 |
|  |
 |
|
player1
|
 |
Belgrade, YU
Sep 2001 time: 06:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
Then the answer would be no. Not out of the box.
Yes...with patching, but that's not the same thing.
Different question.
-=Vel=- |
So we agreed.
MP was no good enough with 1.01f & 1.04f
1.14f patch came just 3 weeks after relase and fixed most of problems.
So there is realy nothing more to discuss.
Since all people who haven't bought the game unit now, will get "promised experince" (in most cases), since they will get the patches (even a casual gamers, since that MP, and word spreads quickly).
P.S.
Nothing new in gaming industry.
P.P.S.
Has this turned to flame war, just beacuse some think that 1.04f MP was "broken", while other think that it's just "not perfect"?
That's pretty much subjective thing, so I guess we shall stop discussiong about has game out of box had "broken" or "non-perfect" MP.
It's not important anyway, since NOBODY is playing out-of-box MP if there IS patch to download.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BottleOfPills
|
|
This is in response to "ItsNotYou"s post several spots up.
Criticizing Vel and a statement about PTW working out of the box, working for some people?
It'sNotYou - Name One Single Person On this Planet that Played One average Multiplayer Game through to completion with the product out of the box. Name one?
You can't. It didn't allow for it didn't work nada. As far as I'm concerned it still doesn't. My system requirements says something about a 28.8 modem. I have yet to read a post from anyone playing a successful game with anything other than broadband. How come "Broadband" isn't in the requirements for the game?
I'm with Vel and most of his points seem solid to me. The game should be playable out of the box. This game was marketed as "multiplayer", hell the title even suggests it. "PLAY THE WORLD".
This was a scam put on the civ fans as far as I'm concerned. Thankfully they've fixed it for the broadband people.
I'm Out like my hairline.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:23
|
|
NYE....I agree with you.
"companies do not patch working products."
was your phrasing, and
It is not, I don't believe, standard policy to patch a piece of software if there are no problems *with* that software.
was mine.
Both make the same point.
Where we differ in opinion is this:
I contend that the implication inherent IN those statements is as follows:
a) companies do not patch working products
so
b) if a company patches, then something must not be working
which means, in my mind that
c) Given that there are and have been patches for both PTW and Civ3 (and more than once at that), this leads me to the conclusion that the products were not working as described
But...this apparently is a sore subject, and to even bring it up seems to invite flames, so yes....I will happily simply agree to disagree on the point.
On a completely unrelated note though, I have noticed that since I began working on Candle'Bre, my opinions on the quality and completeness of games has changed remarkably.
This is the standard that *I expect* to be held to for Candle'Bre.
I WANT YOU to hold my feet to the fire if what I describe is not what you get.
And on another unrelated note....this is gonna sound really odd, but....since I've been working on CB (and playing an active role in creating all the models for the game), I find myself creating models for....pretty much everything.
Last night, after making my last post, and before drifting off to sleep, I created a "degrees of brokenness" model, which looks something like this (for quantifying "how broke is broke."):
(Weight of Feature Importance in a given release) * (estimated # users impacted by non-functional or damaged feature/total user base)
Such that, say...if Coastal Fortresses aren't working right, but the main thrust of the patch or expansion is MP, then it might carry a weight of 0.02, but other features (MP for example), might be weighted as high as 0.75, which would provide at least a guide for the relative importance of stuff, and for prioritization.
-=Vel=-
PS: Candle'Bre enhancement packs will be free, btw. Fate card expansions, scenario packs....stuff like that....free. Patches issued to expand the functionality of the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SpencerH
|
 |
Co-Ruler of my patch of land south of Birmingham Alabama
Feb 2002 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by WarpStorm
Well, when I had to get a patch for civ2 (crashed out of box), Microprose sent me a disk with it on it. I'm sure that Infogrames would do the same. |
That may work for one patch, but there were 4 patches for Civ3.
quote: Originally posted by player 1
Good point for Civ3, but NOT good point for PtW.
Since if somebody wants to play Internet MP he NEEDS Internet access. |
Thats true
quote: And only MP was "not perfect"/"broken" (choose your word),
with original PtW. |
But its clearly advertised as MP and thats what most people bought it for. AFAIK, even with the patch it's really only for MP for broadband users. If that was a requirement for MP it should have said so. Some people would have been annoyed, but at least they would have known what they were buying.
Look at the minimum hardware specs for CIV3.
IBM PC or 100% compatible computer
Pentium II-300 MHz or faster processor
Windows 95, 98, ME, 2000, or XP
32 MB RAM
500 MB available hard drive space
4X or faster CD-ROM drive
SVGA video card (capable of 1024x768x16-bit color) *
Windows 95 or 98 compatible sound card*
Is there anyone who thinks this game could really be played and enjoyed with a machine like this?
What this really seems to be is a question of 'truth in advertising'.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
player1
|
 |
Belgrade, YU
Sep 2001 time: 06:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
Hmmm.....forgive me for saying so, Player1, but the situation you just described does not sound like it's "plays perfectly well" to me.
Rather, it sounds like it plays.....contingent on disabling game features (no music, no more than 8 players, standard maps only).
-=Vel=- |
It does say that it's MINIMAL needed conf. NOT the optimal one.
You are SUPPOSED to have better conf. in order to get OPTIMAL preformance.
Now, I could play at huge maps with more players, and it WOULD work, but it would be way to SLOW.
And if they have just written higher minimal conf. that would be simple unture, and I would have not have Civ3, which I am playing now (and ejoying).
MINIMAL is suppsed to be playable and NOT optimal.
And it plays almost optimal to me if I take out music and play smaller maps.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Coracle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by FNBrown
I agree with Vel... PTW was a flawed product at shipment, and the greatest selling point was also the most glaring deficiency.
That said, I think the horse is dead, gentlemen. Let's stop beating the old nag and let it rot in peace, shall we? |
What I WANT is a game that is a worthy succesor to Civ 2. Even after five patches (more to come?) for Civ 3 and PTW combined, we do not have it.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|