 |
What would you like to build first?
This poll is closed. |
| Warrior (1/1/1/1) |
   |
9 |
81.82% |
| Spearman (1/2/1/2) |
   |
2 |
18.18% |
| Other (Barracks?) |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Abstain/Banana |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
11 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
CiverDan
|
|
Keep the second warrior to guard the city. We don't need to do that with the first one since there is no real chance of having someone close enough to city to reach it before the second warrior is built. Going out with the second warrior is more chancy for that reason and potentionally due to barbs also. This is why we must always defend our settlers also.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
WarriorPoet
|
|
No granary, I want scouts (warriors), and settlers, period. Granaries are a waste of time to research and to build, until you've built a few settlers already.
Also, explore with your warriors, no garrison until you get spearmen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CiverDan
|
|
I generally build warrior to settler build, then spear. I will then explore with my first warrior. I just dislike leaving cities undefended in MP especially the capital, too many bad things can happen given the unpredictability of human players.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
WarriorPoet
|
|
That means we don't really need to worry about the AI...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CiverDan
|
|
There is one AI, the spanish. As far as granaries go, I am in favor of one granary in the capital, after our first settler is built, but no more.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
WarriorPoet
|
|
The roleplay team is using the Spanish Civ.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CiverDan
|
|
ok...now I get it
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|