 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
I do believe that the situation in Afghanistan could be turned around but it requires a 5 to 10 year commitment that seems to be being lost in the rush to Iraq.
What is the basis for your "seems"? We are to keep ~9,000 troops in Afghanistan indefinitely, the same amount as we've ever had on the ground. In each of '03 and '04 we are spending $625 million in assistance, just as we said we would. |
I am a cynic. I agree that the troops and money will be in Afghanistan for the next 12 to 18 months. After that Afghanistan won't be news, there will be other countries/situations needing aid and there may be a new US president with other priorities.
Time will tell.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:25
|
|

I've read enough Fisk to know that he's rabidly anti-American (The Guardian, for instance, just loves him). Like Ming says, that doesn't make him wrong, it just means he has an agenda to push, and you should know that when reading his work.
He's also, as Ming says, very pro-Palestinian (The Lebanon Star carries articles by him all the time. Every single one of them is anti-US/anti-Israel). Again, that doesn't make him wrong, just biased.
Know your source, Horse. If one of the US uberpatriots showed up and posted a bunch of stuff from say... the Washington Times (known right-wing nutjobs), you would react with a strong dose of skepticism. Same as I do with Fisk. If you've read one of his articles... you've read them all.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Imran:
The WSJ is conservative, is it not?
It often has a pompous, preachy style, has it not?
the "no mention of America's support for Israel and its occupation of Palestinian land" was a jibe that should have fitted in another place, ok.
But he's just spicing up his writing style a bit. Does that really come across as anti-american or biased, compared to the the excessively boring style of US media?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
Taking the place can be done, holding it cannot. Afghanistan has the potential for being another Vietnam, if we don't have the sense to leave. That said, we can always take the place again, and by so doing keep the terrorists off balance and away from our skyscrapers. Rebuilding the place is like rebuilding South Central LA. Just fuel for the next fire...
The difference between Vietnam/Afghanistan and Iraq, AH, is one you know I'm sure...
Terrain, terrain, terrain!
We can hold Iraq forever if we need to.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
I've seen Apolytoners support some pretty stupid things, but that post just beat em all. Dissident, You have brought stupid to a whole new level.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alexander's Horse
|
 |
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970 time: 15:25
|
|
No reply - LOL!
Last edited by Alexander's Horse on 11-02-2003 at 07:36
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|