 |
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Not one country in the area or the rest of the world, for that matter are, per se, friends with Iraq.
They are the only expansionist power in the region.
They are also enthusiastic developers of WMD- enthusiastic chemical & bio-weapon developers... innovating developing a supergun. History of Saddam's exploits are well documented. He says he's sorry... and won't do that any more...
Right... and if you believe that... then I gotta bridge to sell you.
Whats the problem here, people?
That some Iraqi's are going to die?
They seemed to have no difficulty in surrendering last time. They saw the outcome... they should just surrender a bit earlier this time to save on the casualties.
They only have themselves to blame if they stand in front of the overwhelming force.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
NeOmega
|
 |
Play Pentagenesis Beta!
Feb 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by orange
NeOmega - I highly doubt it. And I've been to rallies. People may not like the war, but not many Americans who don't support war are willing to rally or riot because of it. Sad truth. Because if they did, half the nation would be on the streets protesting - Bush couldn't ignore that.
During Hardball at my University, when Matthews asked who supported and who didn't, it was something like 4 times as many were against war...probably 80% to 20%...but not that many people attended our protest in Newark last week, and not that many will in the coming weeks when we do it again.
So, as much as I'd like to see that come true, let's be realistic. |
I don't wish for violent protests. There are cities that are much more on edge than others.... I named Cincinnati, Seattle and Los Angeles for a reason. Mostly they have had recent riots, and most riotors got away clean. I have talked to a few of the WTO riotors, they loved the excitement, and the anarchy, and they didn't learn their lesson the first time. They talk of it as a great adventure and about how oppresive and wrong the police were.
I have not actively searched for peace protests yet, but believe me, when war actually begins... I will be there.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Many of the wealky anti-war will become supporters because they believe that opposing the war means opposing the soldiers. |
So? Why should I support people who volunteer to join a military that they know has a history of aggression?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Floyd
So? Why should I support people who volunteer to join a military that they know has a history of aggression? |
I'm not saying you have to do so, I'm saying that most of the anti-war movement will quail and quietly vanish, just as happened last time. Unless, somehow, the war proves to be longer than we expect, the majority will support the war once it starts. If it takes more than a few months, however, people will begin to question their support of it. Basically, middle Americans are pretty fickle.
Amerians have also had it beaten into their heads for the last twenty years that Vietnam Vets weren't given any support either during the war or after, and that reulted in American defeat, large numbers of American dead, and high suicide rates among vets, all of which, is simply a right-wing myth.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|