 |
|  |
 |
|
alexman
|
 |
Hunt Valley, MD
Jan 1970 time: 00:23
|
|
Well, I did a simple test, and the answer is 0.5% per tuen chance of disease for every floodplains tile a city is working.
I think that's good news. Before getting two settlers out, the plan is to work flood plains for about 10 turns with the city larger than size 1. That means that we have about a 5% chance of getting hit before we have 3 cities. Not bad odds.
Last edited by alexman on 15-12-2002 at 21:26
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Thanks for the info alexman. From experience, I was sure the figure was under 2%. If we are alone, we'll be glad to have Flood Plains, because your REX phase will be awesome (I'm secretly hoping for a Flood Plain with Wheat just North of our capital...oh yeah, that would nice).
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
alexman
|
 |
Hunt Valley, MD
Jan 1970 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nbarclay
Would you mind describing more about the methodology behind your test?
|
Not at all:
1) Create map with nothing but floodplains.
2) Place 100 cities of size 2 on the map, and change their center tile and another of their tiles to bonus grassland. (Each city is working a bonus grassland and a floodplains tile).
3) Play the first turn of many games (64 in my case).
4) Record the total number of cities that were affected by disease in all tests.
5) Divide the total number of disease instances by the total number of tests to get the answer in percent.
Edit: When you change the non-center grassland tiles to flood plains, the cities are working two flood plains tiles instead of one, and you get twice as many disease occurances.
Last edited by alexman on 15-12-2002 at 21:25
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|