 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
We probably should have remade Japanese society while we were at it. They're still horribly racist. At least they aren't militarists anymore (for the most part--fascism is still trendy there). |
It's a wierd racism though. They seem to value Caucasian physiognomic traits above their own.
Can you name a society that isn't racist? They're still not letting the Turks into the EU are they? Well, at least they have their reasons.
Maybe what we need is a world Atonement Day. Let each nation remember those it screwed over.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: The world has changed. Racism is still rampant, but modern nations are far too dependent on each other, while weapons have become too lethal. Superpowers no longer feel the urge to attack each other |
You could've said the exact same thing before WWI. I appreciate your optimism, but I don't know if I share it. |
Yes, definitely, we could have said the same thing before WW1.
But countries don't wage war unless they're reasonably confident that they can win without attrition and with something to gain afterwards. (In other words, maximum returns with minimum cost.) Nukes make both of those impossible. This is precisely why India and Pakistan backed off very recently, why China still hasn't invaded US-backed Taiwan, and so on.
Besides, look at Europe today. Would France or Germany even bother to attack each other anymore? They're so economically tied that it's simply more profitable to trade than to fight. In 50 years, the same can very well be said about all superpowers - China, Russia, India, NATO. In that case, wars would be quick, localized affairs - Gulf Wars and Kosovo Wars. There would be no WW3.
(On the other hand.... I'm not factoring in the possibility of a madman. Some leaders don't listen to cooler-headed advisers...)
Last edited by ranskaldan on 15-12-2002 at 21:36
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
It's a wierd racism though. They seem to value Caucasian physiognomic traits above their own. |
A friend of mine spent a year in Japan as an English teacher. He is 6'5", half-white and half-lebanese, so he really stood out there. He tried to date Japanese, but they regarded him as a freak. One Japanese friend explained that for many, dating a non-Japanese person is seen as a fetish, almost like bestiality. He eventually found a white guy to date.
quote: Can you name a society that isn't racist? They're still not letting the Turks into the EU are they? Well, at least they have their reasons. |
While I wouldn't say there isn't racism in the EU, this isn't a good example. Turkey is not being excluded, as Europe will revist their application in 2004, and the reasons are not racial, but economic and political. Until Turkey makes some changes to their government, human rights and economic policies (like all EU countries had to), they can't be in the club.
Sure, there are probably Europeans who don't want them just because their Turks, but that's not an official reason.
quote: Maybe what we need is a world Atonement Day. Let each nation remember those it screwed over. |
National Brotherhood Week? 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Frankychan
|
 |
In the Kingdom of Hawaii (CPA Member)
Sep 2001 time: 19:24
|
|
*big sigh*
The Nanjing (Nanking, to some) was a horrible massacre that shouldn't have happened. Innocent lives were lost because of the atrocities that Japanese military men committed.
However, I should point out to you all that Japan, Germany, nor the Soviet Union are the only ones guilty of despicable acts like these.
For instance, the United States of America passed out blankets contaminated with smallpox by the hundreds (if not thousands) to Native American Indians. Not many people are doing anything about this now, AFAIK.
No one seems to be complaining about the genocidal war in Africa (i.e. Congo, Angola, Rwanda & Burundi, etc.) Millions of people there have been butchered as well but I haven't seen much press about these. Just because these atrocities are in Africa, should one simply ignore them?
On article I read (Time, Newsweek, or NY Times Magazine...cannot remember) covered a war for coltan in one of the African countries. Coltan is used by our cell-phone BTW. Anyway, literally hundreds of thousands are working in deplorable conditions just so we can have an extra feature on our cellphone.....but it seems no one is paying much attention to them.
Now, I'm not justifying the Nanjing massacre, heck I'm half-japanese and I find it rather sick and disgusting. But neither am I glad America (my nationality) dropped the A-Bombs on two populated cities. I don't think Japan deserved the A-Bombs as much as the people of Nanjing deserved to be brutally murdered.
Basically what I'm saying is that pretty much EVERY country in this world has done something despicable to get to where it is today......The U.S. included.
(sorry for the rambling post, just had to get my 2-cents in) 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
This isn't the place for a "who did the worst" pissing contest. |
Oh, but I love contests.
