Wonders 2
KizSmurf |
I'm a third year law student, and I have to laugh at this (not that I care for or know much about this type of law, I do criminal law,, mind you). don't get me wrong, I'm not happy that it has bugs either
Read the EULA
When you installed the game, you agreed to the EULA which gives you 90 days to return the game for full refund. AFter 90 days, you get nothing, so return it now if you wish. You do have to have the receipt.
Where's the harm there? You agreed to the return procedure, if you don't follow it, its your fault.
So return it or keep it, but decide within 90 days (or earlier to allow for the mail)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jack_www
|
|
Well I have played PTW in single player, and its great. The AI is good enough to give you a good game. Hotseat and PBEM work fine. I like the new civs and units. The only thing that is wrong with it is MP. Many people think it is Gamespy, but I play a lot of games on Gamespy and it works just fine. Trust me there is a lot worst out there. I think it has something to do with the code for transfering the data between computers. I have heard from many that say they beta tested PTW that Infogrames rushed it out of the door before they could fix the problem. I know they will fix it, it is just a matter of time.
Firaxis is better then a lot of game compinies out there. Most only put out one or two patches and thats it, even if there are still bugs in the program. But Firaxis has been listening to people's feedback and making changes to the game to try and make the game a game everyone likes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pachabel
|
|
I was considering a similar lawsuit. You see, sometimes my local Fox channel airs bad programming. I really find it disturbing as I sit there and watch. I think if we banded together we can get them to stop. Or maybe at least one of the executives should come over and change the channel.
I'm with ya. Let's sue Firaxis for selling us a game we wanted to buy, then making us play it repeatedly. The nerve of some companies.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23.
Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-11-2002 03:12
I was really looking forward to MOO3 
|