 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:25
|
|
The pro-choice vegetarian who doesn't eats eggs means that this individual is all for the killing of human eggs/embryos but is against the killing of chicken eggs/embryos
it's ironic and you are stupid if you don't see the irony, even if there are different reasons for each
thanks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dauphin
|
 |
Caught in a tuna net
Jan 1970 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
Dino,
Simple. The SM requires empircal data and logic. Religion, on the other hand, is all about faith in the absense of empirical evidence or logic.
-Arrian |
Interestingly the 'scientific method' was in part developed by a bishop.
I don't see a contradiction, they about different things. SM is about how, when, where - anything measurable and predictable. Religion* is about why and what - anything that is ethereal or nebulous.
* Religion in the broadest sense, be it ethics, morality, metaphysics or navel gazing.
Last edited by Dauphin on 17-01-2003 at 02:46
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
Contradictory Believes:
Miller Lite tastes great and is also less filling.
-come on, that just can't be!
SUVs contributes to the terrorists.
-really? I new there was something fishy about GM, hey, by the way, what do you drive?
Affirmative action is o.k.
-hmmm, yeah, I guess all those minorities need help getting in to schools because they are, afterall, inferior. [That is sarcasm, thank you]
note: is not really weird that some of the strongest supports to abolish affirmative action are, themselves, minorities?
Those against the destruction of trees (tree hugers) who live in houses, receive a pay check, and pretty benefit from wood.
-ya know you like the wood.
Those who believe that we were decendent from an Alien race, and decided to clone humans, yet live in France.
-odd, to me at least, shouldn't they be in Texas? 
Those who support the Atheist Party (not sure if there is one, but if there isn't there should be).
-strangly enough, lack of political leadership still requires someone to lead that movement.
Existentialists who have an IRA, 401K, or B, or any kind of savings plan.
-who are you trying to kid.
Gothic kids at Disneyland.
-I really saw this, I couldn't help laughing; "We are so sad and pathetic, we must challenge our inability to smile by going to the 'happies place on earth'"...give me a break.
Most religious people on everyday of the week but their day of worship.
-I love it; we pray for you on Sunday, because on Monday you'll need it!
My mom and her views on education
-"on't you get smart with me!", smack!
-"all F's, what were you thinking?!", smack!
-how do they get away with this
While I'm on that point;
Parents who don't believe in spanking their kids
-not sure how this is contradictory, but a) you are suppose to hit you kids, that is what they are there for, b) if you don't hit your kid, how else will the learn to become hand-shy and have that instinct of survival that is so prized by boxers and leopards, and c) kids like to be hit, this is why those who are not spanked generally grow up into criminals.
---
quote: I don't see a contradiction, they about different things. SM is about how, when, where - anything measurable and predictable. Religion* is about why and what - anything that is ethereal or nebulous.
|
Sagacious hit the nail on the head with that one
Also, if you understand SM how can you not buy into religious dogma? Especially since their is no definite scientific way to prove whether or not their is a god. This true because in order to do so you would have to declare all of existance, as well as that outside of existance, as your SYSTEM. And since we cannot do that yet, we are SOL.
If you really think I am wrong, try anything to prove there is a god. If you fail then your system is not large enough...that is the religious way. I guess the only really test that could be performed at this time would be to die, and see what is there.
I am long winded...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Existentialists who have an IRA, 401K, or B, or any kind of savings plan. |
huh?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
Existentialists who have an IRA, 401K, or B, or any kind of savings plan.
-who are you trying to kid.
|
I think you are confusing nihilism with existentialism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
Those who support the Atheist Party (not sure if there is one, but if there isn't there should be).
-strangly enough, lack of political leadership still requires someone to lead that movement.
|
Huh? You mean other parties are led by the Lord Jahweh Himself?
There was me thinking that politics had bugger all to do with religion in general, but all along these people have been getting whispers from God/Allah/Rama or whatever...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: I don't see a contradiction, they about different things. SM is about how, when, where - anything measurable and predictable. Religion* is about why and what - anything that is ethereal or nebulous. |
I understand the difference in what each attempts to explain. However, the method by which Religion tends to explain the "why and what" is, to me, very much at odds with a logical mind. Then again, there are many brilliant scientists who are religious. I just don't understand them. 
Great sig, by the way. In response: "The pagans had very big festivals on Easter and Christmas, and then the Christians came along and had very big festivals at Easter and Christmas. Kids eat chocolate eggs on Easter because the color of chocolate and the color of the cross... Well? You tell me! It's got nothing to do with it, has it? Eggs are for fertility, bunny rabbits are for ****ging, it's the spring festival!"
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowwHand
|
 |
of The Cooler
Sep 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
Contradictory Believes:
Those who believe that we were decendent from an Alien race, and decided to clone humans, yet live in France.
-odd, to me at least, shouldn't they be in Texas? 
This will get you an ass-whoopin'. 
Gothic kids at Disneyland.
-I really saw this, I couldn't help laughing; "We are so sad and pathetic, we must challenge our inability to smile by going to the 'happies place on earth'"...give me a break.
