 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:25
|
|
We should just save money and withdraw from Korea altogether. Not our business anyway, never was.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
Dan, that's the great unknown. In the late 70's US equipment in europe was so bad it was a secret. I hope NK stuff is all rusting crap. Thing is, dictators look after their military before they fix their elevators...or they aren't dictators any more.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
Oerdin, Hummers w/ AC eh? 
Oh, and Flatlander, M60A2 vs T72...I'll put my money on the T72...
Last edited by Lancer on 07-02-2003 at 07:20
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
Well, they're not boring.
I heard this morning that an aircraft carrier (the Stennis?) is heading for Korea...
So, we'll soon know if NK is bluffing, or nuts.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Who is to say that they're not both?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
NK TODAY: "If the US deploys more forces to Korea, we will reduce the region to ashes"
The USS Vincent is the carrier on the way. More "troops and planes"-FOX news-are also on the way.
Wish I knew what troops?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Anyone here you sniff at the threat is a fool. "yeah, 37K US troops can easily defeat 1,000,000 NK soldiers, yeah, cakewalk..." Bullsh1t of the first degree. Still, any initial NK offensive would be stopped, mainly by the 600,000 SK troops along the front in conjunction with US airpower. Still, Korea is the last place the US wants to fight, those damn mountains make our airpower less usefull, and the NK have a way of digging tunnels (US intellienge suspects the NK has several tunnels big enough to fit thousands of troops and equipment, that go under the DMZ and almost all the way to seoul. ) Any war in Korea would make Iraq look like a pitiful sideshow, both in terms of American loss of life, total loss of life, economic losses, economic disruption, so forth and so on. We should pray that it does not happen.
As for diplomacy: no one would back NK: China has much to lose form any war nearbye, specially in spooking foreign investment. The Russians care much more about SKorean trade than NKorea. NK would be alone, and the war would still be short, but extremely ugly. |
I agree with this. NK is miscalculating if it expects China to rescue it a second time.
The best chance to avoid war is for China to tell NK that if it attacks, it should not expect Chinese assistence if it begins to lose.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oerdin
|
 |
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001 time: 21:25
|
|
NK has been running similiar statements in the communist controled press for the last 60 years. There is nothing new here except a few western news outlets actually paid attention to what they're saying.
Everything is business as usual.
Last edited by Oerdin on 09-02-2003 at 00:09
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
My two cents.
One of the main reasons we are hesitant to go toe to toe with NK in a shooting war is because that will be a real war. Lots of casualties and lots of time, probably years.
A little off topic: anyone remember the Pueblo incident with NK?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|