Me first.
My great, great, great great gandad was a slaveowning Quaker elder in Virginia in the 1830s. In that year the Quaker church finally demanded that its membership give up their slaveowning ways, with no exceptions. Good ol' great, great, great, great grandpa answered this summons by renouncing the Quaker church, then put his back to his congreagation by packing up his family and slaves and moving to Tennessee to take possession of a farm just vacated by a deported Cherokee family. Legend has it that the fireplaces were still warm. Another legend has it that the former owner avoided deportation by accepting a position as foremen on his own (former) farm. Great great great great grandad, recognizing a terrific package deal, agreed without hesitation. Spirit like that made this country great or what?! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Joseph
|
 |
Ca. USA
Feb 2000 time: 21:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Frankychan
*big sigh*
No one seems to be complaining about the genocidal war in Africa (i.e. Congo, Angola, Rwanda & Burundi, etc.) Millions of people there have been butchered as well but I haven't seen much press about these. Just because these atrocities are in Africa, should one simply ignore them?
| Think about what you are saying. Clinton is the first and only US President to visit Africa while in office. When is the last time a US Pres. visited S. America?
They go to Europe, China, Japan, S. Korea.
Has a US Pres. ever been to Aust., N. Z?
The Nazi killing were bad, however the way the Japanese kill, I think were far worse.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Frankychan
|
 |
In the Kingdom of Hawaii (CPA Member)
Sep 2001 time: 19:24
|
|
Urban,
You've just covered something that I didn't think about. Yeah, it's true that Japan hasn't, to my knowledge, admit to their military's atrocities in WWII. I would be extremely shocked if they did have the Nanjing massacre in their school's textbooks.
But it seems like people here think I'm supporting Japan's deplorable behavior....I'm not. I think my ancestor's who didn't stand up to these murderers are cowards. I don't think there's any honor in butchering whole villages "for sport". Neither do I think using people from Uchinanchu (Okinawa) as human shields is anywhere near justifiable.
What I was trying to accomplish was to have those other posters here who were making rather inappropriate comments realize that 1)Nanjing was disgusting and horrific and 2)THEIR own country (the posters in question) is probably just as guilty in some form of barbarism as well.
Joseph-I see your point. Although Clinton's visit to Africa was a step in the right direction, I personally believe our current administration has to step up the American people's information on everything that's happening there. Unfortunately, the US has its hands dirty in politics in Africa, which I don't think our administration wants to have the general public known (think P. Lumumba)
Boris and Drake- I also agree that BOTH Japan and Germany were sadists in how they carried out the plethora of atrocities. Although it seems that Japanese actions were barbaric and disorganized, I think in some area's it was localized. I've read that they rounded up prisoners for experiments just like the Nazi scientists did.
Japan wanted to be the leader of Asia with the other countries existing as second-class citizens whereas Germany wanted to just exterminate everyone and have a German-only society. (IMHO, of course)
Still though, the lot of 'em are a bunch of sadists.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guardian
|
 |
Bergen, Norway
Feb 2001 time: 06:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Joseph
The Nazi killing were bad, however the way the Japanese kill, I think were far worse. |
How can you say that?
The way I see it, if you're killing innocent people, then you're killing innocent people, and that's pretty much all there is to it. I mean, there really is no "better" or "worse" way to go about doing it. It's just wrong no matter what, where, when and how.
Hence, by my reckoning, the people who dropped the firebombs on the city of Dresden were in effect no better than those who put people on the trains to Auschwitz.
How is burning people in their homes "better" than sending them off to a camp and burning them there?
How is the indiscrimimate slaughter of an entire city "better" than sorting out certain groups and sending them off to "special treatment"?
I hear people say the nazi killings were worse because they were so cold, calculated and organized, but weren't the allied air operations calculated and organized as well?
Certainly something to think about, isn't it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Pioneer
|
 |
Germany
May 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
I am shocked at how you guys compare what's better and what's worse on such evil atrocities! Ask the victims on what is better or worse!
So long...
Last edited by The Pioneer on 16-12-2002 at 18:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|