 |
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
Game breaking means that, when one player get's access to a unit first (either by tech lead or by having numbers of predeccessing troops to upgrade easily)
Horseman : First unit with the ability to retreat with a good attack value. A ancient era Horseman rush can be very powerful indeed.
Swordsman : These guys, while not upgradable , have an attack of 3, which is quite powerful, and a good defence. No other Unit (available to all civ's) can live up to a combined attack/defense value of 5
Knights : An attack of 4, with a defense of 3 says it all. If you get these first, you'll probably be still be fighting spearmen, and the odd pikemen. Like Horsemen, a good rush of these is very powerful.
Cavalry : These come with attack 6, defense 3 and a scary movement of 3. Bliztkrieg with guys is easy. The best defenders you're initally likely to come against , are musketmen with 4 def, if not pikemen/spearmen, who Cav will cut to bits. 3 movement means they can retreat from Any opponent, and Leader Generation is quite possible. This one is my chosen choice. And 'Stop the cavalry' has just stated playing... what a coincidence 
Infantry : An defence of 10, coupled with the same attack as Cav means quite a unit. Struggling in a war? Draft a few dozen of these guys and you'll be unbreakable. No-one will be able to even touch you until Tanks. Thier attacking potential, with a movement of one is questionable though, but as they say, Attack starts with the Defense!.
Tanks : The Ability to blizt, coupled with a monsterous attack value of 16 will allow you to streamroll your opponents into submission. A movement of 2 is not great but the ability to attack twice a turn really is big.
Modern Armor : These are the absolute daddy. Coming a great price you have the unit of all units. Blitzcreig can be done by even the poorest strategist using MA. Indeed, a poorly defended AI city can be taken by just one of these guys. Perhaps the scariest thing about these monsters is the price, meaning they can really be produced on mass.
Tactical Nuke's : The Nuke is deadly powerful, and with just one nuke you can take out the Enemy's capital putting absolute chaos into your opponents empire. For several turns they will not have widespread access to Luxuries or Strategic resources. If the campaign is planned carefully, you can cripple thier resource network Forever. A big weakness however is the distance/range may not be enough to reach your target.,they are not very usually useful in standard warfare, as pollution and terrain damage make your would-be cities useless.
ICBM's : The Same advantages as above but combine infanite range. Any target anyway is reachable instantly. With these boyz you can indefinatly isolate the AI Capital. They dont come cheap though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
None of the above. The only "game breaking" unit that I have ever come across, and I say this because they have kicked my butt on more than one occasion, are the Japanese Samurai 4-4-2. These units are terrifying if you don't have a proper defense set up.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
I meant to say, this is NOT including Unique unit's, but units everyone can build.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
quote: Originally posted by cyclotron7
I'm pretty sure everything is terrifying without the proper defense, MosesPresley. |
The reason I said that was because the Samurai usually come early enough in the game, ie new city expansion is starting to end and there are plenty of border cities that have only a couple or less of spearmen in them. These border cities may also not be connected to the roads yet. I can usually defend them from knights, because I can kill the knights due to their 3 defense. The 4 defense of the Samurai make them tough to stop.
I don't consider them to be game breakers. They just often break my strategy. Most of the UU's are fairly powerful.
Last edited by MosesPresley on 11-12-2002 at 22:43
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
Jaybe, I almost included Artillary, i have always liked it's power. and as for the 12*2 and 8*3 thing, it's an example of inbalance on the bomber side, Why have a rate of fire of 3 when the bombard is barely adequete to take a hitpoint. I like the bomber for the range tho.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sabrewolf

|
 |
turicum, helvetistan
Jun 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
my favority is also the cavalry.
as UU i actually prefer the rider (4,3,3) instead of the samurai (4,4,2) because in imho that extra movement is more worth in an agressive blitzkrieg than that extra defense:
- move front, attach, retreat
- move onto hills (+50% defense) and attack from there in the same turn
- retreat from defending knights/samurais
artillery is great for cracking strong defence but
a) too slow (move OR bombard)
b) small range
c) too many misses
d) too often destruction of things you might want to keep (granary, courthouses, etc.) before you destroy the things you actually want to destroy (barracks, walls, units)
i mostly use arty in the first attack wave (bordering cities). from then on fast forward. i'll lose more units but at least i don't need to worry about war weariness if i've conquered the enemy in 5 turns...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Cavalry : These come with attack 6, defense 3 and a scary movement of 3. Bliztkrieg with guys is easy. The best defenders you're initally likely to come against , are musketmen with 4 def, if not pikemen/spearmen, who Cav will cut to bits. 3 movement means they can retreat from Any opponent, and Leader Generation is quite possible. This one is my chosen choice. And 'Stop the cavalry' has just stated playing... what a coincidence |
A minor quibble: Cavalry's 3 moves do NOT allow them to retreat from other mobile units. This is a myth. Riders, Cavalry, Cossacks and Modern Armor (the only 3 move land units in the game) will not retreat from 2 move units. The game code simply says that one mobile unit prevents another from retreating.
One of the most vicious wars I ever fought (a long time ago) was as Babylon vs. Japan. The game was on Regent, and my civ was small but strong. Japan was sprawling and had recently squashed China like a bug. Anyway, they had a lot of Samurai and I was building Cav as fast as I could. They attacked me, and what ensued was a bloodbath. I won, totally, but it hurt. If the AI had any concept of how to use the unit properly, it could probably have held me off, at least on one front. There was a mountain range which my Cav crossed virtually unopposed, emerging at the gates of Kyoto. Imagine if they had simply lined it with Samurai. *shudder*
Otherwise I agree with you that Cavalry are the closest thing to a "gamebreaking" unit - provided you unleash a decent number of them pre-nationalism. You can fight Cav vs. Riflemen just fine, but they aren't nearly as devastating as when they are pitted against musketmen or weaker units.
For real amusement, try Sipahi. I cut loose with 50 of them and destroyed a 21-city Egypt (musketmen equipped, most cities above size 6, some on hills) in 7 turns, losing roughly 5-10 Sipahi. 8 attack, 3 move is truly devastating.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Worthingtons
|
|
Pride Park,Derby
Jan 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
Like you I have a story with the Cav in my current game. When Germany invaded, i was completely unprepared, and for about the first time in my Civ III time, got absolutly sloughtered by thier cruisade of Knights. I almost quit the game infact. Luckily tho, i had just struck a trade agreement (found another cont first!) with the other continent civs for over 500gpt!!(Middle ages still), So, my core cities flat out produced (and rushed ) Knights while beelining stright for Military Tradition. As soon as i got Cav and upgraded, i completly wiped the floor with them, removing thier presence from my cities, and burning half thier own . Was as simple as that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
I would say Cavalry.
quote:
one of the above. The only "game breaking" unit that I have ever come across, and I say this because they have kicked my butt on more than one occasion, are the Japanese Samurai 4-4-2.
|
The Japanese are a great civ:
Religious
Militaristic
UU of Samurai
They are deadly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Silpy
|
|
The USA's European Colony
Sep 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
It is all relitive. Any unit, as long it is not too old (ie Not Warrior V Rifleman) too far way (Going from India to South Africa by land) or too outnumbered (not 1:20), can really put up a fight if used well by a shrewd commander. Luckily, the AI rarely do. But I do long for a well planned invasion....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
King_Henry
|
|
Auburn Correctional Facility
Nov 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
I'm going to have to say knights. I recall a game where I wiped out a 15 city civ in twenty turns using 25 knights and a catapult. I'll build a ton of them in every game.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|