 |
|  |
 |
|
Graag
|
 |
London
Nov 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
You wait 20-odd years to make a film, then two come along...
I've recently disappeared from Apolyton in order to finish the post-production of my first student film project and make another short for my film course (in a state of panic as I'd left it all to the last minute).
I'm finding it very difficult to get anyone to respond even half-honestly about the films... I see lies in their eyes as soon as I ask what they thought.
So I'm wondering if any apolytoners would be willing to d/l a short film from me, and post some comments/critisism.
The second project is the only one I have at the moment as it was made on DV and edited on my computer, but the other is 16mm and I haven't got a video copy yet.
Any takers?
[EDIT: to save anyone interested having to read through the thread, the files can be found here www.planetacol.com/~graag/wakeup.html]
[MORE EDIT: if anyone else wants to do d/l it, I'd be grateful if you could do a little experiment: turn the sound off on the movie and try watching the film whilst listening to music you consider powerful, roughly 3 1/2 to 4 mins worth. I find I enjoy the film a lot more when I turn off the terrible sound and stick Shellac over it. I'd still like more comments/critisism (glutton for punishment) so don't be shy!]
Last edited by Graag on 13-02-2003 at 07:18
|
|
|  |
 |
|
monolith94
|
 |
New England
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
The irony, of course, is that I'm critiquing your criticism style without providing the evidence I demand of you.
What is the evidence? Evidence is form. In poetry, the artform I have most recently been critiquing, we deal with alliteration, rhythm, metaphor, etc. I imagine with music it could be from anything from technical competency, verse structure, rhythm variation, quality of lyrics (which would receive much of the same criticism poetry would), etc. For art, would could analyze originality, coloration, style, any number of things that I could go into if I were an art history major or artist...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
monolith94
|
 |
New England
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
One gets the impression that the filmmaker has seen Mulholland Drive and Blue Velvet a few times too many... Like, try a couple hundred.
It's basically an experimental college piece. No plot, really. It's all images and sounds. The use of the alarm clock is abrasive, and does not make for easy viewing, but I suspect that the mindset of the filmmaker was 'screw easy, I'm going to challenge their preconceptions by putting in this repititious alarm clock!', while the only thing it truly challenged was my patience.
Decent editing, although I wasn't too found of the camera angles. They were scattered all about the place, and gave me the impression of "ooh, look at me, I know how to do this type of shot, and this type of shot, and this one too! They didn't seem to serve a purpose.
Also, get that boy a shave and a haircut! Yuck!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|