 |
|  |
 |
|
Havak
|
 |
Swing Low, Sweet Chariots.
Aug 1999 time: 05:23
|
|
quote: Leaving aside the late hit on Larkham and the subsequent 3 points. |
Isn’t this the incident where the hand was broken?
quote: On the whole, the ball reached a speedster in a fairly ad hoc fashion and then it was on. |
That is a wonderful description – ‘hopeful’ rugby we should perhaps call it? 
quote: I'll take your word for all those changes because I don't know. |
You can trust me. 
quote: Do you think your backs practise together with your forwards? Do they rehearse plays? |
The sad thing is I think they do. A fresh set of eyes on the training field couldn’t hurt therefore.
quote: I never get that impression with England. |
That’s why watching them is such an immersive experience. You can never ever relax with them. 
quote: I suspect some of it might be a hangover from the Lions tour. |
There’s some of that for sure, but most of that should have been worked out last November. I’m the only one still carrying baggage from that. 
Mind you England-Australia is an edgy fixture whatever the sport.
quote: Give the babies a chance to show what they've got. |
It can’t hurt. Your big worry, as I think Tamerlin was concerned about, is that Italian discipline is appalling. Your youngsters might get hurt and that you do not need.
Clive has picked Christophers to replace Simpson-Daniel (who has glandular fever!). That is a choice for the future – the conservative option would have been Robinson or Healey to the wing.
quote: With that young Springbok now at the Brumbies, I suspect Pat Howard's days are numbered |
Could you have a word with him for me? Encourage him to come back? 
quote: Fair enough, Freier had to come on to replace Jeremy Paul, but why did his appearance have to coincide with so many lineouts? |
Beats me, but it was intentional clearly given they were pretty much all Wallaby calls to do so.
The Giteau thing was bizarre – no time to play in and a real pressure cooker situation. Eddie clearly likes to blood ‘em big time?
quote: When would that have been? Around 15 years ago? I must look up which - if any - of the Wallabies he played against. |
Should be 1990, maybe late 89.
And oh yes he is certainly playing L***** - the flat cap gives it away. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Andydog
Well, I happen to agree with Finbar on this. |
I always suspected you were a chap of taste, judgement and wisdom. I have been proved right. For the moment. 
quote: If the NZ decoys don't obstruct then no rules are broken. |
That's the whole point. Which leads to the question - on what basis would they outlaw decoy runners if they try to? What will they call illegal? If they decide that a decoy runner causing obstruction is illegal - the obstruction law already exists! If they decide that you can't pass a ball behind a team mate's back - they're potentially outlawing a cutout pass. As I've said before, let the IRB worry about more pressing - and real, not imagined - problems.
quote: I'll agree that the use of this tactic adds another small dimension to the game, and that perhaps people who prefer rucks and mauls wouldn't like this dimension... |

quote: Did anyone see the SA Scotland game? The saffees looked like a rabble. |
I saw bits of it. The Boks were very scrappy. The coach is now into making wholesale changes to the team at every opportunity which is far from a good sign.
quote: Is the betting compo still going, and if so, what would the margin be between England and SA? I would pick England by 15. |
The betting comp is still alive, we just have to get our acts together in time.
quote: I suspect that the English forwards will start communicating with their backs in this game. |
By letter, presumably.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Mad Monk
Please, have mercy on a poor, ignorant American...
What the hell is L***** and S*****? |
Just for you, Monk, in the interests of your education and ongoing friendly international reasons, I'll use the words in this thread. Any other use is strictly forbidden!
L***** refers to a game called Rugby League, a bastard offspring of Rugby Union, the game to which our threads are dedicated. The games have different rules - L***** has fewer rules because those who play it lack the intelligence to learn any more - and there are fewer players (13) in L***** than there are in Union (15) because people who play L***** are generally considered unable to count beyond 13. Dedicated contributors to this thread have been known to dance naked around burning bushes at midnight praying to The Great Game God that He or She might smite L***** from the planet.
S***** is Soccer. We dance clothed - except for Tamerlin, he hates S***** with an utter passiom, so he dances naked - around burning bushes at midnight praying to The Great Game God that He or She causes all S***** balls - en masse - to spring a permanent leak.
That's about it, really. Pure, unmitigated, rabid intolerance. 
Last edited by finbar on 20-11-2002 at 13:07
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Journeyman
|
|
Sydney
Aug 2002 time: 15:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Mad Monk
What the hell is L***** and S*****? |
He's talking about Rugby League, the working man's footy. Union has always been a sport for the elite class, the Wallabies pick up players from GPS Christian schools attended to only by the upper-middle/rich class of society and the only way to watch Super12 live is to get cable!
League is a sport open to anyone with SKILL, not MONEY and has plenty of free to air coverage. It is less complex for sure, but because of it is a smoother game than Union which stops again and again because of all the regulations. League is more creative because you can rely on having the ball for a set time and create a strategy and have a space between the opposing sides to devise brilliant set pieces.
Union is a great international sport but any rubbishing of League by some individuals is from pure arrogance. It may be in a slump through its management but it's a well loved game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Journeyman
|
|
Sydney
Aug 2002 time: 15:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by finbar
L***** refers to a game called Rugby League, a bastard offspring of Rugby Union, the game to which our threads are dedicated.
|
And rugby union is a bastard offspring of Soccer, it began when someone picked up a soccer ball and ran with it.
quote: Originally posted by finbar
The games have different rules - L***** has fewer rules because those who play it lack the intelligence to learn any more
|
Games don't have to be complicated, why should sport have so many rules? It seems you love being restricted by regulations, they reduce creativity.
quote: Originally posted by finbar
- and there are fewer players (13) in L***** than there are in Union (15) because people who play L***** are generally considered unable to count beyond 13.
|
Tell that to tactical geniuses like Lockyer, Fittler and Joey Johns. As for less players, League is a working mans sport and the working man is fit, they don't need so many to cover the field.
quote: Originally posted by finbar
Dedicated contributors to this thread have been known to dance naked around burning bushes at midnight praying to The Great Game God that He or She might smite L***** from the planet.
|
No comment. Just who are you making fun of?
Last edited by Journeyman on 20-11-2002 at 13:20
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ravagon
|
|
Australia
Sep 1999 time: 13:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Journeyman
And rugby union is a bastard offspring of Soccer, it began when someone picked up a soccer ball and ran with it.
|
Its not worth arguing over a games obscure origins. In keeping with the threads current title - golf, one of the most dreary and excruciatingly tedious games ever thought up came about when a halfling named Bullroarer, IIRC, knocked a goblins head off and sent it down a rabbit hole several hundred feet away. How something so entertaining could have sunk so far is beyond me ... 
quote:
Games don't have to be complicated, why should sport have so many rules? It seems you love being restricted by regulations, they reduce creativity.
|
Heh heh. Reduced Creativity? Doesn't L***** come to a complete standstill after basically every tackle? This tackle-stop cycle to be followed by the inevitable kick up field on the last or second-to-last before the handover?
quote:
Tell that to tactical geniuses like Lockyer, Fittler and Joey Johns. As for less players, L***** is a working mans sport and the working man is fit, they don't need so many to cover the field.
|
We're really going to have to talk to somebody about that auto-censor. Those names should have been bleeped to L******, F****** and J*** J****.
quote: No comment. Just who are you making fun of?
|
I wouldn't want to speak for finbar but I'd hazard a guess at an answer something along the lines of "anybody and everybody" 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|