 |
|  |
 |
|
OneFootInTheGrave
|
 |
Kuzelj
Nov 2000 time: 05:25
|
|
Now let's go back to the Afghan "success"... and few articles from different sides
Russian:
http://english.pravda.ru/main/2003/02/10/43176.html
quote:
Russian Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov considers the terrorist movement Taliban may possibly return to power in Afghanistan. “There are no conditions for prevention of the Taliban new coming to power,” – he said Saturday in his speech at the international conference on terrorism in Munich.
“So far the Khamid Karzai administration does not possess necessary influence in provinces. New terrorist attempts at the Afghan leadership are being committed, while the terrorists are being trained abroad,” – Ivanov said. He considers to be necessary to make “coordinated efforts, including at the international level, to oppose Islamic extremism of any shape.”
Sergei Ivanov is especially concerned “with the situation in the neighbouring north-west province of Pakistan, where the Taliban positions are very strong.” After Americans practically leave Afghanistan to the mercy of fate and focused on Iraq, the Taliban became more active. Within recent two weeks, 17 attacks against UN missions and international charity organizations were registered. For example, January 26, some unknown persons attacked a column of food cars in the province of Nangarkhar: two people were killed and four injured. The same day, bomb exploded in UN mission in Mazar-i-Sharif. January 27, in the province of Farah, 6 Afghan specialists from UN Agency of Mine Clearing were beaten unmercifully. January 29, a hand-made explosive device was thrown to the mission of the non-governmental organization Action against Hunger in Kandaghar. January 30, some armed persons captured two World Food Programme workers in Kabul outskirts, who happily were later released.
All the incidents show worsening of the security situation in the country and stirring up of the Mojahedeen, the Taliban supporters, and Al-Qaida militants. |
check this out
http://www.knoxnews.com/kns/world/a...1732130,00.html
quote:
I think they're hiding in little nooks," said Capt. Rob Shaw of the 82nd Airborne Division. American soldiers "would clear a cave, announce it good and blow it, and then the next day see a guy coming out of the same cave." |
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...7-2003Feb8.html
quote:
Rising Violence Hurts Afghanistan Aid Work
-----
Such attacks are becoming increasingly common in southern Afghanistan, particularly here in Kandahar, the birthplace of the Taliban. In the past several weeks, a car belonging to an aid group was riddled with 16 bullets; two foreign land-mine removal specialists were slightly injured when their car hit a booby-trapped mine; Afghan workers with aid groups have been tied up and robbed; a grenade was thrown at an Afghan relief organization's car; and leaflets have been found urging locals to attack foreigners and Afghans who work with them. In neighboring Helmand province today, local officials told the Reuters news agency that unidentified gunmen attacked a security post on Friday, killing five Afghan soldiers and kidnapping two others.
-----
He and others said the security problems do not all stem from Islamic militancy. Banditry and highway robberies have increased, and foreign workers with relatively fancy cars and usually limited security make attractive targets. The threat of bandits is so great that Hagiwara said he couldn't bring money to Kandahar to pay his many Afghan subcontractors, but rather required them to travel 300 miles north to Kabul, the capital, to pick up their funds.
One group now providing relief and reconstruction services that says it definitely won't be leaving soon is the U.S. military, which is planning to bring more civil affairs officers into the Kandahar area within weeks. The military's plan is controversial among relief groups, which have expressed fear that the line between humanitarian and military work is being dangerously blurred. But the officers' presence would ensure that some rehabilitation of the area continues.
|
a bit more UK
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentS...d=1042491642384
quote: Unfinished business in AfghanistanBy Isobel Coleman
-----
Afghanistan remains unnervingly fragile. Basic security and stability have still not been achieved. Expansion of the UN's 4,800-strong International Security Assistance Force is a dead issue. Instead, the US remains committed to training a professional, multi-ethnic Afghan National Army. But that will take years. After months of boot camp, only one company of 50 men has been deployed, with a few hundred more soldiers in the pipeline. Meanwhile, outside Kabul, regional warlords and bandits, often in cahoots, prevail. Aid agencies are reluctant to expand their services beyond a few urban centres. Without security there is no hope for the economy, and without a stable economy there is little hope for the people.
-----
[q]
and there is more....
like
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2003Jan28.html
[q]BAGRAM AIR BASE, Afghanistan, Jan. 28 -- U.S. and allied forces, including B-1 bombers and AC-130 gunships, surrounded and pummeled a group of about 80 Afghan guerrillas on a mountainside in southeastern Afghanistan, killing at least 18 in the largest battle in the country since spring, military officials said today.... |
with a comment later
I found
quote: Apparently, in this age of high-tech warfare, the concept of a blocking force has been forgotten. The Jan. 29 front-page article "Allies Rout Rebels in Afghanistan" has our military using 350 troops with B-1 bombers, F-16s and AC-130s to launch 19 J-DAMS 2,000-pound bombs and two 500-pound GBU bombs and thousands of rounds of lesser firepower. A few hundred thousand pounds of jet fuel were burned, too -- all to kill some 18 rebels.
That's one 2,000-pound bomb per kill, with all the other munitions for show. Thank goodness we aren't going up against China. How many more of these missions can we afford? |
not so easy as it seems... but we don't seem to hear much anyway as Afghanistan is not a hot issue anymore. There is a good part too and that is that US and the rest of the world want to build a local army that should become the government force and bring order and stability, but are they putting enough efforts in that direction?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:25
|
|
Fisk has a way of getting conservatives in on this topic riled up- after all, not many reporters have stars (John Malkovich in this case) threaten to kill them. Is Fisk biased? Yes. Is his bias based on ignorance, or experience? The man begun his career in Lebanon, not the place to become a US and Israel cheerleader, now is it?
MOst US columnists are deeply anti-Saddam biased. I have heard few complaints about his, since so many people share said bias here and take it as self-evident. I guess its not a bias if its 'true', now is it boys?
Calling Fisk biased is fine, but as of yet, none of you caling him biased have been able, or willing, to answer not his opinions, but the statements he put as fact. Do you assume that they are correct then?
Calling someone biased is easy. Dealing with ones own, hard, and taking on statements made as fact when you have nothing to disprove them even harder. I agree with Fisk on many thing_ I admit my bias. I also have no facts of my own, or sources of my own, that can 'disprove' those statements he made as fact. I am left then to think, that bias and all, he is more correct about the current situation in Afghanistan than all of those simply saying: "He's biased, lalalalalalalala...."
Nice new topic AH.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|