 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Does anyone else but me find it ironic, when Republicans are based like this, that Abe Lincoln himself was Republican?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by cyclotron7
The parties have completely changed since then... in both beliefs and constituency. What makes you think that what was true then is true now? That "Party of Lincoln" phrase is only a catchy anchronism. |
I am aware of that Seven. That's what I find ironic.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Promethus
JT
What?
Is this song not true to history both current abd past? |
Promethus, come on now. Most of what is in those lyrics can be easily applied to most states. It is a distortion of truth for a political purpose. Spare us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
It's not pandering to his constituency. It's blatant demagoguery. There is quite a difference.
I think its a shame that dueling has been outlawed. I think when people make statements like Gore did about Lott there should be an option to settle it honorably.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Also ironic is that America's greatest demogogue was also a Republican, McCarthy, Joseph R.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:24
|
|
quote: quote: quote:
Originally posted by Ned
I wish we could put issue behind us. Obviously, there are some Southerners who do not know they lost. |
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Yep, y'all got that pervasive, in-everybody's pants Federal government we all wanted and we just know the Framers intended.  |
A Senate majority leader from Mississippi is in trouble for saluting the outgoing President Pro Tem of the Senate, a South Carolinian. A president from Texas just replaced a president from Arkansas by defeating a former vice-president from Tennessee. While the Speaker of the House is from Illinois, that's only because the old speaker, from Georgia, screwed up so badly he had to resign, and then his replacement, from Louisiana, had to fess up to being adulterous. Meanwhile the government is controlled by the party that thinks taxes and homosexuals are just about equally evil, and that would like to return prayer to public schools -- all this in a country where forms of evangelical Protestantism are the fastest-growing religions.
Um, who won again?
I just wish they'd won back in 1865, and had their own little third-world backwater to govern instead of messing with my country. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:24
|
|
Byrd may have been a KKK member, and both Wallace and Thurdmond ran on pro-segregation plankc's, but all of the have also stated they were wrong and have changed their views. Lott seem to be the only braniac to actually still commonly get himself into trouble voicing pro-segregation views...
Krugman today in the NYTimes wrote an interesting article about the South; I don't agree wih most of it, but I do wonder at one basic point: Why do the states that gain the most out of Federalism in terms of services and development aid (The South, the West, those states either too poor or with population's too small to matter) always vote agains the idea of Federalism while those states that loose (California, the Northeast, those huge or rich states) by sending more money out as federal taxes than they will ever recoup always vote for it? If some hick from Mississippi doesn't care for income taxes, then why should I send him mine to pay for his subsidies and roads? Hell, if NY state and NJ stopped paying their federal taxes and kept all the money they export to Mississippi or Alabama, or Arkansas or Nebraska, Montana, or S. Dakota then our defecits would be far lower. It must be somehting in the water.....
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|