 |
|
Valuk
|
|
Acres Wild
Oct 2002
time: 05:23
|
|
Is there no one left who wants to play?
Come on!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
greeny
|
|
The Kremlin
Jan 2001
time: 05:23
|
|
I'm up for a PBEM: Age of War perhaps?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Choke
|
|
Anzac, on some tiles there is industry, it looks the same as the roads but it simulates the superior industrial might of the more advanced powers, Germany and Britain have lots, France less, Italy less, Spain has I think 1 tile with it and the rest have none. Also I tried to make sure it isn't useful to transport troops, it's just there for production and can be pillaged.
I took away a lot of roads from the poorer countries to simulate their poorness and to make it harder for them to move, they need to spend time making roads before they can move troops easily. Also I increased the road movement to 8 so that troops can be moved quickly, just not infinitely and also so that you CAN move a few spaces and attack but like real life if troops march for weeks then attack they won't be at the height of readyness or enthuseasm.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Choke
|
|
oh, well yeah you could say that, they are around the rich country's cities.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
0hwell
|
|
I think that makes the weaker countries too tedious to play.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Choke
|
|
No, they can do stuff, it's not that they have NO roads, just less of them, like they aren't on every tile and they sort of twist around so it takes longer to get places, there's also rivers which are important especially in Russia. Only Turkey would be tedious, the other countries are similar to usual.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
JamesJKirk
|
 |
Dixon, CA USA
Jan 1970
time: 21:23
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by The ANZAC
Well, it's John C. Calhoun as my avatar, so the US 
I have my own blog spot too: http://theanzac.blogspot.com
Hopefully this is just a phase  |
I once had a political theory professor who was fascinated by Calhoun, which is kind of surprising, since the guy seemed reasonably left-wing (I know, what a shocker for a prof).
Libertarianism is so interesting, just because of all the ideologies it can hold, and how it in no way can fit on the standard political spectrum. I consider myself sort of moderate-left libertarian, but I'm not a member of the party because it seems to be run by conspiracy theorist gun-nuts. (No offense to conspiracy theorist gun-nuts, I just don't feel like voting for them).
Back sort of OT: I was actually hoping for a Crises of NWO game, but I joined one at CFC and don't have time for another.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Choke
|
|
Libertarianism: The most useless ideas of the right and left with no good policies from either combined to make one worthless steaming pile of shite.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JamesJKirk
|
|
Dixon, CA USA
Jan 1970
time: 21:23
|
|
I actually agree w/ you guys on most of that, well not really w/ Choke, but the smaller, less intrusive govt parts, and the individual freedom parts appeal to me, but like I said, other parts turn me off. In my congressional district this year, there was just a Democrat and a Libertarian running, so I thought that was kind of cool, but I looked at the voter pamphlet and her platform was to abolish the IRS and withdraw the US from the UN...and to think that she didn't win
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Choke
|
|
I've never heard of Calhoun, I just know that less involved governments are less effective. Libertarianism lacks moral fibre as well as economic sense.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23.
Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
23-11-2002 17:40
|