 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by DinoDoc
What does that have to do with anything Tass? |
quote:
And more.......Ya gotta take them all out, or none of them. Its just that simple. |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fez
Let them collapse on themselves. |
China will help because they dont want their communist ally to collapse. Immigration, and sharing a border with South Korea isn't the best thing ever...
quote:
China may actually want the South to invade. The North has been causing problems. |
Again, there would be a flood of peopel going into China. China does not want this and is trying to preserve North Korea so it can keep its people to itself.
quote:
Nope my case is supported by the publication of a October 2002 Central Intelligence Agency Report. Highlighting what Iraq has and what Iraq didn't account for in the early 90s. Gee what happened to those 600 or so chemical weapon filled rockets?  Or something like that. I suggest you check it out. |
Wasn't it the CIA that also said something along the lines of "If you attack Iraq, chances of terrorism will incease"?
Hmm.....
quote:
Internal dissent. Same stuff Iran has been getting. Reformists are becoming a new force in Iran challanging the Mullahs. |
And china will surpress them using its very large military. You need to remember that internal dissent does not automatically equal a revolution. The chances of a "democratic" revolution in China are actually quite low.
Although I do hope I'm wrong, of course 
quote:
Well you are foolish. |
That's not a very logical arguement, Fez. "You are foolish" offers no proof of that arguement nor the one before it, and therefore I can't debate it until you begin using some logic.
quote:
You don't know a frigging thing you are talking about. Get a clue. |
Yet another illogical arguement. Why can't you just counter it using any form of logic at all? If I don't know what Im talking about and you do, then counter it.
quote:
Well North Korea can't go on spending 60% of its economy on the military. You keep ignoring that point. So it will collapse. China has been changing its way in the past thirty years pal. Open your eyes. |
So? Do you really think China will simply let its North Korean ally simply collapse because it has a bad economy and let millions of people cross the border INTO china?
Even if it wanted to theres still that problem of people just flooding that border.....
quote:
Yes there is proof. Iraq submitted a bullshit weapons report. |
And how is it "bullshit"? Because you don't like it?
quote:
How the heck can a group of what... 100 or 200 people cover a nation like Iraq? |
Have you ever heard "innocent until proven guilty"? I will admit that it does seem quite impropable they'll catch EVERYTHING in their small little probe, but until the United States can actually offer EVIDENCE that Iraq possess these weapons.....
quote:
How about all the chemical, biological and nuclear weapons Iraq hasn't accounted for last time? What happened to those? |
I dunno....They could've sold them, hidden them, they couldv'e been destroyed by Saddam or by the United States....
However again, thats not evidence of a thing other than they're missing. Iraq may not even have them. Who knows.....they could've given them to Pakistan who gave them to NORTH KOREA!   
But again that does not mean their guilt. Innocent until proven guilty....
What hasn't it done?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Giancarlo
|
 |
Los Angeles
Apr 2000
time: 02:24
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tassadar5000
China will help because they dont want their communist ally to collapse. Immigration, and sharing a border with South Korea isn't the best thing ever... |
China has already had a bunch of problems with North Korea already.
quote:
Again, there would be a flood of peopel going into China. China does not want this and is trying to preserve North Korea so it can keep its people to itself. |
I actually think most fleeing North Koreans will travel to the South, not to China.
quote:
Wasn't it the CIA that also said something along the lines of "If you attack Iraq, chances of terrorism will incease"? |
And if you don't they will the chances would be double that.
quote:
And china will surpress them using its very large military. You need to remember that internal dissent does not automatically equal a revolution. The chances of a "democratic" revolution in China are actually quite low. |
The chances of a democratic revolution in China are low? 1989. Man are you ignorant or what? Get a clue? You wanna know why I said 1989? Because there was a failed revolution then. The Chinese Government had its army run people over with tanks.
quote:
That's not a very logical arguement, Fez. "You are foolish" offers no proof of that arguement nor the one before it, and therefore I can't debate it until you begin using some logic. |
Shut up, already. You don't have a single clue about what you are talking about.
quote:
Yet another illogical arguement. Why can't you just counter it using any form of logic at all? If I don't know what Im talking about and you do, then counter it. |
You talking is itself illogical. You possess little intelligence to argue in this area.
quote:
So? Do you really think China will simply let its North Korean ally simply collapse because it has a bad economy and let millions of people cross the border INTO china? |
Again, that carries no basis. Most fleeing North Koreans would flee to South Korea because of exactly similar language and population demographics. And many in the North have long lost families in the South.
quote:
Even if it wanted to theres still that problem of people just flooding that border..... |
I think South Korea has more to worry about on that case.
quote:
And how is it "bullshit"? Because you don't like it? |
I take Colin Powell's word for it. There is something certainly wrong with Iraq's report. To be direct it is all a lie. And people like you will believe it. Delusional I say.
quote:
Have you ever heard "innocent until proven guilty"? I will admit that it does seem quite impropable they'll catch EVERYTHING in their small little probe, but until the United States can actually offer EVIDENCE that Iraq possess these weapons..... |
The US has evidence. But to maintain national security and safety of field agents, they cannot show it. Your ignorance will say otherwise, but that is a wrong statement to make. They cannot show it because people at the field will get killed.
quote:
I dunno....They could've sold them, hidden them, they couldv'e been destroyed by Saddam or by the United States.... |
There hidden. No they haven't been destroyed. By the way they was chemical weapons testing up around 1993 after the Gulf War.
