 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
axi
|
 |
Athens Greece
Sep 1999 time: 07:24
|
|
Nationalism seems to be a necessary stage in the evolution of the capitalist system. It is intertwined with the expansion of the dominance of a certain class of capitalists over land and people and the securing of influence zones, vital spaces where each individual capitalist class has can grow unhindered by competition. Once one capitalist state becomes developped enough, it comes out of the closet and tries to take over other economies, by money or by force and enters it's imperialist stage. This parallel advancement of rival elites is what is leading to nationalistic wars and creates the imerialist chain, where each country has it's place according to it's strength.
Greek capital was the first to advance in the nationalist stage in the Balkans, so Greece (along with Serbia) was the first state to emerge out of the Ottoman empire. It's policy was definitely expansionist, until it reached the maximum it's population dynamics and the interests of the greater powers allowed. Yet the most important factor that halted the Greek imperialist expansion in 1922 was the emergence of Turkish nationalism in 1908 which hastened the conflict in the area and led to gains for the Greeks and other Balkan nations, until the Turkish recovery. Albania, as the most backward nation of the area, did not go through that stage at that time and is going through it nowdays. Hopefully it is still the underdog of the region and will not cause any real trouble until it gets through the phase.
The Turks have been traditionally devout soldiers and the military is the prime element of their culture. I am not impressed that they are better soldiers than we are. Paiktis would say that they are, compared to us, abyssmal seamen and and airmen. He would say that the Greek navy has had the honour to be the only navy in the world that has never lowered it's flag to admit defeat from an enemy.
Personally, I am not at all jealous of the Turks or proud of our own military prowess, since the greatness of nations is truly found in their culture. I feel that a country that has too many soldiers is primarily hurting itself rather that it's enemies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:24
|
|
"As for The Asian Minor thing, noone gets it doen correctly the first time.
Rugclothed Greeks against an empire and still we went all the way to their capital. "
Need to brush up on your history, Paitkis? Hardly the first time, Turkey had already been in two wars against modern Greece, the Greek War of Independence and the First Balkan War. Those "rugclothed Greeks" were veteran troops that had just been victorious in a world war. Ataturk's forces were what he had built together from his original guerilla movement. The Greeks weren't against an empire, the Ottoman gov. in Istanbul was basically a puppet regime, Ataturk's forces were republicans. And again, you did get to Ankara, but you got knocked all the way back.
"Now, either with arms or with their forced democratization western Turkey will again be populated by Greeks. the drive is too strong. "
Not likely. In addition to the Turkish military, any agression would also mean facing US and Israeli military forces. Meaning you lose.
"Personally, I am not at all jealous of the Turks or proud of our own military prowess, since the greatness of nations is truly found in their culture. "
Well Football is the most important element of European culturea, and given Turkey's recent performance in the world cup in which they were the third best team in the world, and Greece didn't even qualify, I wouln't say Greece is too far ahead of Turkey culturally......
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|