So you want to just be surrounded by the same little preppies?
Most religious people on everyday of the week but their day of worship.
-I love it; we pray for you on Sunday, because on Monday you'll need it!
Clear as mud 
My mom and her views on education
-"on't you get smart with me!", smack!
-"all F's, what were you thinking?!", smack!
-how do they get away with this
Stop being a little butt-head then. 
---
I am long winded... |
True 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:25
|
|
'Cause we need a good knees up with the family too every once in awhile, and Easter/Xmas are days when everyone will have time off work/school etc. We'll eat well, drink a lot and in general have a good time, and in my case this has sod all to do with the birth or death of Christ.
If everyone had a 4 day weekend in the second week of September but not in the 3 week of December, we'd have it then.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
What hypocrisy. Capital punishment did your savior in. An innocent man, no less.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:25
|
|
I really think Jesus' message was distorted considerably over the years. I think frescos and what not of Jesus and the disciples done by the late Romans/early Byzantines showed Jesus in armour, grasping a sword, and being militant.
Just as Jesus was blondized in order to appeal to northern europeans (and is being negroized now to appeal to black christians) it is possible that Jesus and his message has been interpreted as one of peace incorrectly.
thanks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
loinburger
|
 |
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris
Oh, there's all that "turn the other cheek," forgiveness, non-violence stuff he rambles on about. |
I forget where I read it (IIRC it was a paper written by ckweb, but I can't remember the url for his website), but "turn the other cheek" doesn't mean "forgive and forget," it means "force your enemy to treat you as an equal." Apparently back in Roman times if you slapped somebody with the back of your hand then you were treating them as an inferior, whereas if you slapped them open-handed then you were treating them as an equal. So, if you "turn the other cheek," then you force your enemy to slap you open-handed, thereby treating you as an equal.
[/pedantic mode]
quote: Originally posted by Bods
Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually exclusive. |
Say what?
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
However, the method by which Religion tends to explain the "why and what" is, to me, very much at odds with a logical mind. |
Depends on what religious philosophy you're referring to. If you mean Augustine or Aquinas, then I heartily disagree that logic is completely separated from religion. If you mean Falwell or those people who cut off their balls so that the Halle-Bopp comet would spirit them away to Alien-land (what was that cult called again? Didn't it have something to do with Nike shoes?), then yup, logic doesn't really seem to enter into the picture.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sagacious Dolphin
I don't see a contradiction, they about different things. SM is about how, when, where - anything measurable and predictable. Religion* is about why and what - anything that is ethereal or nebulous.
* Religion in the broadest sense, be it ethics, morality, metaphysics or navel gazing. |
Redefining terms is generally frowned upon.
quote: Originally posted by Sagacious Dolphin
I don't understand why atheists celebrate Christmas and Easter, it seems contradictory, but hey, there we go. |
Nah, what really is contradictory are Christians celebrating these pagan holidays.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by loinburger
I forget where I read it (IIRC it was a paper written by ckweb, but I can't remember the url for his website), but "turn the other cheek" doesn't mean "forgive and forget," it means "force your enemy to treat you as an equal." Apparently back in Roman times if you slapped somebody with the back of your hand then you were treating them as an inferior, whereas if you slapped them open-handed then you were treating them as an equal. So, if you "turn the other cheek," then you force your enemy to slap you open-handed, thereby treating you as an equal.
[/pedantic mode]
|
Bah, don't buy it. Look at it in context. Matthew 5:
"But I say to you, Do not resist one who is evil. But if any one strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also; 40 and if any one would sue you and take your coat, let him have your cloak as well;"
and Luke 6:
"But I say to you that hear, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28 bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you. 29 To him who strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also; and from him who takes away your coat do not withhold even your shirt. 30 Give to every one who begs from you; and of him who takes away your goods do not ask them again."
That's got nothing to do with showing you are equal, it has to do with forgiving your enemies and not seeking vengeance on those who have wronged you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
loinburger
|
 |
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
That's got nothing to do with showing you are equal, it has to do with forgiving your enemies and not seeking vengeance on those who have wronged you. |
Like I said, I don't remember the original URL from where I read this, so I googled for "turn the other cheek." This site struck me as being the most relevant/promising/whatever (though you'll need to scroll about halfway down the page to get to the relevant portions):
quote: Far from counseling the disciples to become doormats, Jesus suggests ways in which oppressed disciples may seize the initiative, call attention to their oppression, and declare their worth as human beings. After a backhand slap on the right cheek, turning the left cheek may be a defiant gesture. It says, "You did not succeed in humiliating me. Try again, only this time you must hit me as an equal." Whether or not the oppressor accepted the invitation to strike again, he would be acknowledging the other person's refusal to be cowed. |
quote: If Wink's interpretation is correct, then turning the other cheek, giving both garments, and going a second mile are all examples of reproof, not capitulation. |
This site, which was the first to come up in the search, confirms the conclusion. (This one seemed less reliable, though, hence my quoting the other instead.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|