 |
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
Well - since Wise Ass does not seem to be around currently and IW as delegate is not doing it I'm taking the liberty to kick of the discussion.
If you look at the map, I'd say there are two spots for the next two cities. The first one just south of the potato, the second one north of the coal.
Furthermore I think we can risk moving the settler along without protection. There were no barbs around when Dave passed through and really - i'd just risk it, because it's most important not to delay settling.
So - city 2 south of the potato on the river - any thoughts?
Attachment: map.png
This has been downloaded 63 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
I agree, on the river below the spud, that allows for 2 border bumps for each city without overlap.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
Dave is the "southern warrior" as he has been known. In the screenshot hes the bloke on the right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Locutus
I think Dave should explore the terrain near the grape while we build an extra Warrior. Though far away, that looks like it might be an excellent city location as well. |
I can't imagine a spot that would be so good that it allow for waisting quite a number of turns of moving the settler. It's a must that we build our second city ASAP.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
My vote is for the potato site.
We need to ICS a bit... with a little garrisoning thrown in.
In this case, closer is better... we can worry about spreading out when we've got a foothold in the world.
MrBaggins
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Turambar
|
|
England
Apr 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
Potato site looks the best. We can get there in a couple of turns and the river allows for quick troop movements between the cities etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pedrunn
Lets move west or north-west |
Any reasons for the west? If you look at this screen shot http://apolyton.net/forums/showthre...304#post1668304 the best place in the west would be south-west - though the Austrians are close nearby. Maybe we should settle there to fend their expansion off. But then, it'll take us at least 4 turns to get to a equivalant site to the south-of-potato-spot, which can be reached in 2 turns.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
Does anyone have great objections to the river tile just south of the potato? Because if - we need a poll, otherwise Wise Ass or IW for that matter should just order it next chat.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
I think, the potato makes up for the swamp because it gives a good food bonus - plus to get the settler to Dave we waist too many turns - the third or fourth city, yes.
And it's also easier to defend two cities that are close together!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
Sorry gents..........
We need a poll to decide upon.
Even if no-one objects, we still need a poll, otherwise whoever doesn't like the 'decision' could go to court and make a call against it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
No Gilg, settling is not something that must be polled (unlike war e.g.) - but I'd prefer a vote too.
As for the coal site - it's a good one as well but growing will be slow there. I think we should use the growth of a city by the potato to build another settler and then settle there.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
Mapfi,
you are right, I was a bit too quick glancing over the connie.....just wanted to avoid problems......
For the rest, we need GROWTH (Vel has it explained quite nice in one of his thread's).
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|