 |
|  |
 |
|
woody
|
|
Well, I've become rather disenchanted with Firaxis, because of the way they've continually released horrible games and patches.
I am a big supporter of Civ3 1.29f, and think the game is very well-designed and relatively bug-free, and definitely worth the money. But the process getting there was long and frustrating, and now they're doing it all over again with PtW!
Has Firaxis not learned a single thing?
I was always a big supporter of Civ3, and fought against the "whiners" that complained about things like spearmen beating tanks, which is clearly part of the game. But, I'm afraid, I can't stick up for the way Firaxis has released these bug-ridden games and patches.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
woody
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tiberius
I don't like buggy games, either. But tell me: would you have prefered to have a 1.29 civ released in october 2002 instead of those 9 months of playing?
|
I'd have preferred to wait until at least Feb. 2002, which is when they released the first patch. The game was playable after that, although still very buggy.
Okay, so I've learned my lesson. I will never again pre-order a Firaxis game, nor buy it until it's been out several months and the bugs are fixed. Of course, by then, I may not bother picking it up at all.
Is that really the message that Firaxis wants to give to its customers?
It's also difficult to tell how unplayable a game is by just reading comments. You tend to get extremes, from whiners who complain about everything because they suck at the game, to fan-boys who would praise a smelly bowel movement from Sid. So, in the future, I'll lean on the side of caution before buying any Firaxis game, even if it gets good reviews.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
Civ3 v1.29f is a fantastic game. But, getting there left me with too many doubts about the competence of Firaxis staff.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Chronus
|
|
quote: Until I see a Firaxian own up to that, I will keep in mind that it came through (from?) Infogrames. |
The quote was from Infogrames . . . it's on the opening news board.
Who made the quote wasn't my point or concern . . . I just thought the statement was a comical example of absurd irony.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Coracle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by FrustratedPoet
I hold the opposite viewpoint.
They owe us absolutely nothing. If we don't like their games we don't buy them. If you bought Civ3 or PTW and don't like it then return it to the shop for a refund. That is your right as a consumer.
Nobody is forcing us to play Civ3 and nobody is forcing Firaxis or Infogrames to keep funding the development team.
|
That is the old "Pay - and keep your mouth shut" argument. It is totally specious.
We are not walking into an electronics store and buying a new CD player. We have been discussing the Civ games on forums for many years, and user creation and modding has kept the Civ franchise going for a long time.
Beyond that, forums are the ONLY place where we can get accurate and true reviews and comments on a game. We surely can NOT in gaming world Industry reviews which acted as Firaxis shills almost a year ago.
Considering how user effort, discussion, and interest has kept the Civ franchise going, Firaxis owes us a lot more than "if you don't like it don't buy it" nonsense. Same with just giving us a refund. Many people do not want a refund - THEY WANT A GOOD GAME.
After Civ 3, and all its inadequate patches, I knew what a mess PTW was going to be, and I was right. So they did not get my money on that. Seeing the forums and what a mess it is I am not surprised knowing Firaxis.
Firaxis owes us all the courtesy and consideration of doing more than giving us a refund. I will do more than just refuse to buy Firaxis products in the future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
woody
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Wittlich
I concur with your analysis centrifuge. I too believe that Firaxis will not follow in the same foot steps as Activision. |
I wouldn't be to sure about that. Infogrames appears to have 1.5 feet in the grave. Check out finance.yahoo.com and read the horror stories about their financial woes. If/when they go belly-up, Firaxis's money stream will be cut off (Infogrames or the bankrupcy holdings will get the revenue from Civ3 sales). Firaxis is not going to work on patches for free.
I think it's foolish to buy PtW with the hope that it will eventually be patched to an acceptable quality. Wait a few months, and pick it up if it ever gets fixed properly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
I would second Marione's opinions pretty much across the board.
The PTW release seems like the low point for this company and I am glad they finally have decided to look PR up in the dictionary.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by woody
But, if they want to salvage any kind of reputation at all, they do owe customers an apology and a reversal of their dismal release and patch performance.
|
Dismal patch performance? How many patches do you want them to release? Do you want buggy patches released NOW?
How old are you Woody? Is it necessary to start every comment with a shot at the people who enjoy the game?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DilithiumDad
|
|
The single-player changes are nice, especially how they combine to relieve the tedium that formerly characterized the late Industrial Age. However, I still feel ripped off as multiplayer was the reason I bought PTW. I am currently playing a game as the Koreans in the Modern Age and have not gotten my Golden Age yet despite many battles with my special unit and completion of many Scientific Great Wonders. I hope this gets fixed!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
redgabber
|
|
I think the new patch will be include with the european version ... that's good.
there is delay, it is perhaps because of that
|
|
|  |
 |
|
woody
|
|
quote: Originally posted by asleepathewheel
Dismal patch performance? How many patches do you want them to release? Do you want buggy patches released NOW?
|
By dismal performance, I'm referring to a horrible initial release, 2 lousy patches that broke as many things as they fixed, and a full 9 months until they finally released a good version. If the game wasn't ready to be released (and it clearly wasn't), they should have waited until it was ready.
quote:
How old are you Woody? Is it necessary to start every comment with a shot at the people who enjoy the game? |
What shot? I happen to very much enjoy Civ 1.29f. It's a very good game. Perhaps you should take off your fanboy glasses and see that not everyone who criticizes Firaxis hates Civ. (That was a shot, but clearly you deserve the favor in return.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|