quote:
However again, thats not evidence of a thing other than they're missing. Iraq may not even have them. Who knows.....they could've given them to Pakistan who gave them to NORTH KOREA! |
You don't have any way of proving my statement otherwise. Actually the proof is on my side. And there is evidence things are missing.
quote:
But again that does not mean their guilt. Innocent until proven guilty.... |
Bull! Stop with this innocent until proven guilty nonsense. They already have been proven guilty, nimwit.
quote:
What hasn't it done? |
Iraq has failed to provide an accurate list of what it has.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fez
China has already had a bunch of problems with North Korea already. |
Not enough problems to warrent a termination of their little alliance.
quote:
I actually think most fleeing North Koreans will travel to the South, not to China. |
Then why don't they right now? Most of them try to flee TO China.
quote:
And if you don't they will the chances would be double that. |
Ok Fez, since your mind cant seem to comprehend this: The CIA warned *AGAINST* an attack saying that the chances of a retaliatory strike by any islamist group go up DURASTICALLY.
They didn't say "But if you dont attack chances will be double" because its not true. Whether you like it or not, the facts are the facts.
quote:
The chances of a democratic revolution in China are low? 1989. Man are you ignorant or what? Get a clue? You wanna know why I said 1989? Because there was a failed revolution then. The Chinese Government had its army run people over with tanks. |
Fez, get a clue: That was more of a demonstration than a "revolution" considering they really didn't do much to overthrow the government, now did they?
Also note that China quite easily squandered the "revolution" (in your words fez, not mine)
quote:
Shut up, already. You don't have a single clue about what you are talking about. |
Is that all you can do fez? "Shut up shut up shut up shut up"
Having trouble accepting the truth, you arent giving a logical arguement AT ALL?
quote:
You talking is itself illogical. You possess little intelligence to argue in this area. |
Who hoo fez, yet ANOTHER stupid arguement. If I'm so illogical and unintelligent, THEN QUICKLY SQUASH ME AND GET IT OVER WITH. Don't just sit there with your fingers in your ears yelling "Shut up."
quote:
Again, that carries no basis. Most fleeing North Koreans would flee to South Korea because of exactly similar language and population demographics. And many in the North have long lost families in the South. |
MANY flee to China, not South Korea. Consider this: Up until now, fleeing to South Korea was MORE dangerous than trying to go into China.
If China was so eager to get rid of its alliance with N. Korea, then WHY DOESNT IT? Why does China still strongly support North Korea? Hmm?
quote:
I take Colin Powell's word for it. There is something certainly wrong with Iraq's report. |
The Bush Administration is right because the Bush Administration says so? Thats called a "begging the question" fallacy....But there are many fallacies you commit.
quote:
The US has evidence. But to maintain national security and safety of field agents, they cannot show it. |
Fez, thats stupid and we BOTH know it. Why can't they show ANY SHRED OF EVIDENCE AT ALL? MAYBE THE LOCATION OF SUCH A SITE?
Just giving a location to the inspectors for a "surprise" visit would DEFINATELY NOT kill agents.
Fez, NOBODY will believe the US if it keeps this up...You can't just tell the world "Just trustus." ESPECIALLY when you've shown youreslf untrustworthy.
quote:
Your ignorance will say otherwise, but that is a wrong statement to make. They cannot show it because people at the field will get killed. |
Again Fez, just giving the inspectors a LOCATION will not kill Field Agents. Your just following your shepard which is why you can't construct a strong arguement against showing the evidence.
quote:
There hidden. No they haven't been destroyed. |
How do you know?
quote:
By the way they was chemical weapons testing up around 1993 after the Gulf War. |
Source?
quote:
You don't have any way of proving my statement otherwise. Actually the proof is on my side. And there is evidence things are missing. |
Thigns may be missing, but theres not evidence as to WHY their missing.
quote:
Bull! Stop with this innocent until proven guilty nonsense. They already have been proven guilty, nimwit. |
Fez, EVIDENCE consitutes something that disproves or proves a theory. However, just HAVING the evidence doesnt make it evidence. YOU MUST SHOW IT.
In a murder case, lets say there was a note that was written to the police saying "I'm going to kill Martha on January 23rd at 12:00AM.". If the evidence is never presented, then it will not weigh on the juries mind. SAME CASE HERE: YOU CANT JUST HAVE THE EVIDENCE AND NOT SHOW IT BECAUSE THEN ITS NOT EVIDENCE.
quote:
Iraq has failed to provide an accurate list of what it has. |
Fez, why dont you prove to me you aren't carrying nuclear weapons in whereever YOU live? Oh thats right, you CANT.......Because you can't prove that your innocent. It's IMPOSSIBLE. If you say "I dont have any nimwit" I can call you a nimwit and say your hiding it. If you turn whever you live upside down I can say your hiding it somewhere else.
So how can you prove Iraq has WoMD when you claim you have evidence BUT WILL NOT SHOW IT (Therefore basically telling everyone you dont have the evidence) and you basically can't prove a negative?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fez
Tass, I donīt have time to respond to all of the irrelevant points as I have been doing. There is common quote I bring up: Less talk, more substance. Give me something I can actually work with. Right now you are providing me with scattered arguments, that have no evidence and weak foundations. |
In other words, you want to end the debate, and thats fine by me.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24.
Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-12-2002 02:29
|