 |
When should we switch to a Free Market Economy?
This poll is closed. |
| Now |
   |
6 |
33.33% |
| As soon as possible (Please specify under what conditions in a post) |
   |
3 |
16.67% |
| Eventually (Please specify under what conditions in a post) |
   |
2 |
11.11% |
| Never |
   |
7 |
38.89% |
| Write-in |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Xenobanana |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
18 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Main_Brain
|
|
Economic World Center
Jul 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
Yeeeeehaw! :=)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kirov
|
|
Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
OK, got the point. What I wanted to point out is that in RP discussion one should not use such arguments as: 'Hey, look! With FM we'll make the next breakthru in 10 turns!'...
Voted 'never' to FM.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GeneralTacticus
|
 |
of Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2001 time: 15:24
|
|
quote: I think you have to decide which is more important, +2 Econ or avoiding the mistakes of old Earth. |
These 'mistakes' being what? The 'mistakes' made on Earth were:
1) To allow oligarchies too much power in the West and elsewhere,
2) To allow the proliferation of weapons to an insane extent,
3) To interpret 'we don't need to worship the enironment' as 'let's destroy the environment'.
FM didn't cause any of these mistakes, it simply helped to magnify them (it should be noted that in the USSR, the environment was left in a far worse state than in the US, despite it's use of a Planned economy. The oligarchy also had far morw power there).
quote: Edit: Besides, IMO pop-boom (from Planned, and building Children's Creches) is more important ATM than +2 Econ. |
If we were going to Pop-boom, we should have done it already. we don't have nearly enough CC's to make it worthwhile, or enough Rec Commons, for that matter.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GeneralTacticus
These 'mistakes' being what? The 'mistakes' made on Earth were:
1) To allow oligarchies too much power in the West and elsewhere,
2) To allow the proliferation of weapons to an insane extent,
3) To interpret 'we don't need to worship the enironment' as 'let's destroy the environment'. |
To have a system whereby the Earths resources are used up at an unsustainable rate (eg. fossil fuels), to allow greed to push need out the window, to have half the worlds wealth in tha hands of less than 5% of the population, to produce enough food to feed the world, yet let many in the 3rd world starve, or die of diseases that we have cheap medication for, to allow companies, or even governments, to sell weapons to known violent regimes (as went on well into the 21st Century) and to create havok with the fragile eco-system.
quote: Originally posted by GeneralTacticus
FM didn't cause any of these mistakes, it simply helped to magnify them (it should be noted that in the USSR, the environment was left in a far worse state than in the US, despite it's use of a Planned economy. The oligarchy also had far morw power there). |
Can I have some evidence for this? The USSR by all accounts I'm aware of emited less pollutants than the USA per capita over 20th Century (or any period within the 20th Century IIRC)
Last edited by Drogue on 10-12-2002 at 17:01
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Earwicker
|
 |
Washington, DC, USA
Mar 1999 time: 00:24
|
|
ASAP, contingent upon Env Econ (to make the +2 energy worthwhile), trance defenders, and enough empath worm-hunters to keep things safe.
The extra energy will enable quicker new discoveries and funds to amass our army against the Hive (as Demo/ FM/ Knowledge so no -2 morale). Two very reasonable priorities. The police problems can be managed with psych and the ecodamage situation needs to be settled whatever our economics. When the time comes to launch the attack against the Hive, then we need to go Green or back to planned.
I was very surprised that the ED formula quoted above didn't have a factor for Planet rating. That's different from what I remember and had expected. It is counterintuitive that the relationship of mineral count to ecodamage would be independent of planet rating.
Whatever our economic system (and hence, whatever our planet rating), monitoring of mineral production and ecodamage/ pop levels will be important. Ultimately, our industrial needs will suggest setting mineral levels as high as possible with either zero or low ecodamage. It's just that under Green, we'll be able to push that level somewhat higher. Then end results will be the same - some ecodamage and occasional pops.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|