 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The diplomat
urge North Korea to halt its threats |
Which were made in light of the US stance that it will never negotiate (though thats beginning to crack.)
Every nation will and have the right to have nukes.
quote: against Saddam who has hurt peace, |
Because Saddam wont budge no matter what the protestors say. Though I should point out many people have condmened him.
quote: or Clinton who bombed Serbia? |
Already protested.
quote: They don't care about world peace! |
A few dont care about world peace. But most do. Plus, Iraq right now is the hot issue. It owuld be incredibly stupid to "protest" Iraq invading Kuwait unless he actually does it again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:25
|
|
No, **** Cheney is fine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by orange
worst troll ever |
I agree. I've seen much better even from Speer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:25
|
|
I agree, sort of.
The groups that act against war on Iraq, Israel in general, etc., almost never even say anything about places like the Sudan, where scores of people are killed all the time. I don't think that this is due to the fact that there is no chance to change in policy there. I think is that there are some interest groups, and there is a large movement of people that play along with a certain act, whether they conciously do it, or just don't have any higher brain functions of their own. It's not like they're chose to go to the demonstration against the US position because they know they have a shot at changing policy. In entire forums, BBs, pages on the web there is hardly any mention of other conflicts at all.
These of course should be separated from the "it's none of our bussiness" group.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
ive seen better from boddington's...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: It is so easy to follow the crowd and do what ever is "in" |
Right now conservatism and so called "patriotism" is "in"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
oerdin, so you want our country to be more in league with stalin like tactics?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The diplomat
I hear the anti-war protesters say that they just want world peace and and an end to violence and conflict.
If this is true, how come they never have big protest to urge North Korea to halt its threats and nuke programs? Surely North Korea is threatening world peace. |
The DPRK isn't threatening world peace. Is Europe, Africa, or North American in any way threatened by the DPRK? No. Would the United States be threatened if we didn't have 37,000 troops in the RoK? No. Is the DPRK actually threatening to attack anyone? No. Would protests against the DPRK have any effect on the DPRK? No.
quote: If the protesters want peace, how come they never protest against Saddam who has hurt peace, or Clinton who bombed Serbia?
How come they only bash the US and Israel? |
Hussein's not a threat to anyone but his neighbors, and not a serious threat to any of them but Kuwait. Kuwait is actually a worse place than Iraq, so why should we give a damn about Kuwait?
We did protest against the war on Serbia.
We bash the US because the US is an imperialist power, acting in the narrow self-interests of certain American elites (not even in the national interest) and Israel because they are the largest recipient of American foreign aid (with which they carry out a campaign of ethnic cleansing).
Azazel, exactly what effect would protests in the US have on the war in Sudan? There are groups working to end slavery in Sudan as well as trying to relieve the food crisis in Southern Sudan. While I think that we should be arming the Christians and Animists in the South, I can't really say it would be in their best interests seeing as the US would only aid those groups it felt best represented American elites' interests. Given the weight of history, those groups would tend to be rather nasty and dicatorial . . . which is still better than the genocidal Arab government.
Oerdin, in case you hadn't noticed, being a protestor and leftist hasn't been in in over thirty years in the US. I'm sure there are some people who fit your discription, but if the last anti-war movement is anything to go by, most people have a deep aversion to having murder committted in their name. The people who will suffer most are the Iraqi civilians, and most anti-war activists are very aware of this.
Thrawn05, every anti-war movement in the last hundred years has been organized and led by socialists and communists. Why should this one be any different? Hell, both Russian revolutions started out as anti-war protests.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|