 |
|  |
 |
|
Meshelic
|
 |
Bringer of Peace, Destroyer of Worlds
Sep 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
Check out this embarrassing Court Case right here.
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...&threadid=73076
I'll begin by saying that upon reading this thread, I am continously annoyed by this case as it keeps going. To begin with, I don't believe it should have even been brought to the Court, is a waste of time even for the plaintiffs, though especially the Judges who have to watch the Plaintiffs make a mockery of the Court and it's system.
That the only reason this case is in existence is because of a minor fault in the Constitution that a Cabinet Veto must take place within 72 hours of the law they vetoed. In reality, the Veto took place so shortly after the time limit that it really should not even have been challenged.
There are those who would seek the Constitution followed to the letter, even the faulty portions of it like this. They are also the same people who do not wish to compromise their position by agreeing that REAL LIFE takes PRECEDENCE over ANYTHING that happens in this game.
Might I point out that if the NewCon REALLY took precedence over everything in the minds of those here, even really life matters, than many of us in real life could be without jobs, isolated from our families, and simply forum-junkies doing nothing but letting our eyes rot from the electrons in our monitors.
Who cares if the Veto was missed by a couple hours, or even longer? Does it really matter?
Might I also point out that this Court Case #9 has been the most unorthodox (not not the person, the WORD) and embarrasing case in the history of 'poly.
The Judges and Defendants have had to wait patiently while Plaintiffs without much of a case argue amongst themselves, hurl insults, and make a mockery of the Court.
I mean seriously folks, remember Reddawg vs. Mr Orange? That was a serious case, one that was carried out in an orderly manner, with both sides intelligently speaking their case, and not resorting to personal attacks, spam posts, or otherwise off-topic statements. Unlike #9. There is no respect for the Court in this latest case, not much that I've seen anyways.
Enough of my rant. I will stand outside the Great Courthouse and start a picket line. I will proudly hang a sign above my head that proudly states in fine, bold letters:
"LEAVE THE CABINET ALONE!"
Who is with me?
Meshelic
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
WhiteBandit
|
 |
Southern California
Jul 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
Thud, perhaps I worded it wrong, but this post by MSS (a cabinet member, so it holds some authority I think) explains the opinion I am trying to say:
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...861#post1589861
quote: Originally posted by ManicStarSeed
Aggie, I agree with you regarding precedent. I just want to see the problem solved by the Senate, not the Court. You had the right idea don't push it, let the issue be resolved in time and let people get a plan together.
Skywalker, Spiffor as DM as the POWER to sponsor a senate bill which directly affects his duties as DM and that bill CAN repeal another law. As for the illegality of the veto, it is not illeagal, just ineffective as if it (the veto) never happened.
There is NO reason for a court case as NO law was violated, yet. If the DM or Prez assimilated foreign workers, then the law would be violated and there is a case. THERE IS NO CASE HERE. Just an argument of wheather the law will (note... will) stand up in court if it is violated. I can pretty much assure you that it will.
You are RIGHT, the veto is INVALID, TOO LATE and MEANINGLESS. The law stands as the VETO NEVER HAPPENED. Are you asking the Court for a ruling on it, go for it. There is NO real counter argument that can be made.
Again if the pres or DM want to push the issue, they will assimilate some foreign workers this next turn chat and BREAK THE LAW. Then there will be a case. Untill then we have an ambigous situation. There have been no laws or rules broken, just a missed deadline and some ensuing confusion.
The court can rule on the veto, but it seems simple...IT NEVER HAPPENED, deadline missed, the law stands. My suggestion is let the senate fix the standing law.
Nuff said
Mss
PS. It seams that I am shouting, but I am just empahsizing some points.
Have fun... |
Regardless of the legality. I think the justices should drop the case as it is a waste of everyone's time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
quote:
I mean seriously folks, remember Reddawg vs. Mr Orange? That was a serious case, one that was carried out in an orderly manner, with both sides intelligently speaking their case, and not resorting to personal attacks, spam posts, or otherwise off-topic statements. Unlike #9. There is no respect for the Court in this latest case, not much that I've seen anyways.
|
The Court has decided to run this case a little differently. It has not been very controlled and we will discuss if future cases will be run like this. I expect the case to end soon.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Meshelic
|
 |
Bringer of Peace, Destroyer of Worlds
Sep 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Togas
This thread troubles me greatly, but your point has been made. I am personally dissapointed that the more free-form approach to these cases did not fix the slow nature of our system, as I had hoped it would nor has it helped us to resolve the issues sooner. If anyone has some constructive ideas on how we can improve these hearings in the future, without laying out a whole mess of complicated procedural law, please post here or send me a PM.
Ideally, I'd like to fix the system so that it is more open to the public, moves faster, and gives everyone involved a voice in the issue. Those three things are somewhat difficult to combine, but we're working on it.
--Judge Togas |
Togas
I have no intention of being demeaning towards our judicial system, in fact I support it wholeheartedly. All the Judges have done a fine job in previous cases, and are all very gifted individuals. Freedom of speech allows me, and others, to disagree with the basis of the Court Case #9, however.
Should this matter have gone to Court? Upon purely technical terms, yes, it probably had to be done in order to follow the NewCon to the letter. I understand that.
Is it in the best interests of those involved? My personal opinion says no. I see it as a waste of their time, although I understand that nobody is holding a gun to my head, forcing me to read the thread. 
There is nothing wrong with people thinking the case at hand is a petty matter, not worthy of our great Court.
I simply don't wish to see the time of talented individuals such as yourselves wasted on a largely inconsequential case.
Although I have immense respect for the parties involved, I don't think it's to anyones benefit here to continue this case.
Meshelic
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MJW
|
|
MN,USA
Jul 2002 time: 23:25
|
|
I am doing this because if I do not stop this will not be a good precendent for real life vs. the con. I want to settle this issue so it never happens again so I will arge my point as best as I can. The reason why I started this argument is because I could attack weak points a decided (dumbly) two throw in 2 sentences that talked about real life vs. the con. I do not want to stop now otherwise I would have wasted 2 hours of my time for no reason. I was working on the arguments that skywalker made but he beat me to it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Meshelic
|
 |
Bringer of Peace, Destroyer of Worlds
Sep 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
MJW and Skywalker
I don't intend to cast blame on either of you, that's not my intention. I don't wish to discredit either of you, I realize that maybe you felt like you needed to save face since the Case started. I don't know if that's it or not, and it's not up to me anyways.
MJW the time you spent wasn't for waste. If you believed it to be right than you did what you could and that is certainly respectable. We still don't know how the Court will rule on this subject, so it's all up in the air. 
The issue of Real life vs. duties here shouldn't....be an issue. That's just my opinion, as all of my comments in this thread are. Just opinions.
Arnelos was late in approving of the Veto, due to real life issues that he could not avoid. That is, to me, acceptable. Real life should never be ahead of the demo game. That is really my only argument for the Defendants, although I admit I'm not a party in the case and have nothing to do with it other than my comments in this thread here.
I understand both points, the plaintiffs and defendants. Both are correct in many ways, so I can see why it would be a delicate case to handle.
Thank goodness I'm not on the Court. I don't have half the patience our Judges do. 
Good luck to all of you
Meshelic
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MJW
|
|
MN,USA
Jul 2002 time: 23:25
|
|
It was dumb beacause I just should have not even stared the court case because like Meshelic said it does not matter.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|